| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-05-17 | |||
| 15:32:47 | bauzas | and my kid was 3yo :) | |
| 15:33:01 | sean-k-mooney | i started with not having it voting ot not blocke patche merging until it was table | |
| 15:33:16 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: i wanted to have it voting eventuly too | |
| 15:33:36 | sean-k-mooney | and mensiton using fips testing as one of the reasons to do this as well as teting newer libvirt | |
| 15:33:44 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: so i think we are aligned | |
| 15:34:00 | sean-k-mooney | just was not expecting it to be voting until m2 honestly | |
| 15:34:19 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: yeah, I think we are saying same thing. if that become unstable we will make it non voting even that is what QA plan is. but as long as it is passing (we will fix the detach things) it is ok to try | |
| 15:34:49 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: untill we fix the detach thing i think its unstable which is why | |
| 15:35:03 | sean-k-mooney | lee had a patch to change it to voting at the end of the sshable series | |
| 15:35:32 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/834546 | |
| 15:35:38 | sean-k-mooney | i guess is what made the change | |
| 15:36:03 | gmann | yeah that is what I did, fixed most flaky test and see | |
| 15:36:04 | sean-k-mooney | it was proably meged too soone but that fine | |
| 15:36:15 | gmann | but sure, let me make all detach tests SSH-able whatever remaining | |
| 15:38:19 | gmann | gibi: left 1 comment, rest lgtm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/842140/1/tempest/api/compute/base.py#482 | |
| 15:38:48 | sean-k-mooney | hehe | |
| 15:38:55 | sean-k-mooney | we basically asked the same question | |
| 15:39:00 | sean-k-mooney | but i dont think we can hard code | |
| 15:39:03 | sean-k-mooney | to active | |
| 15:39:24 | sean-k-mooney | we can only set it to active if it was "sshaable" or "pingable" | |
| 15:39:32 | sean-k-mooney | if the instance was stopped when you resize it | |
| 15:39:40 | sean-k-mooney | it wont go to active after its resized | |
| 15:40:02 | gibi | it was hardcoded to ACTIVE before the change | |
| 15:40:13 | gibi | so I think we can hardcode it now too :) | |
| 15:40:16 | sean-k-mooney | i guess we dont resize stoped guests? | |
| 15:40:23 | gibi | I guess so | |
| 15:40:38 | sean-k-mooney | ok then they can update that when the add a test for that | |
| 15:40:47 | sean-k-mooney | so ok hardcode it | |
| 15:40:51 | gibi | cool | |
| 15:40:53 | gibi | I will respin | |
| 15:40:56 | gmann | if run validation is disabled then hard coded is ok | |
| 15:41:05 | gmann | and we know detach will be the issue that time | |
| 15:46:53 | gmann | these carry forwards comments from previous PS are becoming more iterating now. I am sure 3rd person reviewing this first time will be confused on it if they are fixed or not - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/842140/2/tempest/api/compute/base.py | |
| 15:47:08 | gmann | *irritating :) | |
| 15:47:21 | gmann | may be just for me | |
| 15:47:44 | sean-k-mooney | ya they are | |
| 15:47:59 | sean-k-mooney | i have started activly cleaning them up when i do reviews now | |
| 15:48:37 | sean-k-mooney | so i take a pass over a review comparing the old patch to new and and mark them as done if they are | |
| 15:48:47 | sean-k-mooney | then i do a reivew after the patch is "clean" | |
| 15:49:02 | sean-k-mooney | its a pain | |
| 15:52:28 | gmann | yeah | |
| 16:02:02 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:02:02 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue May 17 16:02:02 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:02:02 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:02:02 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:02:10 | bauzas | sorry, was late | |
| 16:02:11 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:02:14 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:02:16 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:25 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:02:33 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:03:12 | bauzas | and the heat wave here makes me melting | |
| 16:03:25 | bauzas | let's start then | |
| 16:03:31 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:36 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:03:40 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 14 new untriaged bugs (-5 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:03:49 | bauzas | kudos to Uggla for this excellent work | |
| 16:04:26 | bauzas | he wrote a triage etherpad (yet again, this wasn't mandatory to do it) but in case you wanna know what he triaged https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-20220510 | |
| 16:04:46 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 26 open stories (0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:04:53 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:05:20 | bauzas | which leads me to the last point | |
| 16:05:51 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: are you okay with holding the bug baton for this week ? | |
| 16:06:01 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 16:06:06 | bauzas | gracias | |
| 16:06:12 | bauzas | #info Next bug baton is passed to sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:06:38 | bauzas | any bugs to discuss before we move on ? | |
| 16:07:03 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:07:10 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:07:15 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:07:19 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs | |
| 16:07:25 | bauzas | all the above seems fine ^ | |
| 16:07:37 | bauzas | and not fine like in a fire | |
| 16:07:51 | artom | I think Uggla had a bug he wanted to double-check? Dunno if you want to leave that for the open discussion | |
| 16:07:59 | artom | triaged | |
| 16:07:59 | artom | 1959186 (appears to be valid TBC tomorrow) | |
| 16:08:01 | bauzas | artom: we can | |
| 16:08:52 | sean-k-mooney | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1959186 | |
| 16:08:59 | bauzas | I'll leave it for open discussion then | |
| 16:09:06 | bauzas | people can start digesting it meanwhile | |
| 16:09:25 | sean-k-mooney | initally this does not seam like a bug | |
| 16:09:28 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:09:29 | sean-k-mooney | but know behavior but ya | |
| 16:09:34 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:09:35 | sean-k-mooney | lets wait till later | |
| 16:09:46 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:52 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html | |
| 16:09:56 | bauzas | #info Zed-1 is due in 2 days | |
| 16:09:58 | bauzas | \o/ | |
| 16:10:09 | bauzas | before we discuss about this milestone | |
| 16:10:13 | bauzas | #info Spec review day happened last week on May 10th | |
| 16:10:18 | bauzas | #info 2 specs were approved but a lot of them were reviewed. Kudos to the team for this hard work. | |
| 16:10:26 | gibi | <3 | |
| 16:10:42 | bauzas | I've seen lot of feedback there | |
| 16:10:50 | bauzas | very happy | |
| 16:10:54 | bauzas | now, | |
| 16:10:57 | bauzas | zed-1 | |
| 16:11:20 | bauzas | in theory, we only have one thing to take care of for this milestone | |
| 16:11:31 | bauzas | libraries releases | |
| 16:12:29 | sean-k-mooney | yep the release patches have been proposed | |
| 16:12:36 | sean-k-mooney | i have not looked at them yet | |