Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-16
17:34:25 rloo i haven't been doing upstream stuff, so i don't even recall how ironic does it... i did try to find doc about it but gave up.
17:34:46 sean-k-mooney rloo: i acttully care about the cherry-pick lines less then other but i knwo melwitt and elodilles do like them to be done a specific way
17:35:41 sean-k-mooney for me i just do a git reset --hard origin/stable/<whatever> then git review -X <previous version>
17:35:51 rloo no worries. should i create new PRs, the 'right' way?
17:36:39 sean-k-mooney well they dont have to be new reviews just need to fix the commit message with the cherry pick lines
17:38:12 rloo well, if i manually do that -- there won't be a conflict in the wallaby one (if i recall) cuz the change was similar to the xena one. but i didn't tell you that, i'll fix the commit messages...
17:39:06 sean-k-mooney right so i do not normllay remove the confit bit in that case although i know other do
17:39:16 sean-k-mooney i do if others ask
17:39:27 rloo (and if someone had time to fix that UI so it doesn't allow cherry picking from master to n-2+ stable branches, heh)
17:39:58 sean-k-mooney one thing i have not tested is if the behvior change if the patch is merged
17:40:03 rloo sean-k-mooney: ahh, yes, you're right. if i had cherry picked from xena (which mentions the conflict), the wallaby one would have the same commit msg so.
17:40:04 sean-k-mooney i think it does
17:41:02 sean-k-mooney basically if its merged and you cherry pick it i think it addes the line properly
17:41:26 sean-k-mooney i think it only doesnt if you do it to an open reivew. this has changed in differnt gerrit versions
17:57:03 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Ironic nodes with instance reserved in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867912
17:58:41 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Ironic nodes with instance reserved in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867913
18:00:29 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Ironic nodes with instance reserved in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867914
18:06:05 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Ironic nodes with instance reserved in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867913
18:07:48 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Ironic nodes with instance reserved in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867914
18:10:09 sean-k-mooney those all look good bauzas if you are around the next few days can you review them and babysit those through the gate
18:12:04 rloo sean-k-mooney: thx for reviewing them. now i feel like i should do more upstream stuff before i forget. ha ha. (I might backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/842478 just for fun, we don't have a need for that. yet.)
18:12:57 sean-k-mooney so my understandign is taht should not be needed with the fix you have backported
18:13:18 sean-k-mooney rloo: well it would be good to have if you disable the fix you backported
18:13:30 sean-k-mooney so i guess if you dont have cleaning and dont want the extra time
18:13:37 sean-k-mooney then having both might make sense
18:14:26 sean-k-mooney so looking at it quikly it shoudl be backportable too so if you want too go for it
18:15:06 rloo we have cleaning and we don't put nodes in maint often. but i could see that being useful for others, and who knows, we might want it. The trick is getting my downstream stuff done so I have time to do some upstream stuff ;)
18:16:04 sean-k-mooney i know that feeling right now my upstream time is 99% reviews currently
18:16:06 sean-k-mooney well and irc
18:16:48 rloo wow, i appreciate that and I'm sure others do to sean-k-mooney! Just don't burn out on that.
18:17:29 sean-k-mooney well its how i can best supprot the rest of the team
18:17:44 rloo ++++
18:18:09 sean-k-mooney i could write a bunch of code but i know it wont get reviewed quickly so while my upstream time is limited im puting it to reviews to enabel other to land there fixes
18:19:44 sean-k-mooney rloo: by the way if the ironic folks ever want to turn there json rpc impl into an oslo messaging dirver so we can deploy nova without rabbit... i would not be upset
18:22:13 sean-k-mooney zigo: are you still persuing ^
18:22:40 sean-k-mooney i ocationally look at https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:asyncio-nats but you know time
19:14:43 rloo sean-k-mooney: that is a great idea, might be good if you mentioned it in the ironic channel. problem is so few people, so many things we'd like to do. but worth it if we can get rid of rabbit....
19:32:44 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Ironic: retry when node not available https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867924
21:27:45 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Ironic: retry when node not available https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868010
21:30:13 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Ironic: retry when node not available https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868010
21:30:53 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Ironic: retry when node not available https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868011
21:33:04 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: Ironic: retry when node not available https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868011
21:33:33 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Ironic: retry when node not available https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868012
21:36:15 opendevreview Ruby Loo proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Ironic: retry when node not available https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868012
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-17
17:01:30 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/zed: Ironic nodes with instance reserved in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867642
17:12:33 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Make allocation candidates available for scheduler filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854119
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-19
02:26:44 congnt sean-k-mooney: Hi, what libvirt version fixed issue about Icelake without flag mpx? Thanks
02:40:22 congnt And what file xml in new libvirt version I can use for Icelake no mpx? I saw in libvirt 8.0, x86_Icelake-Server-noTSX.xml still have mpx flags. Thank you
08:43:30 opendevreview Nobuhiro MIKI proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add maxphysaddr support for Libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/861033
11:24:32 opendevreview Jorge San Emeterio proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Review usage of oslo-privsep library on Nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/865432
12:22:44 sean-k-mooney i said this downstream but if im needed ping my matirx accout here sean-k-mooney[m] ill be disconencting my irc client until the new year when im back form pto
12:41:42 opendevreview Jan Hartkopf proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose spec for updating user data https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/863884
14:03:44 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Adds a repoducer for post_live_migration_at_destination failures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868088
14:03:44 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Fix bug ... https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868089
14:05:37 Uggla Hi gibi, could you have a look at the above patches ^
14:22:22 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Adds a repoducer for post_live_migration_at_destination failures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868088
14:22:23 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Fix bug 2000069 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868089
14:32:48 gibi Uggla: you were faster, I've just left comment in the fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868089
14:33:06 gibi but for the previous ps
14:33:24 Uggla gibi, yep I have seen them. And realize how dumb I am.
14:33:58 gibi Uggla: you are not dump, I think your reproducer and fix is correct. I only have minor nits
14:34:28 gibi I will be off after today, so if you can respin it still today then I can +2 it
14:35:05 gibi and then we can pull in bauzas to +A it :)
14:36:14 Uggla yep fixing it ASAP. Note: I have opened a nova bug on launchpad as well and assigned it to me. I think it is what is expected in this case.
14:39:54 gibi yepp
14:40:17 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Adds a repoducer for post_live_migration_at_destination failures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868088
14:40:17 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Fix bug 2000069 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868089
14:56:05 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Adds a repoducer for post_live_migration_at_destination failures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868088
14:56:05 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Fix bug 2000069 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868089
15:00:10 Uggla gibi, that should be ok now.
15:02:16 gibi Uggla: I'm +2 on both
15:04:39 Uggla gibi, cool ! hoping it will be ok for bauzas, but it is easier I can give him a chocolate bribe. :D
15:05:18 gibi :)
15:11:32 bauzas Uggla: gibi: sorry, focusing on finishing the cpu impl series
15:11:42 bauzas but I can try to look
15:14:08 bauzas Uggla: hmmm, I'm a bit torn about using an existing regression test
15:15:21 bauzas because if you want to backport a bugfix, it's simplier to have a specific regression test file
15:15:37 Uggla bauzas, I thought to create a new file, but it is more or less the same subject. That's the reason why I appended to the existing one.
15:16:12 bauzas Uggla: the problem is about backporting
15:16:44 Uggla bauzas, I understand if you wish I can split in another file.
15:17:50 bauzas Uggla: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868088
15:18:46 bauzas Uggla: I don't know if you want to backport the fix down to Train or if the existing regression file is on Train (for example), but here my concern is not really about *this* fix but rather about the usage
15:19:20 bauzas because as a reminder, people sometimes just looks at code and copy/paste what they want without thinking about any reason why we do or we don't this
15:20:10 Uggla ok, I guess it can be backported down to train as soon as Amit patch will be merged.
#openstack-nova - 2022-12-20
01:26:18 opendevreview Lin Yang proposed openstack/os-traits master: setuptools: Disable auto discovery https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/868148
01:26:19 opendevreview Lin Yang proposed openstack/os-traits master: CPU: add traits for new X86 feature "AMX" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/868149
12:55:07 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-traits master: Update python classifier for python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/861466
13:13:17 opendevreview Merged openstack/osc-placement master: Update gate jobs as per the 2023.1 cycle testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/861470
15:03:12 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: add header alingment for PrettyTable 3.4.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855658
15:03:20 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add os_vif in nova-config-generator https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863891
15:03:30 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Fix link to Cyborg device profiles API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/859578
15:03:38 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: fix typo in architecture document https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/859201
15:05:29 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Correct reST markup in config help string https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/859010
15:05:38 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Modify the command of getting serial console https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850729
16:07:02 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: db: Drop redundant indexes on instances and console_auth_tokens tables https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/856757
16:07:18 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: fix typo in test_config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864641
16:07:26 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Doc: Fix list servers detailed response param https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862963
16:24:48 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Update gate jobs as per the 2023.1 cycle testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/861111
16:24:57 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Improving logging at '_allocate_mdevs'. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/861146
16:25:05 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add a hacking rule for the setDaemon method https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854653

Earlier   Later