| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-10-10 | |||
| 16:00:43 | han-guangyu | o/ | |
| 16:01:03 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:01:51 | bauzas | ok, I guess we can softly start | |
| 16:02:09 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:17 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:23 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 46 new untriaged bugs (+2 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:02:38 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:02:45 | bauzas | melwitt: around ? | |
| 16:03:23 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:04:11 | gibi | o~ | |
| 16:04:31 | gibi | I did not manage to look at bugs. Sorry | |
| 16:05:46 | bauzas | np | |
| 16:07:16 | bauzas | okay let's continue | |
| 16:08:24 | bauzas | #info bug baton is melwitt | |
| 16:08:29 | bauzas | #info https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2026345 failed for nova few times. | |
| 16:09:46 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:10:24 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:10:31 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:11:01 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:11:53 | bauzas | anything to discuss ? | |
| 16:12:19 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:12:24 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:12:29 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html | |
| 16:12:34 | bauzas | #info Nova deadlines are not yet defined and will be once the PTG happens | |
| 16:12:37 | bauzas | #info Caracal-1 milestone in 5 weeks | |
| 16:12:49 | bauzas | again, any questions so far , | |
| 16:12:51 | bauzas | ? | |
| 16:13:12 | sean-k-mooney | nope | |
| 16:13:32 | bauzas | continuing so | |
| 16:13:37 | bauzas | #topic Caracal vPTG planning | |
| 16:13:40 | bauzas | #info Sessions will be held virtually October 23-27 | |
| 16:13:44 | bauzas | #info Register yourselves on https://ptg2023.openinfra.dev/ even if the event is free | |
| 16:13:47 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-ptg PTG etherpad | |
| 16:13:51 | bauzas | #info add your own topics into the above etherpad if you want them to be discussed at the PTG | |
| 16:13:55 | bauzas | that's it | |
| 16:14:12 | bauzas | we already have a few topics, thanks folks who added them | |
| 16:14:20 | bauzas | but please continue to add some if you want | |
| 16:14:27 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:14:35 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) | |
| 16:14:38 | bauzas | #info As a reminder, people eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for asking cores to also review | |
| 16:15:00 | bauzas | I said I was about to propose a Gerrit dashboard for those, I had no time yet to do it | |
| 16:15:08 | bauzas | #action bauzas to propose a Gerrit dash | |
| 16:15:15 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:15:20 | bauzas | elodilles: ? | |
| 16:15:24 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:15:32 | elodilles | i'm not aware of any gate issue | |
| 16:15:41 | elodilles | otherwise nothing else to report | |
| 16:15:48 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:16:09 | elodilles | please add stable gate issues if you see any ^^^ | |
| 16:16:14 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 16:16:22 | elodilles | that's all from me | |
| 16:17:19 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:19:19 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:19:24 | bauzas | (bauzas) Specless blueprint approval for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/aggregatemultitenancyisolation-to-support-unlimited-tenant | |
| 16:20:23 | sean-k-mooney | hum | |
| 16:20:42 | bauzas | wdyt about that ? | |
| 16:21:06 | sean-k-mooney | dont we support having multiple keys | |
| 16:21:18 | sean-k-mooney | so i didnt think there was an effective limit today | |
| 16:22:46 | sean-k-mooney | or parhaps we require one aggreate per tenatnt today i would have to review the code | |
| 16:23:10 | sean-k-mooney | the patch is basiclly enabling what i orgianlly tought already worked | |
| 16:23:22 | sean-k-mooney | instead of looking for filter_tenant_id explictly | |
| 16:23:28 | sean-k-mooney | just making that a prefix | |
| 16:24:00 | sean-k-mooney | so you can have filter_tenant_id=<tenant-0> filter_tenant_id_1=<tenant-1> | |
| 16:24:30 | sean-k-mooney | thats proably an ok change to make | |
| 16:25:35 | sean-k-mooney | tenant isolation shoudl be done via placement | |
| 16:25:45 | sean-k-mooney | and we shoudl really be removing the filter based approch so im not sure | |
| 16:27:16 | bauzas | sahid wanted to still use the filters | |
| 16:27:53 | sean-k-mooney | i would be in favor of deprecateding it for removal in D if the current fucntionlaiy is supproted by the placment approch | |
| 16:28:41 | sean-k-mooney | https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/aggregates.html#tenant-isolation-with-placement | |
| 16:28:47 | dansmith | tenant isolation can't be done entirely in placement right? | |
| 16:28:55 | bauzas | I think sahid actually wanted to backport this | |
| 16:28:57 | sean-k-mooney | i belive it can | |
| 16:29:02 | dansmith | all we can do is select an aggregate and then get placement to limit for us | |
| 16:29:14 | bauzas | you know what ? we can punt this until he can be around | |
| 16:29:33 | sean-k-mooney | so given this dicussion i would say not a specless blueprint | |
| 16:29:40 | sean-k-mooney | spec or ptg discussion | |
| 16:29:41 | dansmith | right | |
| 16:30:48 | sean-k-mooney | i think the fucntionaliyt is possible today withthe placement approch so i would question why we dont remove the filter | |
| 16:30:59 | sean-k-mooney | so i would like to capture the answer to that | |
| 16:31:51 | bauzas | okay, let's say this | |
| 16:31:57 | bauzas | I'll tell this to sahid tomorrow | |
| 16:32:12 | bauzas | and he could explain why he still wants to use filters | |
| 16:32:20 | bauzas | (IMHO like I said, backports) | |
| 16:32:39 | bauzas | do all agree ? | |
| 16:32:44 | sean-k-mooney | backports are a downstream problem | |
| 16:33:01 | bauzas | sure, but this is easier with a python module like a filter, right?. | |
| 16:33:03 | sean-k-mooney | that is not a good reason to extend it upstream unless its useful upstream | |
| 16:33:21 | bauzas | sure, we need to discuss the usecases | |
| 16:33:33 | bauzas | but I'm not in favor of removing every single filter we have | |
| 16:33:44 | dansmith | agree | |
| 16:33:44 | bauzas | some operators still run filters on their choices | |
| 16:34:17 | bauzas | anyway, let's punt this until PTG or when sahid can join us | |
| 16:34:26 | dansmith | we have the prefilter for isolation, which uses placement's aggregates to do some isolation, but I'll have to revisit my understanding of the differences | |
| 16:34:31 | bauzas | #agreed defer this agreement to the next PTG | |
| 16:34:49 | bauzas | I'll add a topic in the PTG etherpad | |
| 16:34:55 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: we deveoped that prefilter to eventurlly remove this one | |
| 16:36:07 | sean-k-mooney | https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/rocky/implemented/placement-req-filter.html#proposed-change | |
| 16:36:43 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: well, for CPUFilter, I totally agree with removing it | |
| 16:36:47 | sean-k-mooney | this was the first prefilter that you wote many moons ago | |
| 16:37:24 | bauzas | I'm just saying that for non-allocatable filters (placing things) we may leave those if those are cheap to maintain | |