Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-10-06
09:47:17 sean-k-mooney[m] gokhanisi: so it sounds like you have somethign else in your cloud that is doing that
09:47:51 sean-k-mooney[m] deleting the glance image will have no effect on running vms
09:49:00 sean-k-mooney[m] evacuate may fail if the image is deleted and the vm is not on shared sotrage as it wont be able to download the image but reboots and normal move operations like cold/live migrate will work
10:56:55 auniyal_ Hello #openstack-nova
10:57:00 auniyal_ please review these:
10:57:02 auniyal_ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854979
10:57:07 auniyal_ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854980
10:57:34 auniyal_ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858673
11:43:26 sean-k-mooney bauzas: care to be the second reviewer on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827467
11:51:06 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: update default overcommit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830829
11:52:20 sean-k-mooney gibi: stephenfin johnthetubaguy ^ care to take a look at that. im hoping we can merge that sooner rather then later
11:55:11 opendevreview Kirill proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: GCLOUD2-6989:vnc workable varsion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860555
11:55:53 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Add NovaSoftDeleteObject mixin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854355
11:55:53 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Validate object-DB model field parity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860556
12:00:17 opendevreview Kirill proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: add support of vnc console for ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860557
12:09:53 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Fix typos in nova docs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858673
12:14:37 gibi sean-k-mooney: I'm +2
12:19:56 stephenfin Me too. Low risk since as you note, these are the _initial_ ratios and therefore only affect new resources
12:21:39 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I can look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827467
12:22:19 bauzas stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: I don't really want to discuss at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860401 for the moment, as I have the OpenInfra Live session in 2 hours
12:22:36 bauzas stephenfin: sean-k-mooney: but if you want, we can discuss this tomorro<
13:03:18 sean-k-mooney bauzas: there is no really rush. so focus on the talk
13:04:16 sean-k-mooney anyone else can also reveiw https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/827467 by the way i just pinnged you since i tought you might be around
13:04:44 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860401 also can wait till the ptg
13:04:56 sean-k-mooney or we can chat about it tomrrow or next week
13:43:39 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Remove deleted projects from flavor access list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/849131
14:41:27 frickler fyi neutron broke integrated CI, they are working on a fix
14:52:28 sean-k-mooney fun
14:54:39 sean-k-mooney frickler: by the way were you asking about zuul and devstack recently
14:54:54 sean-k-mooney i think we have a bug in our new default policy
14:55:12 sean-k-mooney its blocking people with member form callign the server detail api
14:56:49 frickler sean-k-mooney: that doesn't ring a bell for me
14:57:36 sean-k-mooney it was proably corvus or clarkb
14:57:52 sean-k-mooney basically i repodcued it when i redeploy my home cloud and zuul
14:58:10 sean-k-mooney im not sure if its a nova issue or zuul one but it breaks
14:58:19 sean-k-mooney ill hop on the zuul matrix and follow up later
15:06:05 lajoskatona frickler: Hi, could you point to the failure, perhaps also on neutron channel?
15:07:28 frickler lajoskatona: ralonsoh is on it, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/860577 should be the fix
15:08:25 lajoskatona frickler: thanks
15:08:41 ralonsoh I've sent an email right now
15:24:19 opendevreview Vladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/nova master: Nova instance snapshot should wait for volumes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/848638
15:54:59 dansmith bauzas: did you see that we're in conflict with the cinder ops hour?
15:55:22 bauzas dansmith: if so, they added it after ours
15:55:30 dansmith yeah I know
15:55:33 bauzas I just took a placeholder
15:55:52 bauzas and thanks for the notice, haven't seen it yet
15:56:55 bauzas dansmith: at least we'll have one hour for us
15:57:14 dansmith bauzas: could we move ours easily?
15:57:35 bauzas dansmith: problem is, I already published it in the openinfra live episode today
15:57:48 dansmith cinder moving at this point might be difficult, so even though we were first, if we're flexible we probably should be
15:57:58 dansmith yeah, that's unfortunate.. did cinder do the same?
15:58:01 bauzas no
15:58:06 dansmith heh
15:58:16 bauzas hence me thinking cinder would be easier to move
15:58:24 dansmith whoami-rajat: ^ thoughts?
15:58:40 bauzas and that's a 2-hour slot for ops
15:59:22 bauzas so, moving the operator slot is actually moving *two* hours for nova
15:59:42 bauzas again, I'd prefer cinder to move his slot by one hour
16:00:15 bauzas and if they can't, well, as we have 2 hours on that day, that'd be unfortunate but operators wanting to attend both could still be able to discuss with nova for one hour
16:00:50 dansmith bauzas: okay so the placeholders were just one hour I think,
16:01:02 dansmith so you must have chosen the placeholder and placeholder+1 right?
16:01:11 bauzas can't remember sorry how I booked
16:01:25 bauzas the eavesdrop logs could tell me tho :)
16:01:33 bauzas but yeah, probablyu
16:01:45 dansmith well, cinder chose one of the placeholders, so they feel like they did the right thing
16:01:52 bauzas so, nova has two slots back-to-back on tues 1-3
16:02:01 dansmith but maybe it's less of a problem because we only have an hour overlap for the second hour
16:02:02 bauzas cinder has one slot 2-3
16:02:07 bauzas zactly
16:02:17 dansmith so it was *nova* that caused the conflict :)
16:02:41 bauzas I pledge non-guilty
16:02:44 bauzas :D
16:03:05 dansmith I judge you guilty regardless :)
16:03:06 bauzas I won't say anything by now till I have a lawyer, sir.
16:03:23 dansmith does france have protection against self-incrimination?
16:03:54 bauzas we have a "non-guilty, always innocent until proven" policy
16:04:07 dansmith yeah that's not the same :)
16:04:34 bauzas damn you, I'm grabbing the logs :p
16:04:55 dansmith bauzas: maybe we should just drop ours down to the first hour then to avoid conflict, since that was the ask from the TC?
16:05:07 bauzas also, just noted that there is a conflicting operator placeholder on Monday 1-2pm too
16:05:21 dansmith we could have another bonus slot later, which might be better anyway for people not free in that two-hour slot
16:05:28 bauzas frankly, I don't know how the placeholders were provided
16:05:45 dansmith I don't see a conflict on monday
16:06:13 bauzas did I say Monday ?
16:06:15 bauzas shit.
16:06:19 bauzas speaking of Tuesday
16:07:14 dansmith that should be our slot
16:07:26 dansmith perhaps we didn't remove the slot we took when we moved it to our room?
16:07:47 dansmith we should probably do that to avoid another conflict
16:07:52 dansmith gmann: can you advise?
16:09:05 bauzas but yeah, I guess I took the two slots and haven't deleted the placeholders
16:09:06 gmann bauzas: yeah, if we can avoid the conflict with cinder
16:09:25 bauzas personally, I'd like to run a 2-hour session
16:09:32 bauzas one hour is too stretchy
16:09:35 dansmith bauzas: at this point I think we should just claim the first slot that we took at 13UTC, shrink to 1h to avoid the overlap
16:09:43 gmann nova has 3 operator-hours
16:09:49 bauzas for good reason
16:09:57 bauzas a 2-hour session for having time
16:10:08 bauzas and another hour for people not being to join on Tues
16:10:16 bauzas being able*

Earlier   Later