| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-10-31 | |||
| 16:05:52 | elodilles | \o/ | |
| 16:05:53 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:06:06 | bauzas | I think I've seen some gate failures on my rpc series | |
| 16:06:29 | bauzas | but I need to verify which jobs were having problems | |
| 16:06:41 | bauzas | I hadn't time yet to recheck | |
| 16:07:50 | bauzas | moving on ? | |
| 16:08:16 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:08:53 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html | |
| 16:08:57 | bauzas | #info Caracal-1 milestone in 2 weeks | |
| 16:09:23 | bauzas | we agreed last week on the fact today should be a spec review day but unfortunately I hadn't provided an email | |
| 16:09:35 | bauzas | so if you want, next week will be the first spec review day | |
| 16:09:37 | bauzas | fine ? | |
| 16:09:48 | bauzas | next tuesday* | |
| 16:09:53 | sean-k-mooney | the spec review day was not ment to be today | |
| 16:10:35 | bauzas | well, I will be on bank holiday tomorrow (+ Uggla + kashyap IIRC) and on Friday I'll be on PTO | |
| 16:10:51 | kashyap | *Yep) | |
| 16:10:59 | bauzas | https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-ptg#L175 said R-22 would be our spec review day | |
| 16:12:01 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i gues syou did say r-22 | |
| 16:12:07 | sean-k-mooney | i feel like that was a mistak | |
| 16:12:37 | sean-k-mooney | i tought i suggested m1 for that bvut no worries | |
| 16:12:38 | bauzas | no, I remember we said 'the week after PTG' | |
| 16:12:41 | sean-k-mooney | we can do it next week | |
| 16:13:02 | bauzas | m-1 was for reviewing implementations | |
| 16:13:03 | sean-k-mooney | oh we are doing the implemation review day on m1 | |
| 16:13:12 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:13:25 | sean-k-mooney | so ya we missed the first sepc review day | |
| 16:13:34 | bauzas | yeah, my fault | |
| 16:13:37 | sean-k-mooney | honestly im still burnt out form ptg so next week woudl be better | |
| 16:13:39 | bauzas | -ETOOMANYTHINGS | |
| 16:13:49 | bauzas | okay, agreed | |
| 16:14:15 | bauzas | #info Next Tuesday (Nov 7) we will have a spec review day | |
| 16:14:24 | bauzas | #action bauzas to community on that review day | |
| 16:14:27 | bauzas | #unfo | |
| 16:14:31 | bauzas | #undo | |
| 16:14:31 | opendevmeet | Removing item from minutes: #action bauzas to community on that review day | |
| 16:14:39 | bauzas | #action bauzas to communicate on that review day | |
| 16:15:13 | bauzas | I'll also communicate the implementation review day in 2 weeks from now | |
| 16:15:35 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:15:38 | bauzas | #topic Caracal vPTG planning | |
| 16:15:42 | bauzas | #undo | |
| 16:15:42 | opendevmeet | Removing item from minutes: #topic Caracal vPTG planning | |
| 16:15:52 | bauzas | #topic Caracal vPTG wrapup | |
| 16:15:59 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-ptg PTG etherpad | |
| 16:16:18 | bauzas | I have some draft in my emailbox that I need to eventually write | |
| 16:16:31 | bauzas | I just don't know when yet | |
| 16:16:42 | bauzas | for the moment, please look at the etherpad | |
| 16:16:53 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:17:00 | bauzas | we had one single topic we were unable to talk | |
| 16:17:01 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: wehn you send the eamil | |
| 16:17:11 | sean-k-mooney | please use the readonly link for the etherpad | |
| 16:17:27 | bauzas | like every cycle I do ? sure | |
| 16:17:46 | bauzas | I already did | |
| 16:17:46 | sean-k-mooney | ack not everyone does | |
| 16:17:53 | bauzas | + I downloaded a text file | |
| 16:18:01 | gmann | ++ | |
| 16:18:15 | bauzas | and I tagged the latest rev | |
| 16:18:39 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: look at summary emails I write for a long time now | |
| 16:18:58 | bauzas | you'll see what I provide | |
| 16:19:02 | bauzas | anyway | |
| 16:19:06 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:19:27 | bauzas | we agreed on something last week, so I'll punt this topic for this week | |
| 16:19:40 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:19:43 | bauzas | elodilles: please | |
| 16:19:48 | elodilles | o7 | |
| 16:19:55 | elodilles | stable/2023.2 branch was broken due to openstacksdk-functional-devstack job, but it is fixed -- https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/899154 | |
| 16:20:08 | elodilles | thanks gmann for pinging me about this ^^^ | |
| 16:20:18 | elodilles | other stable gates state should be also OK | |
| 16:20:44 | elodilles | (or at least i'm not aware of any issue) | |
| 16:20:45 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:20:49 | elodilles | stable release patches proposed: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/releases+is:open+intopic:nova | |
| 16:21:06 | elodilles | so release liaisons please review ^^^ | |
| 16:21:10 | bauzas | yeah I need to review them | |
| 16:21:12 | elodilles | we might not need all of them | |
| 16:21:20 | bauzas | that said, I have some bugfix I'd like to backport :) | |
| 16:21:26 | bauzas | but let's not wait for it :) | |
| 16:21:30 | bauzas | or | |
| 16:21:33 | bauzas | as you want | |
| 16:21:34 | gmann | also, these hyperV and vmware driver deprecation backport to stable/2023.1 are ready for 2nd review https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:deprecate-virt-drivers+status:open | |
| 16:21:37 | elodilles | if you want to wait for any bugfix, then just -1 it | |
| 16:21:43 | gmann | thanks bauzas for reviews. | |
| 16:21:47 | bauzas | actually I have two series I want to backport | |
| 16:21:53 | gmann | maybe it will be good to include those in releases elodilles mentioned | |
| 16:22:03 | bauzas | the compute rpc fix and the sriov gpu fix | |
| 16:22:16 | bauzas | elodilles: could we then wait a little bit before releasing ? | |
| 16:22:26 | elodilles | bauzas: for sure | |
| 16:22:52 | bauzas | elodilles: if you don't mind, I'll -1 the release patches | |
| 16:22:53 | dansmith | the compute rpc one for sure! | |
| 16:23:09 | bauzas | I need to create the backports | |
| 16:23:11 | dansmith | sorry someone was at the door when we talked about gate stability, | |
| 16:23:21 | dansmith | but I've had to recheck those a few times now, all for different reasons :( | |
| 16:23:22 | bauzas | np | |
| 16:23:28 | dansmith | feels like we're slipping here | |
| 16:23:39 | bauzas | I've seen multi-cell | |
| 16:23:56 | bauzas | but I haven't yet looked at *what* failed for this job | |
| 16:24:08 | dansmith | each one I've looked at has been a different thing | |
| 16:24:17 | bauzas | lovely | |
| 16:25:08 | bauzas | something due to some stuff with 'v' name that ends by 'olume' ? | |
| 16:25:22 | dansmith | some, but not all | |
| 16:25:46 | bauzas | if that's something starting with 'n' and ending by 'etwork' I can understand | |
| 16:26:08 | bauzas | anyway, I need to do homework, I just don't know yet when | |