Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-09-02
12:05:02 sean-k-mooney ah
12:05:10 sean-k-mooney master is clampped already to 3.3.3
12:05:18 sean-k-mooney 3.3.0
12:05:24 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/upper-constraints.txt#L141
12:06:35 sean-k-mooney frickler: we are not clamping it on master today https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/5b346cf74df6bbfc67f794c053d3c4210da4bacb/global-requirements.txt#L197
12:06:48 sean-k-mooney we just have not merged the update to move it forward form 3.3.0
12:06:54 sean-k-mooney but we have done that on yoga
12:07:07 sean-k-mooney presumable this can break all branches
12:07:31 sean-k-mooney so we shoudl definlaly also clamp it on master to prevent breaking the gat during FF
12:08:24 sean-k-mooney elodilles: gibi ^
12:09:10 gibi sean-k-mooney: it is known and intentionally not updated on master by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/854862/2..3/upper-constraints.txt
12:09:33 gibi sean-k-mooney: we are pinned to 3.3.0 on master at the moment
12:09:46 sean-k-mooney where
12:10:09 sean-k-mooney that goign to get overrided when the bot runs
12:10:15 gibi https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/upper-constraints.txt#L141
12:11:02 gibi sean-k-mooney: this all happend already. the bot ran and update the constraint, the nova job failed on the requirements patch, and then frickler removed the bump from the patch
12:11:28 sean-k-mooney hum ok
12:11:40 gibi frickler even pinged us during the weekend about it :)
12:11:44 sean-k-mooney so instead of pinning it in global-requireemnts where the both will not try to bump it
12:11:53 sean-k-mooney we are pinnign it in the generate file
12:11:58 sean-k-mooney and relaying on the failure
12:12:13 gibi I think it is OK while we wait for the devs to decide if this is a bug or not
12:12:20 sean-k-mooney ok
12:13:53 sean-k-mooney gibi: if they decied its not a bug and dont fix ti we will likely need to disable those tests
12:14:12 sean-k-mooney or rewirte them to not use pretty table
12:14:18 sean-k-mooney unless the assert fails
12:14:54 gibi sure we need to do something with it, but I haven't looked at the tests so I don't know which direction we should go
12:15:23 sean-k-mooney we cant just update the string to the new format as it would fail with older version of pretty table
12:15:34 sean-k-mooney and we cant raise the test requirement on stable
12:15:49 sean-k-mooney so it will need a differnt solution that works with both formats
12:15:49 gibi I do believe we will kep this pinned on stable
12:15:59 gibi keep
12:16:17 sean-k-mooney we could unpin in master and use the new format
12:16:32 sean-k-mooney that would mean that would effectivly be our min version for zed
12:16:36 sean-k-mooney for testing at least
12:16:48 sean-k-mooney i think this is not a runtime requirement
12:16:49 gibi I would not change this for Zed either so close to RC1
12:17:05 gibi as we dont need anything from 3.4.0
12:17:22 sean-k-mooney so pin for both
12:17:27 sean-k-mooney zed and yoga
12:17:37 sean-k-mooney i guess we could do that
12:17:38 gibi probably yes
12:17:52 gibi and understandt the test code then fix it on master
12:19:03 sean-k-mooney this is the current test https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/unit/cmd/test_manage.py#L48-L67
12:19:37 sean-k-mooney so the alieng ment i think changed form left aligned to centered
12:20:45 sean-k-mooney In 3.3.0, the data and header were left-aligned.
12:20:47 sean-k-mooney In 3.4.0, only the data was left-aligned, the header was centre-aligned.
12:21:29 frickler FYI all these blockers are tracked in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/requirements-blockers (at least that's the idea). help to unblock things is always welcome
12:21:32 sean-k-mooney we set the alignment here https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/90e2a5e50fbf08e62a1aedd5e176845ee22d96c9/nova/cmd/manage.py#L124
12:21:59 sean-k-mooney so we might jsut be able to set pt.header_align='l'
12:23:00 sean-k-mooney ill try that quickly and see if it does anything
12:24:26 gibi ack
12:24:46 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for the PCI in placement series https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855185
12:24:46 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Doc follow up for PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855186
12:24:47 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Create RequestGroups from InstancePCIRequests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852771
12:24:47 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support resource_class and traits in PCI alias https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853316
12:24:48 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Split PCI pools per PF https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854440
12:24:48 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Map PCI pools to RP UUIDs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854118
12:24:49 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make allocation candidates available for scheduler filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854119
12:24:50 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Filter PCI pools based on Placement allocation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854120
12:24:50 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Factor out base class for candidate aware filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854929
12:24:52 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Store allocated RP in InstancePCIRequest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854121
12:24:52 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Func test for PCI in placement scheduling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854122
12:24:54 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migrate and resize with PCI tracking in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854247
12:24:54 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support evacuate with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854615
12:24:56 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support unshelve with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854616
12:24:56 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support same host resize with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854441
12:24:58 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test reschedule with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854626
12:24:58 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test multi create with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854663
12:25:00 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Allow enabling PCI scheduling in Placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854924
12:25:00 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rename _to_device_spec_conf to _to_list_of_json_str https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855648
12:25:02 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce PCI pool filtering bug https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855649
12:25:02 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Strictly follow placement allocation during PCI claim https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855650
12:25:04 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for the PCI in placement series https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855654
12:25:09 bauzas sorry folks, I was taxiing again kids and all the likes
12:25:23 bauzas sean-k-mooney: what was your question for me ?
12:25:51 sean-k-mooney its not imporant
12:26:06 sean-k-mooney we had a minor bugfix for palcment and wanted to know if i can merge it
12:26:16 sean-k-mooney after talkign to gibi i +w'd it
12:26:40 gibi stephenfin, sean-k-mooney: I have two FUPs for the merged part of the PCI series. One for the code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855185 and one for the doc https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855186
12:27:04 sean-k-mooney gibi: ack ill take a look
12:27:05 gibi now they are up to date and on the proper base
12:27:09 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks
12:27:10 sean-k-mooney on master
12:27:26 sean-k-mooney or on the last patch that is pending in the gate
12:27:40 gibi on top of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853835 which is being merged
12:27:48 sean-k-mooney ack
12:40:59 sean-k-mooney gibi: frickler ok that works ill push a patch shortly
12:42:34 frickler sean-k-mooney: great, did you confirm with older prettytable, too?
12:42:44 sean-k-mooney yep
12:42:57 sean-k-mooney i have not run all tests to see if it fixes all of them yet
12:43:02 sean-k-mooney but that one test now passes
12:43:14 sean-k-mooney so just adding the header alignemnt seames to work
12:43:35 frickler o.k., nice
12:45:57 gibi sean-k-mooney: sounds good
12:46:07 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add header alingment for PrettyTable 3.4.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855658
12:46:16 sean-k-mooney ill run the full test now locally
12:46:30 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Update the PCI in placement spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/855218
12:47:01 gibi sean-k-mooney, stephenfin: ^^ and this is the update of the Zed spec that sync the spec with the implementation
12:53:50 sean-k-mooney ok that passed unit test localy so it should be good

Earlier   Later