| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-02-07 | |||
| 16:39:00 | elodilles | a bit related to release: 'Release final os-vif for 2023.1 Antelope' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/872779 | |
| 16:39:06 | bauzas | (yet again saying, don't expect the reviews to magically happen, be present and interact with us) | |
| 16:39:19 | bauzas | elodilles: good catch I forgot to add it the agenda | |
| 16:39:23 | bauzas | Important : | |
| 16:40:05 | bauzas | #info Thursday is the non-client libs feature freeze, which means we can only accept features changes for os-vif, os-traits and os-rc up until Thursday | |
| 16:40:25 | bauzas | later changes will be on hold until next release | |
| 16:40:40 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:41:17 | bauzas | I haven't looked at os-vif, os-traits and os-resourceclasses master branches, but I think we have open changes on them | |
| 16:42:16 | bauzas | so, if anyone wants some addition to those libraries, I'd recommend them to ping me or anyone else for reviews | |
| 16:43:05 | bauzas | last point | |
| 16:43:18 | bauzas | FeatureFreeze is on next Thursday | |
| 16:43:26 | bauzas | we'll see how the gate goes by that time | |
| 16:43:59 | bauzas | but as for the older releases, the most important for having your series accepted for Antelope is to get a +W before Thursday EOB | |
| 16:44:20 | bauzas | we'll manage the rechecks if needed | |
| 16:44:41 | bauzas | don't freak out by the gate stability, but please continue to ensure your patches are ready for reviews | |
| 16:44:55 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: i was planning to propose an os-vif release to include rodolfos patches | |
| 16:45:06 | sean-k-mooney | so i want to confirm the sha before we move forward with that | |
| 16:45:10 | sean-k-mooney | ill do that after the meeting | |
| 16:45:16 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: as i know he updated the release patch already | |
| 16:45:18 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: thanks, appreciated | |
| 16:45:47 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: but please -1 if something is still missing | |
| 16:45:53 | sean-k-mooney | ack just looking now ill +1 if its correct | |
| 16:46:06 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: that is even better :) | |
| 16:46:46 | bauzas | I think for os-traits I've seen one patch from Uggla | |
| 16:47:02 | bauzas | but I don't think we can reasonably merge the nova related series | |
| 16:47:15 | Uggla | yep but it can wait. | |
| 16:47:34 | bauzas | next topic, if so | |
| 16:47:37 | bauzas | #topic vPTG Planning | |
| 16:47:43 | bauzas | a bit early butn | |
| 16:47:49 | bauzas | #link https://www.eventbrite.com/e/project-teams-gathering-march-2023-tickets-483971570997 Register your free ticket | |
| 16:48:26 | bauzas | also | |
| 16:48:34 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bobcat-ptg Draft PTG etherpad | |
| 16:48:55 | bauzas | every cycle, we're asked how long we should have sessions | |
| 16:49:25 | bauzas | I thought it would be better to somehow have an idea on how many topics we gonna discuss before saying how many slots we need :) | |
| 16:49:36 | bauzas | but I know | |
| 16:49:47 | bauzas | lots of topics will arrive the week before the PTG :) | |
| 16:50:03 | sean-k-mooney | the more virtual ptgs we have the less energy i have for them. that said i would prefer to have more slots over more days then a few short long ones | |
| 16:50:04 | bauzas | the thing is, you have the etherpad, feel free to amend it | |
| 16:50:14 | sean-k-mooney | s/short// | |
| 16:50:41 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: this cycle, we will also have a "physical PTG" at the middle of bobcat-1 | |
| 16:50:54 | bauzas | that could alleviate some discussions | |
| 16:50:55 | sean-k-mooney | that should really be for C planning | |
| 16:51:08 | bauzas | or B implementation phasing :) | |
| 16:51:26 | sean-k-mooney | either/both its close to Spec Freeze | |
| 16:51:33 | bauzas | I haven't checked whether the proposed B agenda is merged yet | |
| 16:51:39 | sean-k-mooney | so proably to late for directional changes on large specs | |
| 16:52:01 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: don't disagree, I'm just saying it could help some small contributors to get audience when they need | |
| 16:52:02 | elodilles | B schedule was merged | |
| 16:52:08 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:52:10 | bauzas | so | |
| 16:52:13 | sean-k-mooney | https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html | |
| 16:52:16 | sean-k-mooney | so yes its merged | |
| 16:53:02 | bauzas | https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html ays that pPTG will be 3 weeks before specfreeze (if we agree on the PTG at b-2 being spec freeze) | |
| 16:53:23 | bauzas | so, that's why I'm saying we could have a shorter but productive vPTG | |
| 16:53:31 | bauzas | like 2 hours per day | |
| 16:53:45 | bauzas | (and ideally, I'd like to attend some TC discussions this time) | |
| 16:54:00 | sean-k-mooney | i would prefer to frontload the plannign to the vPTG and have the physical one be more C focused but ok | |
| 16:54:16 | bauzas | don't disagree | |
| 16:54:19 | sean-k-mooney | because of its time in the cycle it feels more like a fourm then a ptg | |
| 16:54:23 | bauzas | anyway, we're rushing out of time | |
| 16:54:30 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:54:41 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) | |
| 16:54:47 | bauzas | #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review | |
| 16:54:51 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:54:57 | bauzas | elodilles: you have 5 mins (sorry) | |
| 16:54:59 | elodilles | #info stable branches seem to be OK back till wallaby | |
| 16:55:04 | bauzas | huzzah | |
| 16:55:05 | elodilles | stable/wallaby gate is passing (failing openstacksdk-functional-devstack job was removed from wallaby) | |
| 16:55:13 | bauzas | thanks gmann for the hard work on stable/wallaby | |
| 16:55:18 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:55:19 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:55:21 | elodilles | #info stable/victoria gate is affected by the same failing openstacksdk-functional-devstack job | |
| 16:55:30 | elodilles | #info ussuri and train gates are broken broken ('Could not build wheels for bcrypt, cryptography' errors) | |
| 16:55:38 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:55:41 | elodilles | EOM | |
| 16:55:54 | bauzas | elodilles: I'll pay attention to the ussuri branch with the CVE backport | |
| 16:56:01 | elodilles | bauzas: ack | |
| 16:56:10 | bauzas | ... when I have time :) | |
| 16:56:18 | elodilles | bauzas: i have a proposed potential workaround | |
| 16:56:26 | elodilles | for ussuri | |
| 16:56:42 | bauzas | elodilles: cool, let's figure that out after the meeting, tomorrow per say | |
| 16:56:51 | elodilles | bauzas: ++ | |
| 16:56:54 | bauzas | fwiw, I'm planning to deliver the cve fix down to ussuri | |
| 16:57:07 | bauzas | but not provide any backport to train | |
| 16:57:08 | elodilles | why not train? :) | |
| 16:57:16 | bauzas | due to the oslo.utils versioning | |
| 16:57:26 | bauzas | most of the distros now made the backports | |
| 16:57:36 | bauzas | so it's upstream support | |
| 16:57:42 | bauzas | and Train is on EM | |
| 16:57:50 | elodilles | well, Wallaby is EM | |
| 16:57:56 | bauzas | and ussuri too | |
| 16:57:57 | elodilles | (and Xena soon, too) | |
| 16:58:12 | bauzas | but it was simple to backport the fix down to ussuri | |
| 16:58:19 | bauzas | it was cheap, so we proposed it | |
| 16:58:28 | bauzas | backporting it to train is a totally different story | |
| 16:58:28 | elodilles | ok :) thanks for that! | |
| 16:58:54 | bauzas | it requires some oslo.utils backport too (and then a janga puzzle with dependency management) | |
| 16:59:06 | elodilles | :S | |
| 16:59:24 | bauzas | so, things are said, crystal clear. | |
| 16:59:39 | elodilles | thanks, i see | |