| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-07-05 | |||
| 16:26:45 | bauzas | dansmith: agreed | |
| 16:26:54 | bauzas | on the existing document | |
| 16:26:57 | gibi | but agreed to brainstorm first | |
| 16:27:06 | bauzas | I don't feel it's constrained by the spec approval freeze | |
| 16:27:14 | sean-k-mooney | yep i have not looked at it in a while but its on my todo list at the end | |
| 16:27:16 | sean-k-mooney | after the rest | |
| 16:27:29 | bauzas | but yeah, as gibi said, depending on the consensus we may achieve, this would require some design stage. Or not. | |
| 16:27:43 | dansmith | anything we do would need a spec I'm quite sure, | |
| 16:28:03 | dansmith | I'm just saying, there's no reason to spend time reviewing it instead of other specs before the deadline | |
| 16:28:06 | bauzas | I'll make clear on the gerrit change this one isn't impacted by our deadlines | |
| 16:28:15 | dansmith | I didn't really realize that until it was too late for me, but SAVE YOURSELVES | |
| 16:28:16 | dansmith | :P | |
| 16:28:27 | bauzas | dansmith: honestly, besides this one which is hairy, we only have two opens | |
| 16:28:32 | bauzas | one is about to be merged | |
| 16:28:33 | dansmith | I threw a -1 on it for visibility since all the others were just +0 comments | |
| 16:28:42 | bauzas | and the other one potentially misses resources to work one | |
| 16:28:44 | bauzas | on* | |
| 16:28:46 | dansmith | cool | |
| 16:29:05 | bauzas | so I just feel we can spend brain cycles on the rebalance issue | |
| 16:29:11 | dansmith | ack | |
| 16:29:14 | sean-k-mooney | since it was a braninstromign doc i just didn nto +/- since it did not have any singel proposal | |
| 16:29:32 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I'll clarify the purpose of this document in a gerrit comment | |
| 16:29:34 | sean-k-mooney | but yes ack on the -1 | |
| 16:30:18 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: yeah and that's fair, but someone could stumble in thinking it was needing review before the deadline with no other signaling :D | |
| 16:30:39 | bauzas | I'll send the signal | |
| 16:30:45 | dansmith | ++ | |
| 16:30:56 | bauzas | ideally, I asked CERN folks to jab into it | |
| 16:31:05 | bauzas | but, this is just an ask | |
| 16:31:26 | bauzas | they're impacted by the rebalancing issue as they don't use the ironic feature | |
| 16:31:40 | sean-k-mooney | so in terms of other specs | |
| 16:31:42 | bauzas | so I'd also like to understand whether we could have a mitigation | |
| 16:31:54 | sean-k-mooney | im expecting artom to update theres later this week | |
| 16:32:05 | sean-k-mooney | and ill try and updte teh power managment one | |
| 16:32:11 | sean-k-mooney | but im aware both are late | |
| 16:32:13 | sean-k-mooney | and may slip | |
| 16:32:23 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I left a comment on artom's spec, there could be effort to spend on the EC2 compatible API | |
| 16:32:44 | sean-k-mooney | well ok but im not sure we care about ec2 compat | |
| 16:33:01 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: maybe, but the spec was saying we were given ec2 compat for free | |
| 16:33:08 | bauzas | which isn't true | |
| 16:33:13 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:33:39 | bauzas | for the power management spec, you still have one week to push it | |
| 16:33:57 | bauzas | given we lack of open specs, I could be able to quickly jump into it | |
| 16:33:58 | sean-k-mooney | main issue is reloading context i have not worked on it since febuary | |
| 16:34:02 | bauzas | me too | |
| 16:34:23 | bauzas | but, given Berlin, I think this would be a net win to have it in Nova | |
| 16:34:29 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla's spec i think is close it have one issue with it but it could be adressed in a followup | |
| 16:34:35 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:34:42 | bauzas | let's wrap on the spec discussion | |
| 16:34:50 | bauzas | I'll need to leave the chair soon | |
| 16:34:55 | bauzas | and we can follow up tomorrow | |
| 16:35:03 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:35:09 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:35:25 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/837595 Gerrit policy for Review-prio contributors flag. Waiting for approval | |
| 16:35:53 | bauzas | we should ping the project-config cores | |
| 16:36:05 | bauzas | #link https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/process.html#what-the-review-priority-label-in-gerrit-are-use-for Documentation we already have | |
| 16:36:16 | sean-k-mooney | i can do that after the meeting | |
| 16:36:20 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:36:32 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:36:34 | bauzas | elodilles: your time | |
| 16:36:43 | elodilles | #info stable nova releases are out: yoga (25.0.1), xena (24.1.1) and wallaby (24.1.1) | |
| 16:36:51 | elodilles | #info stable/train is blocked, fix exists but hasn't merged yet due to intermittent failures | |
| 16:37:05 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:37:14 | elodilles | that's it, to be quick | |
| 16:37:37 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:38:02 | bauzas | elodilles: as again, don't be afraid of pinging me for reviews | |
| 16:38:06 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:38:11 | bauzas | (bauzas) Team Sign-up for the next PTG | |
| 16:38:15 | bauzas | so, official ask | |
| 16:38:16 | gibi | yes please | |
| 16:38:23 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:38:31 | bauzas | should we have a PTG room ? | |
| 16:38:39 | bauzas | which would be physical this time ? | |
| 16:38:46 | bauzas | :) | |
| 16:38:47 | gibi | can we have a window on the room? :) | |
| 16:38:57 | bauzas | I don't know the logistics yet | |
| 16:39:16 | bauzas | I can imagine the Foundation asking the teams to be agile and proposing some remote live connection | |
| 16:39:23 | sean-k-mooney | i would be happy with one in dark basment if it has white bords | |
| 16:40:00 | sean-k-mooney | yes if we have an ok netowrk | |
| 16:40:04 | bauzas | there is a remarks/feedback field in the survey | |
| 16:40:05 | sean-k-mooney | we can likely have a remote stream too | |
| 16:40:07 | bauzas | https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/oct2022_ptg_team_signup | |
| 16:40:13 | bauzas | I'll fill it up | |
| 16:40:22 | bauzas | but I could mention those two things | |
| 16:40:27 | gibi | to stream it we need mics and optional a camera | |
| 16:40:42 | sean-k-mooney | yep neutron have done that in the past | |
| 16:40:45 | bauzas | yeah and everytime we tried, this was a hard experience | |
| 16:41:10 | bauzas | I'll leave some notes | |
| 16:41:17 | bauzas | that's it for me, I need to leave | |
| 16:41:21 | gibi | bauzas: o/ | |
| 16:41:28 | gibi | so we have one more thing on the agenda | |
| 16:41:29 | sean-k-mooney | it works fine for neutron as far as i can tell but they more have the stream so people can listen and then respond via etherpath/irc | |
| 16:41:31 | bauzas | I have another item to discuss but let's punt it for next week | |
| 16:41:35 | gibi | (bauzas) Opportunities for low-hanging-fruits, anyone ? (only if we have time left) | |
| 16:41:39 | gibi | ahh OK | |
| 16:41:41 | gibi | then it is punted | |
| 16:41:44 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:41:52 | gibi | does anyone here has an extra topic for today? | |
| 16:41:58 | bauzas | gibi: feel free to wrap the meeting | |
| 16:42:02 | gibi | bauzas: will do | |
| 16:42:10 | bauzas | ++ | |