Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-09-13
10:32:23 zigo I'm reading Nova release notes for Zed, and saw the thingy about hw:locked_memory. I wonder: what's the point of this feature? In which case one would want the memory to be locked, and to achieve what? Is this a security feature?
10:36:43 sean-k-mooney zigo: o/
10:37:01 zigo :)
10:37:06 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Adds check if blk_dev_info has correct falvor.swap https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857339
10:37:49 sean-k-mooney zigo: it was added for the viommu feature not because it requires it but on some aarch64 systems we needed to lock the memoy so that the acclerator could properly do a dma transfer
10:38:41 sean-k-mooney on x86 in general you dont need to do it at least when booting with pci device passhtough libvit will lock enough for the inital devices
10:38:55 zigo Oh, I see... So that's related to HW accelleration. Makes sense.
10:39:02 sean-k-mooney zigo: it was already used implictly when you enabled realtime cpus
10:39:27 sean-k-mooney yep locking the memory marks it as unswappable and unmovable
10:44:54 sean-k-mooney most of the time you do not need that kind of guarentee
10:44:54 sean-k-mooney anything else catch your eye?
10:44:54 sean-k-mooney but if you do now you can
12:25:17 opendevreview Konrad Gube proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add API for assisted volume extend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855490
12:42:04 opendevreview Bence Romsics proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Revert "Revert resize: wait for events according to hybrid plug" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857423
12:58:03 opendevreview Bence Romsics proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Revert "Revert resize: wait for events according to hybrid plug" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857427
13:30:10 opendevreview Konrad Gube proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add API for assisted volume extend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855490
14:23:46 opendevreview Konrad Gube proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add API for assisted volume extend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855490
15:17:35 bauzas reminder : nova meeting in 43 mins
15:17:39 bauzas here*
15:33:17 elodilles bauzas: i'll do a quick update now to the stable section if you are not editing right now the agenda on the meeting page
15:34:14 bauzas elodilles: do it now, I was working on the prelude change so I didn't had time yet to edit it
15:39:08 elodilles bauzas: ack, thanks, done
15:39:23 bauzas elodilles: ok, will do it now
15:42:48 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Prelude section for Zed release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857467
16:00:11 gibi o/
16:00:12 elodilles o/
16:00:17 gibi heh
16:00:18 gibi :)
16:00:19 Uggla o/
16:00:23 sean-k-mooney o/
16:00:26 gibi we are too fast
16:00:38 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:38 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Sep 13 16:00:38 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:38 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:38 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:45 bauzas heh
16:00:47 dansmith o/
16:00:52 bauzas sorry, was finishing to update the agenda :)
16:01:02 bauzas you can raise hands if you want tho
16:01:07 bauzas or meh
16:01:14 bauzas bonjour everyone
16:01:17 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:01:46 bauzas ok, let's start, I'm pretty sure people who started earlier are not already gone
16:01:55 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:02:01 bauzas #info One Critical bug
16:02:07 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1988311 Now u-c updated https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/856044 shall we set to High or close the bug ?
16:02:12 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1988311 Now u-c updated https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/856044 shall we set to High or close the bug ?
16:02:17 bauzas so,
16:02:33 bauzas oslo.concurrency now is released with 5.0.1
16:02:39 bauzas upper-constraints are now updated
16:02:47 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/856044
16:03:26 bauzas I verified and both stable/yoga and master ask for oslo.concurrency older than 4.5.0
16:03:36 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/856044
16:03:41 sean-k-mooney if the locks are now fixed with the oslo release we could clsoe but we need to raise our min verion
16:03:52 bauzas so technically, I haven't checked but our gate uses the latest version
16:04:00 sean-k-mooney otherwise the problem still exstis and we might need to work around it on stable branches in nvoa
16:04:02 bauzas sean-k-mooney: correct, that's my point
16:04:26 sean-k-mooney gibi i assume we will backprot the eventlet fix in oslo
16:04:26 bauzas so we need to bump our mins for both yoga and master
16:04:28 sean-k-mooney to stable
16:04:41 sean-k-mooney we cant bump mins on stable
16:04:53 sean-k-mooney but we need to backport and ensure its allwoed by upper constratis
16:05:01 sean-k-mooney or we need to patch the lock in nova
16:05:05 sean-k-mooney and backprot that
16:05:13 gibi I assume we backport the fix in oslo
16:05:21 sean-k-mooney that would be my prefernce too
16:05:22 gibi but I did not have time to propose that
16:05:37 bauzas ok, at least I propose to set the bug to High
16:05:47 bauzas the gate isn't longer impact, our distros are tho
16:05:49 sean-k-mooney ack
16:05:54 bauzas impacted*
16:05:56 sean-k-mooney well its cloased for master
16:06:02 sean-k-mooney and high for the older brnaches
16:06:16 bauzas not in the Nova project
16:06:32 bauzas I can set a branch series for the bug
16:06:34 sean-k-mooney you want to keep it up for the min version bump
16:06:35 bauzas lemme do it
16:06:39 gibi ack
16:06:39 bauzas correct
16:06:40 bauzas so,
16:06:55 bauzas set to High, open a Yoga series to the bug report and set it to high too
16:07:06 bauzas and ask for the bump in master and the backport in Yoga
16:07:08 bauzas wfy ?
16:07:08 sean-k-mooney +1
16:07:23 bauzas ok, let me do the paperwork
16:07:33 sean-k-mooney well backport in oslo for yoga but yes
16:07:48 gibi looks OK
16:08:31 bauzas done
16:08:39 bauzas moving on
16:08:57 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 5 new untriaged bugs (-4 since the last meeting)
16:09:05 bauzas kudos to Uggla for this excellent work
16:09:10 bauzas #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 26 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement
16:09:16 bauzas #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:09:24 bauzas Uggla: do you want to discuss any bug ?
16:09:41 Uggla bauzas, yes
16:10:18 Uggla bauzas, https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1896617 seems valid for me. I have triaged it.
16:10:40 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Bump min oslo.concurrencty to >= 5.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857491
16:10:49 Uggla But I would like your opinion
16:11:49 bauzas shit
16:12:07 bauzas yeah, if we set the perms

Earlier   Later