| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-10-06 | |||
| 14:52:28 | sean-k-mooney | fun | |
| 14:54:39 | sean-k-mooney | frickler: by the way were you asking about zuul and devstack recently | |
| 14:54:54 | sean-k-mooney | i think we have a bug in our new default policy | |
| 14:55:12 | sean-k-mooney | its blocking people with member form callign the server detail api | |
| 14:56:49 | frickler | sean-k-mooney: that doesn't ring a bell for me | |
| 14:57:36 | sean-k-mooney | it was proably corvus or clarkb | |
| 14:57:52 | sean-k-mooney | basically i repodcued it when i redeploy my home cloud and zuul | |
| 14:58:10 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure if its a nova issue or zuul one but it breaks | |
| 14:58:19 | sean-k-mooney | ill hop on the zuul matrix and follow up later | |
| 15:06:05 | lajoskatona | frickler: Hi, could you point to the failure, perhaps also on neutron channel? | |
| 15:07:28 | frickler | lajoskatona: ralonsoh is on it, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/860577 should be the fix | |
| 15:08:25 | lajoskatona | frickler: thanks | |
| 15:08:41 | ralonsoh | I've sent an email right now | |
| 15:24:19 | opendevreview | Vladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/nova master: Nova instance snapshot should wait for volumes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/848638 | |
| 15:54:59 | dansmith | bauzas: did you see that we're in conflict with the cinder ops hour? | |
| 15:55:22 | bauzas | dansmith: if so, they added it after ours | |
| 15:55:30 | dansmith | yeah I know | |
| 15:55:33 | bauzas | I just took a placeholder | |
| 15:55:52 | bauzas | and thanks for the notice, haven't seen it yet | |
| 15:56:55 | bauzas | dansmith: at least we'll have one hour for us | |
| 15:57:14 | dansmith | bauzas: could we move ours easily? | |
| 15:57:35 | bauzas | dansmith: problem is, I already published it in the openinfra live episode today | |
| 15:57:48 | dansmith | cinder moving at this point might be difficult, so even though we were first, if we're flexible we probably should be | |
| 15:57:58 | dansmith | yeah, that's unfortunate.. did cinder do the same? | |
| 15:58:01 | bauzas | no | |
| 15:58:06 | dansmith | heh | |
| 15:58:16 | bauzas | hence me thinking cinder would be easier to move | |
| 15:58:24 | dansmith | whoami-rajat: ^ thoughts? | |
| 15:58:40 | bauzas | and that's a 2-hour slot for ops | |
| 15:59:22 | bauzas | so, moving the operator slot is actually moving *two* hours for nova | |
| 15:59:42 | bauzas | again, I'd prefer cinder to move his slot by one hour | |
| 16:00:15 | bauzas | and if they can't, well, as we have 2 hours on that day, that'd be unfortunate but operators wanting to attend both could still be able to discuss with nova for one hour | |
| 16:00:50 | dansmith | bauzas: okay so the placeholders were just one hour I think, | |
| 16:01:02 | dansmith | so you must have chosen the placeholder and placeholder+1 right? | |
| 16:01:11 | bauzas | can't remember sorry how I booked | |
| 16:01:25 | bauzas | the eavesdrop logs could tell me tho :) | |
| 16:01:33 | bauzas | but yeah, probablyu | |
| 16:01:45 | dansmith | well, cinder chose one of the placeholders, so they feel like they did the right thing | |
| 16:01:52 | bauzas | so, nova has two slots back-to-back on tues 1-3 | |
| 16:02:01 | dansmith | but maybe it's less of a problem because we only have an hour overlap for the second hour | |
| 16:02:02 | bauzas | cinder has one slot 2-3 | |
| 16:02:07 | bauzas | zactly | |
| 16:02:17 | dansmith | so it was *nova* that caused the conflict :) | |
| 16:02:41 | bauzas | I pledge non-guilty | |
| 16:02:44 | bauzas | :D | |
| 16:03:05 | dansmith | I judge you guilty regardless :) | |
| 16:03:06 | bauzas | I won't say anything by now till I have a lawyer, sir. | |
| 16:03:23 | dansmith | does france have protection against self-incrimination? | |
| 16:03:54 | bauzas | we have a "non-guilty, always innocent until proven" policy | |
| 16:04:07 | dansmith | yeah that's not the same :) | |
| 16:04:34 | bauzas | damn you, I'm grabbing the logs :p | |
| 16:04:55 | dansmith | bauzas: maybe we should just drop ours down to the first hour then to avoid conflict, since that was the ask from the TC? | |
| 16:05:07 | bauzas | also, just noted that there is a conflicting operator placeholder on Monday 1-2pm too | |
| 16:05:21 | dansmith | we could have another bonus slot later, which might be better anyway for people not free in that two-hour slot | |
| 16:05:28 | bauzas | frankly, I don't know how the placeholders were provided | |
| 16:05:45 | dansmith | I don't see a conflict on monday | |
| 16:06:13 | bauzas | did I say Monday ? | |
| 16:06:15 | bauzas | shit. | |
| 16:06:19 | bauzas | speaking of Tuesday | |
| 16:07:14 | dansmith | that should be our slot | |
| 16:07:26 | dansmith | perhaps we didn't remove the slot we took when we moved it to our room? | |
| 16:07:47 | dansmith | we should probably do that to avoid another conflict | |
| 16:07:52 | dansmith | gmann: can you advise? | |
| 16:09:05 | bauzas | but yeah, I guess I took the two slots and haven't deleted the placeholders | |
| 16:09:06 | gmann | bauzas: yeah, if we can avoid the conflict with cinder | |
| 16:09:25 | bauzas | personally, I'd like to run a 2-hour session | |
| 16:09:32 | bauzas | one hour is too stretchy | |
| 16:09:35 | dansmith | bauzas: at this point I think we should just claim the first slot that we took at 13UTC, shrink to 1h to avoid the overlap | |
| 16:09:43 | gmann | nova has 3 operator-hours | |
| 16:09:49 | bauzas | for good reason | |
| 16:09:57 | bauzas | a 2-hour session for having time | |
| 16:10:08 | bauzas | and another hour for people not being to join on Tues | |
| 16:10:16 | bauzas | being able* | |
| 16:10:18 | gmann | how about shifting thosw to wed ? | |
| 16:10:31 | gmann | 2 hours continuous | |
| 16:10:37 | bauzas | gmann: again, I took those dates far in advance and I communicated them multiple times | |
| 16:10:58 | bauzas | I can move, but honestly I feel bad about it | |
| 16:11:24 | dansmith | it's unfortunate but we're just trying to resolve the issue | |
| 16:11:27 | gmann | ohk let's wait for whoami-rajat if they can shift their by an hour | |
| 16:11:51 | bauzas | and that's unfortunate, but I've just said the slots in https://youtu.be/MSbB3L9_MeY | |
| 16:12:17 | gmann | whoami-rajat: I know we talked about it in event channel but is it possible to move operator-cinder-hour at 15 UTC on tuesday ? | |
| 16:13:07 | bauzas | https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-09-06-16.00.html | |
| 16:13:16 | bauzas | that's where we agreed on the dates | |
| 16:13:41 | bauzas | and that's what I did for booking https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openinfra-events/%23openinfra-events.2022-09-06.log.html | |
| 16:14:14 | dansmith | bauzas: at the end of the day we just need to resolve the conflict | |
| 16:14:15 | gmann | sure, let's wait for whoami-rajat reply. it is ~10 PM for him so may be tomorrow morning. | |
| 16:14:17 | bauzas | I freed two slots we had reserved | |
| 16:14:31 | bauzas | dansmith: yeah, but I'm trying to understand how I ended up in such mes | |
| 16:14:33 | bauzas | mess | |
| 16:14:59 | bauzas | dansmith: I'm looking for alternatively moving the operator session by Thursday | |
| 16:15:39 | gmann | I think we planned for single slot of a hour and nova booking for 2 hours end up having conflict | |
| 16:16:01 | gmann | but 2 hours slot is not bad with the reason bauzas mentioned | |
| 16:16:19 | bauzas | OK, I think I got it | |
| 16:16:20 | bauzas | https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openinfra-events/%23openinfra-events.2022-09-08.log.html | |
| 16:16:25 | gmann | may be next time we can have some 2 hours slot as placeholder too so that we can avoid this | |
| 16:16:43 | bauzas | I haven't really converted the operator placeholders, I just reused some slots I booked | |
| 16:17:06 | bauzas | and then, whoami-rajat just took the placeholder for cinder | |
| 16:17:13 | bauzas | hence the problem | |
| 16:17:22 | gmann | yeah | |
| 16:17:38 | bauzas | I should have unbooked the placeholder before | |