| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-07-05 | |||
| 16:15:09 | bauzas | but I don't want to discuss one of them by now | |
| 16:15:22 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:15:28 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:15:48 | bauzas | so, the next folk in the roster is artom | |
| 16:16:16 | bauzas | artom: can you be the next bug baton owner, or anyone else ? | |
| 16:17:46 | bauzas | mmm, looks like artom isn't around | |
| 16:17:59 | sean-k-mooney | that means we can give them more work to do right | |
| 16:18:04 | gibi | right :) | |
| 16:18:17 | bauzas | hah | |
| 16:18:18 | gibi | he had on PTO last week so he is well prepared ;) | |
| 16:18:28 | bauzas | I triaged for two weeks | |
| 16:18:33 | bauzas | I paid my duty :D | |
| 16:18:59 | elodilles | i'm not that efficient as others, and probably will be afk 1 day, but can try to have the baton | |
| 16:19:03 | bauzas | (well, actually I triaged every Yoga week, until gibi told we should have a triage team :) ) | |
| 16:19:24 | gibi | I think we can convice artom to take it :) | |
| 16:19:35 | elodilles | gibi: that also works for me :) | |
| 16:19:36 | gibi | he is just probably busy with someting else right now | |
| 16:19:40 | bauzas | let me gently force artom to get the baton :) | |
| 16:19:50 | bauzas | not in a passive aggressive way | |
| 16:19:51 | gibi | lets but it on artom tentatively and we can re-think if he rejects it | |
| 16:19:57 | bauzas | but rather talking with him in French | |
| 16:20:38 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:20:46 | bauzas | #info Next bug baton is passed to artom | |
| 16:20:53 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:20:55 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:21:00 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:21:17 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:21:21 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs | |
| 16:21:28 | bauzas | both weekly jobs run fine | |
| 16:22:03 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:22:08 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:22:14 | bauzas | oh, I forgot to add in the agenda | |
| 16:22:18 | bauzas | we have numbers | |
| 16:22:39 | bauzas | #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-July/029363.html | |
| 16:23:02 | bauzas | #undo | |
| 16:23:02 | opendevmeet | Removing item from minutes: #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-July/029363.html | |
| 16:23:06 | sean-k-mooney | ya nova was not too bad but there are still some | |
| 16:23:27 | bauzas | #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-June/029342.html | |
| 16:24:04 | bauzas | #info 57.75% of rechecks were without a reason, please refrain this wrong behaviour | |
| 16:24:12 | dansmith | ++ | |
| 16:24:52 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:24:56 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:25:00 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html | |
| 16:25:05 | bauzas | #info Zed-2 is in 1.5 weeks | |
| 16:25:09 | bauzas | #info Spec review day today | |
| 16:25:18 | bauzas | well, this was actually a quiet review day | |
| 16:25:27 | bauzas | only 3 specs are currently open to reviews | |
| 16:25:36 | dansmith | I spent a lot of time on the ironic one, | |
| 16:25:43 | bauzas | dansmith: appreciated a lot | |
| 16:25:51 | dansmith | although I'm not sure I'd even call it a spec | |
| 16:25:52 | gibi | yeah the ironic one is the hard piece | |
| 16:26:05 | bauzas | dansmith: I tried to look at it and then I had to stop b/c I had to do bug triage | |
| 16:26:21 | bauzas | dansmith: we basically agreed on the fact this isn't purely a spec | |
| 16:26:27 | dansmith | it's really just brainstorming, so has nothing to do with the spec deadline, IMHO | |
| 16:26:38 | bauzas | it's a document trying to identify all the corner cases about the proposed implementation | |
| 16:26:42 | gibi | depending on an agreed solution we might need a real spec :) | |
| 16:26:45 | bauzas | dansmith: agreed | |
| 16:26:54 | bauzas | on the existing document | |
| 16:26:57 | gibi | but agreed to brainstorm first | |
| 16:27:06 | bauzas | I don't feel it's constrained by the spec approval freeze | |
| 16:27:14 | sean-k-mooney | yep i have not looked at it in a while but its on my todo list at the end | |
| 16:27:16 | sean-k-mooney | after the rest | |
| 16:27:29 | bauzas | but yeah, as gibi said, depending on the consensus we may achieve, this would require some design stage. Or not. | |
| 16:27:43 | dansmith | anything we do would need a spec I'm quite sure, | |
| 16:28:03 | dansmith | I'm just saying, there's no reason to spend time reviewing it instead of other specs before the deadline | |
| 16:28:06 | bauzas | I'll make clear on the gerrit change this one isn't impacted by our deadlines | |
| 16:28:15 | dansmith | I didn't really realize that until it was too late for me, but SAVE YOURSELVES | |
| 16:28:16 | dansmith | :P | |
| 16:28:27 | bauzas | dansmith: honestly, besides this one which is hairy, we only have two opens | |
| 16:28:32 | bauzas | one is about to be merged | |
| 16:28:33 | dansmith | I threw a -1 on it for visibility since all the others were just +0 comments | |
| 16:28:42 | bauzas | and the other one potentially misses resources to work one | |
| 16:28:44 | bauzas | on* | |
| 16:28:46 | dansmith | cool | |
| 16:29:05 | bauzas | so I just feel we can spend brain cycles on the rebalance issue | |
| 16:29:11 | dansmith | ack | |
| 16:29:14 | sean-k-mooney | since it was a braninstromign doc i just didn nto +/- since it did not have any singel proposal | |
| 16:29:32 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I'll clarify the purpose of this document in a gerrit comment | |
| 16:29:34 | sean-k-mooney | but yes ack on the -1 | |
| 16:30:18 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: yeah and that's fair, but someone could stumble in thinking it was needing review before the deadline with no other signaling :D | |
| 16:30:39 | bauzas | I'll send the signal | |
| 16:30:45 | dansmith | ++ | |
| 16:30:56 | bauzas | ideally, I asked CERN folks to jab into it | |
| 16:31:05 | bauzas | but, this is just an ask | |
| 16:31:26 | bauzas | they're impacted by the rebalancing issue as they don't use the ironic feature | |
| 16:31:40 | sean-k-mooney | so in terms of other specs | |
| 16:31:42 | bauzas | so I'd also like to understand whether we could have a mitigation | |
| 16:31:54 | sean-k-mooney | im expecting artom to update theres later this week | |
| 16:32:05 | sean-k-mooney | and ill try and updte teh power managment one | |
| 16:32:11 | sean-k-mooney | but im aware both are late | |
| 16:32:13 | sean-k-mooney | and may slip | |
| 16:32:23 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I left a comment on artom's spec, there could be effort to spend on the EC2 compatible API | |
| 16:32:44 | sean-k-mooney | well ok but im not sure we care about ec2 compat | |
| 16:33:01 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: maybe, but the spec was saying we were given ec2 compat for free | |
| 16:33:08 | bauzas | which isn't true | |
| 16:33:13 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:33:39 | bauzas | for the power management spec, you still have one week to push it | |
| 16:33:57 | bauzas | given we lack of open specs, I could be able to quickly jump into it | |
| 16:33:58 | sean-k-mooney | main issue is reloading context i have not worked on it since febuary | |
| 16:34:02 | bauzas | me too | |