Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-08-29
17:49:41 dansmith yea
17:54:37 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Filter PCI pools based on Placement allocation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854120
17:54:37 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Factor out base class for candidate aware filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854929
17:54:38 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Store allocated RP in InstancePCIRequest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854121
17:54:38 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Func test for PCI in placement scheduling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854122
17:54:39 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migrate and resize with PCI tracking in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854247
17:54:39 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support evacuate with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854615
17:54:40 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support unshelve with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854616
17:54:40 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support same host resize with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854441
17:54:41 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test reschedule with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854626
17:54:42 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test multi create with PCI in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854663
17:54:42 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Allow enabling PCI scheduling in Placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854924
17:54:44 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Enable pci in placement feature https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854925
17:55:18 gibi sean-k-mooney, stephenfin: ^^ I managed to finish all the TODOs in the series
17:55:56 gibi from tomorrow I will start collecting the follow up from already merged patches
17:56:03 sean-k-mooney well done :) i guess i know what im doing tomorrow
17:56:35 gibi but now I need a glass of wine
17:56:44 gibi see you all tomorrow o/.
18:07:59 whoami-rajat sean-k-mooney, dansmith is there going to be an update on 2.93 patch? I'm finalizing tests and pushing changes
18:08:11 dansmith whoami-rajat: yeah, just hold on a bit
18:08:17 whoami-rajat ack
18:08:36 sean-k-mooney the functional test are almost finsihed locally and then ill push likely in the next 60 secons
18:08:44 sean-k-mooney just making sure it will pass ci
18:13:14 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add support for updating server's user_data https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816157
18:13:23 sean-k-mooney whoami-rajat: ^ there you go
18:13:33 whoami-rajat ack
18:13:56 sean-k-mooney this was the fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816157/14..15/nova/tests/unit/api/openstack/compute/test_server_actions.py
18:54:01 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368
18:54:02 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add conductor RPC interface for rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831219
18:54:02 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883
18:58:13 whoami-rajat updated the series however I'm still facing some functional test failure related to green thread queue, I figured it might be my environment so pushed to see what gate thinks
18:58:57 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add documentation and releasenotes for RBAC change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854882
19:02:46 gmann dansmith: ^^ fixed as per review comments
20:14:54 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add documentation and releasenotes for RBAC change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854882
20:15:27 gmann dansmith: ^^ updated, I have fixed your comments
20:15:32 dansmith gmann: looking now
20:16:35 dansmith gmann: done thanks
20:17:46 gmann dansmith: thanks
22:24:00 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add API support for rebuilding BFV instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830883
#openstack-nova - 2022-08-30
06:57:22 bauzas good morning Nova
07:48:27 gibi bauzas: welcome back
07:50:44 bauzas gibi: thanks
09:08:00 gibi the user_data patch looks good to me, but needs a second code. The rebuild of bfv also look good to me but I have some nits that can be fixed in the last patch or as a follow up if needed
09:10:11 gibi I will keep an eye on the manila series
09:10:45 kgube hi, I'm new to Nova development! I've been working on a blueprint+spec that I'd like to submit and get feedback on, but I have been wondering, should I wait with this until after the Zed release?
09:17:21 sean-k-mooney kgube: if its a spec you can submit it to the spec repo now
09:17:39 gibi kgube: welcome!
09:17:41 sean-k-mooney kgube: it might not get much review for the next week or two but you can feel free to create it
09:17:56 gibi kgube: it is a good time to submit the spec as we soon be freed up from Zed and start planning the AA cycle
09:18:29 sean-k-mooney kgube: once we release our first release candiate the master banch will technically be open for the a cycle development
09:18:47 sean-k-mooney although we tend not to merge large changes until the final release is done
09:19:45 gibi kgube: also if the spec is a bit controversial then we can add it to the AA PTG planning to discussit in real time
09:20:15 kgube alright, thanks for the info!
09:20:24 gibi sean-k-mooney: I've replied your question in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853835
09:25:15 sean-k-mooney gibi: thanks ill look again shortly. most o fthe seriese i looked at looks good
09:25:33 sean-k-mooney i see a good split point again about half way through the open patches
09:26:10 sean-k-mooney around here ish https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854440
09:26:44 kgube sean-k-mooney: since AA is not yet available in the spec repo, should I submit it to Zed for now?
09:27:50 sean-k-mooney kgube: you can just creat the directory locally like dan did here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/853837
09:28:09 sean-k-mooney kgube: ill create a patch to do it properly later today
09:28:19 sean-k-mooney and then you can rebase when its merged
09:28:34 sean-k-mooney for now just copy the zed template and use that for the basis of the spec
09:28:39 kgube alright!
09:29:03 sean-k-mooney i dont think we plan to update it for antelope currently
09:34:24 bauzas I was planning to do the AA paperwork right after Zed-3 FWIW
09:35:35 sean-k-mooney ack well that thursday so if you want to create it go for it otherwise ill go create it when i get time
09:35:49 sean-k-mooney we have two things to do for the specs repo
09:35:58 sean-k-mooney one create teh new folder and copy the template
09:36:20 sean-k-mooney two run the script to move/symlink the implemented specs
09:36:41 sean-k-mooney that second task uses the bluepirnt state in launchpad to generate teh list
09:36:59 sean-k-mooney so that is better to wait until next week when everything is updated before we do that
09:40:18 gibi sean-k-mooney: ack
09:52:58 bauzas sean-k-mooney: moving the specs is generally planned for RC1 https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/ptl-guide.html#milestone-3
09:53:17 bauzas I mean approved => implementeds
09:59:47 sean-k-mooney yep
10:00:02 sean-k-mooney that is to account for possible FFEs
10:30:25 sean-k-mooney kgube: what is the thing you have been working on by the way
10:38:47 kgube sean-k-mooney: support for extending attached file-based volumes (such as NFS volumes)
10:39:05 sean-k-mooney oh that shoudl already exists
10:39:23 sean-k-mooney provided the cinder volume supprots it
10:39:40 sean-k-mooney i rememebr that case being speical but i belive it should work
10:40:10 sean-k-mooney ah yes https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/reference/support-matrix.html#operation_online_extend_support
10:40:24 sean-k-mooney Generic NFS Reference Driver (NFS): missing
10:41:04 sean-k-mooney but some vendor nfs drivers supprot it
10:41:06 sean-k-mooney Veritas Cluster NFS Driver (NFS): complete
10:41:12 sean-k-mooney NetApp Data ONTAP Driver (iSCSI, NFS, FC): complete
10:41:27 sean-k-mooney kgube: so that is likely a cidner feature rahter then a nova one
10:41:33 kgube sean-k-mooney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1978294
10:43:16 sean-k-mooney hum
10:43:35 sean-k-mooney im not sure if we really want nova to have logic to resize these volumes on behalf of the backend
10:43:50 sean-k-mooney i guess we can review your proposal
10:44:04 sean-k-mooney but i would proably push this towards os-brick
10:44:12 kgube the logic is already there, though
10:44:21 sean-k-mooney or require the backend driver to do it not nova
10:44:45 kgube its just exposed as an external server event only
10:44:55 sean-k-mooney changing the external events api to be synconous is likely not somethign we can do
10:45:22 kgube The problem is that QEMU has to perform the resize
10:45:35 sean-k-mooney qemu or qemu image
10:45:46 sean-k-mooney *qemu-img
10:46:21 kgube qemu holds a lock on the attached file, which qemu-img respects

Earlier   Later