Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-09-12
12:52:58 sean-k-mooney but you are probaly hitting that
12:53:32 sean-k-mooney we shoudl not be waiting for the network vif plugged event if you have a specic set of patches.
12:54:37 sean-k-mooney noonedeadpunk: do you have https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/66c7f00e1d9d7c0eebe46eb4b24b2b21f7413789
12:56:01 gibi zigo: ack, let me know if I can help somehow
12:56:23 sean-k-mooney when we adressed https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1895220 it intoduced https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1952003 which orginially fixed https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1832028 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1833902
12:57:49 sean-k-mooney noonedeadpunk: https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/0b0f40d1b308b29da537859b72080488560c23d4 is in yoga
12:58:07 noonedeadpunk sean-k-mooney: I do have https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/66c7f00e1d9d7c0eebe46eb4b24b2b21f7413789
12:58:41 noonedeadpunk I guess I don't have I3cb39a9ec2c260f422b3c48122b9db512cdd799b though, as it's Xena
12:58:42 sean-k-mooney noonedeadpunk: what about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828414
12:58:53 sean-k-mooney we backproted it
12:59:03 sean-k-mooney but only 5 months ago
12:59:16 noonedeadpunk Nah, we did not do this minor upgrade
12:59:21 noonedeadpunk Let me check it out
12:59:55 sean-k-mooney im not sure if we have done a release since then
13:00:24 noonedeadpunk Gerrit says you did :p
13:00:41 noonedeadpunk But we run 24.0.1.dev10, and it's included in 24.1.1
13:00:43 sean-k-mooney no it say we merge it
13:00:54 sean-k-mooney where did you see that in gerrit
13:01:14 noonedeadpunk three dots in upper right corner -> included in
13:01:44 sean-k-mooney oh wow didnt know that was a thing
13:02:26 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/releases/commit/ac4be06827ec7a450233244d8c5cae8834b95ffc
13:02:29 noonedeadpunk it was there even in gerrit 2
13:02:37 sean-k-mooney but yes we did that on 21st jun
13:03:01 sean-k-mooney never used it i normally just check the release in github
13:04:47 sean-k-mooney noonedeadpunk: so ya soory i think its https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1952003
13:05:17 sean-k-mooney on the pluse side if it is then you just need to do the minor update when you have time too
13:18:28 noonedeadpunk ah, bug report is indeed super familiar
13:29:17 zigo gibi: Building Eventlet, I still get this:
13:29:17 zigo https://paste.opendev.org/show/bIinQaPTAy81Uac3ZPHS/
13:29:17 zigo After a lot of head-scratching, I can't get how to fix it (note: I already cherry-picked https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/pull/754/commits/cd2532168e33d892de625f9fc831bf0951f4e937 the collections.abc.Iterable one, and another about ssl_version=ssl.PROTOCOL_TLSv1_2).
13:29:58 zigo The send_method object contains what, in fact?
13:30:11 zigo I see it's self.fd.send_method or something ...
13:43:33 gibi I looked at it but I have no ideas either on that
14:14:18 noonedeadpunk sean-k-mooney: seems that patch revert does work, thanks a lot!
14:16:17 sean-k-mooney we had 3 or 4 supper niche edgcases that we resolve and unfortetly it took use a while to relase that that was nolonger required after we fixed that previous bug
14:16:34 sean-k-mooney noonedeadpunk: im glad this is working for you
14:34:56 zigo gibi: In oslo.concurrency, I tried reverting "Fix fair internal lock used from eventlet.spawn_n" and it was still stuck, so now I'm trying to revert "Prove that spawn_n with fair lock is broken" ...
14:35:35 sean-k-mooney zigo: just an an fyi that fix is needed
14:35:49 sean-k-mooney zigo: without it none of the fair logs in nova actully work
14:36:07 zigo You mean the "Fix fair internal lock used from eventlet.spawn_n" ?
14:36:14 sean-k-mooney yes
14:36:24 sean-k-mooney that is required for correctness
14:36:26 zigo Right, though it doesn't seem to be the brokenness ...
14:36:31 sean-k-mooney ack
14:39:43 zigo It passed ...
14:40:27 zigo Removing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.concurrency/+/855713 fixed my issue.
14:42:49 gibi as I noted earlier you are probably running those test ^^ without monkey patching hence the they stuck
14:43:20 gibi you have no better option now but removing those tests
14:43:38 gibi but you still have to keep the fix form "Fix fair internal lock used from eventlet.spawn_n"as sean-k-mooney noted
14:44:30 zigo I did.
14:45:09 zigo gibi: Is it possible that I'm running into this problem because I'm not doing `TEST_EVENTLET=0 lockutils-wrapper` before stestr run ?
14:45:23 gibi zigo: yes, I think so
14:45:29 zigo Ok, will try.
14:46:16 zigo Thanks.
14:57:13 zigo Indeed, that looks like fixing the issue, thanks gibi! :)
14:58:08 gibi as a follow up we need a better handling of those test in oslo.concurrency. The eventlet specific test should be skipped if TEST_EVENTLET is not requested
15:11:42 zigo I'd prefer if the whole unit test suite was failing with a TEST_EVENTLET is not set ...
15:11:56 zigo This way, a guy like me would know what to do... :)
15:12:02 zigo (just my 2 cents of advice...)
15:27:15 opendevreview Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova master: [doc] Add os_vif configuration options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857202
15:27:27 gibi zigo: yeah it is not helpful if the test just stuck
22:10:17 JayF So heads up, it looks like there might be some persistent failure in stable/yoga: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854257 the openstacksdk functional job has failed almost every time on this change (and it's clearly unrelated)
22:10:49 JayF I didn't see it mentioned on the etherpad so I figured I'd mention it here. I'm not too attached to that patch specifically anymore (all the things we know need backporting from Ironic driver have been) -- but it works well as a test case to see the failures.
#openstack-nova - 2022-09-13
08:24:11 Uggla sean-k-mooney[m], can you please recall me the link to your devstack installation tool using ansible + molecule ?
09:39:30 whoami-rajat hi sean-k-mooney , can you take a look at the comment here? basically stephenfin wants to rename the parameter to reimage-boot-volume and add a negative parameter along with it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/831014/7/openstackclient/compute/v2/server.py#3095
10:32:23 zigo I'm reading Nova release notes for Zed, and saw the thingy about hw:locked_memory. I wonder: what's the point of this feature? In which case one would want the memory to be locked, and to achieve what? Is this a security feature?
10:36:43 sean-k-mooney zigo: o/
10:37:01 zigo :)
10:37:06 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Adds check if blk_dev_info has correct falvor.swap https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857339
10:37:49 sean-k-mooney zigo: it was added for the viommu feature not because it requires it but on some aarch64 systems we needed to lock the memoy so that the acclerator could properly do a dma transfer
10:38:41 sean-k-mooney on x86 in general you dont need to do it at least when booting with pci device passhtough libvit will lock enough for the inital devices
10:38:55 zigo Oh, I see... So that's related to HW accelleration. Makes sense.
10:39:02 sean-k-mooney zigo: it was already used implictly when you enabled realtime cpus
10:39:27 sean-k-mooney yep locking the memory marks it as unswappable and unmovable
10:44:54 sean-k-mooney most of the time you do not need that kind of guarentee
10:44:54 sean-k-mooney anything else catch your eye?
10:44:54 sean-k-mooney but if you do now you can
12:25:17 opendevreview Konrad Gube proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add API for assisted volume extend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855490
12:42:04 opendevreview Bence Romsics proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Revert "Revert resize: wait for events according to hybrid plug" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857423
12:58:03 opendevreview Bence Romsics proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Revert "Revert resize: wait for events according to hybrid plug" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857427
13:30:10 opendevreview Konrad Gube proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add API for assisted volume extend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855490
14:23:46 opendevreview Konrad Gube proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add API for assisted volume extend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855490
15:17:35 bauzas reminder : nova meeting in 43 mins
15:17:39 bauzas here*
15:33:17 elodilles bauzas: i'll do a quick update now to the stable section if you are not editing right now the agenda on the meeting page
15:34:14 bauzas elodilles: do it now, I was working on the prelude change so I didn't had time yet to edit it
15:39:08 elodilles bauzas: ack, thanks, done
15:39:23 bauzas elodilles: ok, will do it now
15:42:48 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Prelude section for Zed release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857467
16:00:11 gibi o/
16:00:12 elodilles o/
16:00:17 gibi heh
16:00:18 gibi :)
16:00:19 Uggla o/
16:00:23 sean-k-mooney o/
16:00:26 gibi we are too fast
16:00:38 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:38 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Sep 13 16:00:38 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:38 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:38 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'

Earlier   Later