| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-02-07 | |||
| 16:50:54 | bauzas | that could alleviate some discussions | |
| 16:50:55 | sean-k-mooney | that should really be for C planning | |
| 16:51:08 | bauzas | or B implementation phasing :) | |
| 16:51:26 | sean-k-mooney | either/both its close to Spec Freeze | |
| 16:51:33 | bauzas | I haven't checked whether the proposed B agenda is merged yet | |
| 16:51:39 | sean-k-mooney | so proably to late for directional changes on large specs | |
| 16:52:01 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: don't disagree, I'm just saying it could help some small contributors to get audience when they need | |
| 16:52:02 | elodilles | B schedule was merged | |
| 16:52:08 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:52:10 | bauzas | so | |
| 16:52:13 | sean-k-mooney | https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html | |
| 16:52:16 | sean-k-mooney | so yes its merged | |
| 16:53:02 | bauzas | https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html ays that pPTG will be 3 weeks before specfreeze (if we agree on the PTG at b-2 being spec freeze) | |
| 16:53:23 | bauzas | so, that's why I'm saying we could have a shorter but productive vPTG | |
| 16:53:31 | bauzas | like 2 hours per day | |
| 16:53:45 | bauzas | (and ideally, I'd like to attend some TC discussions this time) | |
| 16:54:00 | sean-k-mooney | i would prefer to frontload the plannign to the vPTG and have the physical one be more C focused but ok | |
| 16:54:16 | bauzas | don't disagree | |
| 16:54:19 | sean-k-mooney | because of its time in the cycle it feels more like a fourm then a ptg | |
| 16:54:23 | bauzas | anyway, we're rushing out of time | |
| 16:54:30 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:54:41 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) | |
| 16:54:47 | bauzas | #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review | |
| 16:54:51 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:54:57 | bauzas | elodilles: you have 5 mins (sorry) | |
| 16:54:59 | elodilles | #info stable branches seem to be OK back till wallaby | |
| 16:55:04 | bauzas | huzzah | |
| 16:55:05 | elodilles | stable/wallaby gate is passing (failing openstacksdk-functional-devstack job was removed from wallaby) | |
| 16:55:13 | bauzas | thanks gmann for the hard work on stable/wallaby | |
| 16:55:18 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:55:19 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:55:21 | elodilles | #info stable/victoria gate is affected by the same failing openstacksdk-functional-devstack job | |
| 16:55:30 | elodilles | #info ussuri and train gates are broken broken ('Could not build wheels for bcrypt, cryptography' errors) | |
| 16:55:38 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:55:41 | elodilles | EOM | |
| 16:55:54 | bauzas | elodilles: I'll pay attention to the ussuri branch with the CVE backport | |
| 16:56:01 | elodilles | bauzas: ack | |
| 16:56:10 | bauzas | ... when I have time :) | |
| 16:56:18 | elodilles | bauzas: i have a proposed potential workaround | |
| 16:56:26 | elodilles | for ussuri | |
| 16:56:42 | bauzas | elodilles: cool, let's figure that out after the meeting, tomorrow per say | |
| 16:56:51 | elodilles | bauzas: ++ | |
| 16:56:54 | bauzas | fwiw, I'm planning to deliver the cve fix down to ussuri | |
| 16:57:07 | bauzas | but not provide any backport to train | |
| 16:57:08 | elodilles | why not train? :) | |
| 16:57:16 | bauzas | due to the oslo.utils versioning | |
| 16:57:26 | bauzas | most of the distros now made the backports | |
| 16:57:36 | bauzas | so it's upstream support | |
| 16:57:42 | bauzas | and Train is on EM | |
| 16:57:50 | elodilles | well, Wallaby is EM | |
| 16:57:56 | bauzas | and ussuri too | |
| 16:57:57 | elodilles | (and Xena soon, too) | |
| 16:58:12 | bauzas | but it was simple to backport the fix down to ussuri | |
| 16:58:19 | bauzas | it was cheap, so we proposed it | |
| 16:58:28 | bauzas | backporting it to train is a totally different story | |
| 16:58:28 | elodilles | ok :) thanks for that! | |
| 16:58:54 | bauzas | it requires some oslo.utils backport too (and then a janga puzzle with dependency management) | |
| 16:59:06 | elodilles | :S | |
| 16:59:24 | bauzas | so, things are said, crystal clear. | |
| 16:59:39 | elodilles | thanks, i see | |
| 16:59:41 | bauzas | elodilles: thanks elodilles for the stable report | |
| 16:59:46 | elodilles | np | |
| 16:59:50 | bauzas | last point for the 20 secs left | |
| 16:59:54 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:59:59 | bauzas | nothing on the agenda | |
| 17:00:04 | bauzas | so I'll close the meeting | |
| 17:00:16 | bauzas | feel free to add your items for next week | |
| 17:00:19 | bauzas | thnaks all | |
| 17:00:21 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 17:00:21 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Feb 7 17:00:21 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 17:00:21 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-02-07-16.01.html | |
| 17:00:21 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-02-07-16.01.txt | |
| 17:00:21 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-02-07-16.01.log.html | |
| 17:02:33 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 17:02:37 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: we can chat after the meeting but is the crytography issue beign adressed in train. | |
| 17:04:07 | gibi | bauzas: I left feedback in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872975 | |
| 17:04:29 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney[m]: ensure-trust workaround seems to be working for stable/ussuri (i proposed it to master last time accidentally): https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/872969/ | |
| 17:05:01 | bauzas | gibi: appreciated. I can speak French, English and a bit of German and Spanish, but my eventlet is definitely small | |
| 17:05:24 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney[m]: and ykarel in neutron added it to tempest (devstack, actually) as well for train, so hopefully something like that should do the trick in train | |
| 17:05:53 | gibi | it is not a big codebase (eventlet + greenlet) but it is not straitforward either. And greenlet has parts of it implemented as a C extension to python :) | |
| 17:06:46 | bauzas | gibi: elodilles: thanks for the reviews | |
| 17:07:00 | elodilles | np | |
| 17:07:00 | bauzas | to clarify, 1/ this is hard to tell which tests are in cause | |
| 17:07:16 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: ack i was asking as its currenlty blocking a ceilometer/devstack fix i was working on | |
| 17:07:43 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: changes to the telemetry tempest plugin check for compatiablity with train | |
| 17:07:44 | bauzas | elodilles: you missed today's conversation but I basically grepped the occurrences of such problem trying to intersect the failing tests and basically there were no suspects | |
| 17:07:58 | bauzas | elodilles: because the failing test is not responsible | |
| 17:08:21 | bauzas | elodilles: this is just an unfortunate test that runs at the same time than the thread is throwing the exception | |
| 17:08:23 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: i tought you siad orginaly ensure-rust would not work | |
| 17:08:28 | bauzas | bite by the bullet | |
| 17:08:57 | bauzas | gibi: about your comment, not sure I fully understand | |
| 17:09:09 | bauzas | gibi: I can remove the DNM: prefix in the log | |
| 17:09:14 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: yepp, and i was wrong :/ (pushed it to the wrong branch) | |
| 17:09:41 | gibi | bauzas: I'm not happy to merge this as it will log things that is misleading I would rather keep a DNM patch that we recheck until hits the issue | |
| 17:09:45 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: ah ok :) then cool i can recheck https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/telemetry-tempest-plugin/+/872350 after its merged | |
| 17:09:54 | bauzas | gibi: but for case #1 you mentioned, this seems to me OK to have this log | |
| 17:10:17 | bauzas | gibi: I mean | |
| 17:10:19 | elodilles | bauzas: ack. i got your intention (i think): to catch the test with the 'DNM' log whenever we see the failing test | |
| 17:10:40 | bauzas | I'm a developer, I'm writing a functest and I forget to poison libvirt | |
| 17:10:53 | sean-k-mooney | we have a fixture to poision it | |