Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-11-28
13:07:07 bauzas yup
13:07:11 bauzas but the issue is still present
13:07:19 sean-k-mooney right becaues qemu is broken
13:07:36 bauzas other jobs are failing to due the flakey tempest test I agree
13:08:06 sean-k-mooney so we can either disabel the volume tests or we can make it non voting but we cant really do anythign else in onva
13:08:17 bauzas but for nova-lvm, we get the same exception than previously without depending on the tempest changhe
13:08:18 sean-k-mooney the nova-lvm job is intended to test the lvm image backend
13:08:25 bauzas yeah I know
13:08:27 sean-k-mooney so we dont striclty need to test cinder there
13:09:12 bauzas I don't disagree
13:10:27 bauzas but the failure is also for the rescue tests
13:10:48 bauzas in tearDownClass fixture ending
13:11:14 gokhani hello folks, some of my instances image backing file is deleted unexpectedly. And unfortunately glance image is also deleted. I only see a disk file under /var/lib/nova/instances. is there any way rescue this instances ? I tried using guestfish but it also tries to reach backing file.
13:12:34 gibi bauzas, sean-k-mooney: lets sync with gmann, but sadly I have to agree to disable those tests temprorarily
13:12:58 bauzas gibi: tbh, I don't know which exact cables to unplug
13:13:11 bauzas I mean, I know the cables
13:13:38 bauzas but I wonder if by unplugging them, it would either shutdown the Big Thing or even just Do Nothing
13:14:25 sean-k-mooney you woudl have to disabel all volume related tests more or less
13:14:51 gibi sean-k-mooney: no we don't have to, I think some of those has the wait for sshable thing implemented
13:14:55 sean-k-mooney there is one other tempest serise that might be related
13:15:05 sean-k-mooney gibi: it failed with that
13:15:30 sean-k-mooney i mean the current patch might not work
13:15:34 sean-k-mooney and making it work might be enough
13:15:36 gibi sean-k-mooney: it failed with a tempest patch that adds some sshable flag to some tests. But we already merged a lot of sshable flag patches
13:15:40 sean-k-mooney but the current patch still failed
13:16:06 sean-k-mooney oh i know but bauzas added a depend-on ot the last one in that seriese
13:16:21 bauzas yup
13:16:23 sean-k-mooney so we seam to need somethign else on top of that
13:16:28 gibi yes, taht depends on was for adding sshable for hopefully the last set of volume tests
13:16:35 bauzas yup
13:16:42 gibi that tempest test is not corret yet
13:16:55 gibi but gmann hopefully knows more about it
13:17:15 bauzas I'm just wrapping up all the LP bug reports
13:17:15 gibi so I think we need to disable those volume tests that are failing currently, not all volume tests
13:17:18 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/840410
13:17:26 sean-k-mooney this one might also be interesting ^
13:17:42 gibi yes, we need that too to disable trunk
13:17:49 gibi there we know ralonsoh working on a fix
13:18:11 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/840410 fixes a issue witht he cleanup function ordering
13:18:17 sean-k-mooney related to volumes
13:18:57 gibi sorry i mixed up things
13:19:03 gibi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/840410 is new to me
13:19:06 sean-k-mooney bauzas: could you perhaps also add a depend on for that
13:19:46 gibi probably we need a single nova patch that disables trunk (as in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865658) and disable the failing volume tests
13:20:15 sean-k-mooney ya that would be simpler to merge
13:20:24 bauzas sean-k-mooney: sec, writing an email to inform the world we're busted
13:28:37 bauzas I'm here
13:28:40 bauzas so
13:29:19 sean-k-mooney joing an internal call shortly but https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/840410 may help with the volume issues
13:29:29 sean-k-mooney if you can add that as a second depends on it might help
13:29:34 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I can try
13:29:48 bauzas that's gonna be fun
13:29:54 sean-k-mooney alternitivly we can tempoerly disable the volume tests in the same patch that is skiping the tunk tests
13:30:08 sean-k-mooney and then try that in the followup that turns them back on
13:30:10 bauzas https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-November/031335.html
13:30:41 bauzas ralonsoh: you also have a different tracking bug number for the wrong port state
13:30:59 bauzas ralonsoh: maybe we should merge those 2 bug reports we have
13:31:21 bauzas sean-k-mooney: editing inline in gerrit, so we'll see
13:32:55 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Skip live_migration_with_trunk tempest test on ovs-hybrid and nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865658
13:39:54 ralonsoh bauzas, yes, one sec
13:40:43 ralonsoh bauzas, https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1997025
13:40:51 ralonsoh patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/837780
13:41:48 ralonsoh I've increased the priority of th ereview
13:41:50 bauzas ralonsoh: would you disagree if I'm closing https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1997025 as duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1940425 which was already triaged for Neutron ?
13:42:19 ralonsoh bauzas, that issue was something different
13:42:41 ralonsoh in https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1997025, the port is not activated
13:42:49 ralonsoh and this is because of the os-vif release
13:43:02 bauzas Hmmm, OK
13:43:12 ralonsoh --> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1997025/comments/1
14:46:55 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Skip live_migration_with_trunk tempest test on ovs-hybrid and nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865658
14:47:37 bauzas yet another try ^
14:47:58 bauzas the previous run was failing
17:13:09 bauzas sean-k-mooney: gibi: so, I'm about to skip the nova-lvm tests that fail
17:13:53 bauzas fwiw, nova-grenade-multinode also hits the port not active isue https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/16cc990d758348999cc5c1b2b30aa9a2
17:15:11 gibi bauzas: ack
17:18:55 ralonsoh bauzas, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/837780
17:19:02 ralonsoh we have merged the patch in Neutron
17:19:08 ralonsoh I think you should be OK now
17:19:12 ralonsoh (I hope so)
17:19:35 bauzas ah, nice to hear
17:19:45 bauzas I can try to recheck my original patch
17:19:56 bauzas ralonsoh: kudos to the neutron team
17:20:00 ralonsoh yw
17:25:01 sean-k-mooney ralonsoh ah an ye removed the config option great
17:25:06 sean-k-mooney then it should just work
17:25:15 sean-k-mooney without us needing to modify jobs
17:25:20 ralonsoh yes referring to the Nova patch
17:26:08 bauzas ralonsoh: sean-k-mooney: I just rechecked https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/838976/8
17:26:12 bauzas we will see
17:26:24 ralonsoh bauzas, I'll keep an eye on it
17:26:39 sean-k-mooney bauzas: we still need to skip the lvm tests
17:26:41 sean-k-mooney right
17:26:43 bauzas either way, it will fail due to the nova-lvm issue but we'll see whether ovn and nova-next jobs work
17:26:50 bauzas sean-k-mooney: yup
17:27:04 bauzas this is just for checking against something which is not my skiptest patch
17:27:17 sean-k-mooney ya ok well it might pass put its unlikely to do it twice to get passed both gate and check
17:27:28 bauzas yup
17:27:39 bauzas nova-lvm seems to fail 100% of times
17:29:19 sean-k-mooney is nova-lvm using pc or q35 by the way i assume pc
17:30:33 sean-k-mooney the ohter thing we could try is putting it back to focal temporilly

Earlier   Later