| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-05-17 | |||
| 15:38:19 | gmann | gibi: left 1 comment, rest lgtm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/842140/1/tempest/api/compute/base.py#482 | |
| 15:38:48 | sean-k-mooney | hehe | |
| 15:38:55 | sean-k-mooney | we basically asked the same question | |
| 15:39:00 | sean-k-mooney | but i dont think we can hard code | |
| 15:39:03 | sean-k-mooney | to active | |
| 15:39:24 | sean-k-mooney | we can only set it to active if it was "sshaable" or "pingable" | |
| 15:39:32 | sean-k-mooney | if the instance was stopped when you resize it | |
| 15:39:40 | sean-k-mooney | it wont go to active after its resized | |
| 15:40:02 | gibi | it was hardcoded to ACTIVE before the change | |
| 15:40:13 | gibi | so I think we can hardcode it now too :) | |
| 15:40:16 | sean-k-mooney | i guess we dont resize stoped guests? | |
| 15:40:23 | gibi | I guess so | |
| 15:40:38 | sean-k-mooney | ok then they can update that when the add a test for that | |
| 15:40:47 | sean-k-mooney | so ok hardcode it | |
| 15:40:51 | gibi | cool | |
| 15:40:53 | gibi | I will respin | |
| 15:40:56 | gmann | if run validation is disabled then hard coded is ok | |
| 15:41:05 | gmann | and we know detach will be the issue that time | |
| 15:46:53 | gmann | these carry forwards comments from previous PS are becoming more iterating now. I am sure 3rd person reviewing this first time will be confused on it if they are fixed or not - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/842140/2/tempest/api/compute/base.py | |
| 15:47:08 | gmann | *irritating :) | |
| 15:47:21 | gmann | may be just for me | |
| 15:47:44 | sean-k-mooney | ya they are | |
| 15:47:59 | sean-k-mooney | i have started activly cleaning them up when i do reviews now | |
| 15:48:37 | sean-k-mooney | so i take a pass over a review comparing the old patch to new and and mark them as done if they are | |
| 15:48:47 | sean-k-mooney | then i do a reivew after the patch is "clean" | |
| 15:49:02 | sean-k-mooney | its a pain | |
| 15:52:28 | gmann | yeah | |
| 16:02:02 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:02:02 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue May 17 16:02:02 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:02:02 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:02:02 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:02:10 | bauzas | sorry, was late | |
| 16:02:11 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:02:14 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:02:16 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:25 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:02:33 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:03:12 | bauzas | and the heat wave here makes me melting | |
| 16:03:25 | bauzas | let's start then | |
| 16:03:31 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:36 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:03:40 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 14 new untriaged bugs (-5 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:03:49 | bauzas | kudos to Uggla for this excellent work | |
| 16:04:26 | bauzas | he wrote a triage etherpad (yet again, this wasn't mandatory to do it) but in case you wanna know what he triaged https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-20220510 | |
| 16:04:46 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 26 open stories (0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:04:53 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:05:20 | bauzas | which leads me to the last point | |
| 16:05:51 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: are you okay with holding the bug baton for this week ? | |
| 16:06:01 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 16:06:06 | bauzas | gracias | |
| 16:06:12 | bauzas | #info Next bug baton is passed to sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:06:38 | bauzas | any bugs to discuss before we move on ? | |
| 16:07:03 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:07:10 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:07:15 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:07:19 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs | |
| 16:07:25 | bauzas | all the above seems fine ^ | |
| 16:07:37 | bauzas | and not fine like in a fire | |
| 16:07:51 | artom | I think Uggla had a bug he wanted to double-check? Dunno if you want to leave that for the open discussion | |
| 16:07:59 | artom | triaged | |
| 16:07:59 | artom | 1959186 (appears to be valid TBC tomorrow) | |
| 16:08:01 | bauzas | artom: we can | |
| 16:08:52 | sean-k-mooney | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1959186 | |
| 16:08:59 | bauzas | I'll leave it for open discussion then | |
| 16:09:06 | bauzas | people can start digesting it meanwhile | |
| 16:09:25 | sean-k-mooney | initally this does not seam like a bug | |
| 16:09:28 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:09:29 | sean-k-mooney | but know behavior but ya | |
| 16:09:34 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:09:35 | sean-k-mooney | lets wait till later | |
| 16:09:46 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:52 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html | |
| 16:09:56 | bauzas | #info Zed-1 is due in 2 days | |
| 16:09:58 | bauzas | \o/ | |
| 16:10:09 | bauzas | before we discuss about this milestone | |
| 16:10:13 | bauzas | #info Spec review day happened last week on May 10th | |
| 16:10:18 | bauzas | #info 2 specs were approved but a lot of them were reviewed. Kudos to the team for this hard work. | |
| 16:10:26 | gibi | <3 | |
| 16:10:42 | bauzas | I've seen lot of feedback there | |
| 16:10:50 | bauzas | very happy | |
| 16:10:54 | bauzas | now, | |
| 16:10:57 | bauzas | zed-1 | |
| 16:11:20 | bauzas | in theory, we only have one thing to take care of for this milestone | |
| 16:11:31 | bauzas | libraries releases | |
| 16:12:29 | sean-k-mooney | yep the release patches have been proposed | |
| 16:12:36 | sean-k-mooney | i have not looked at them yet | |
| 16:13:07 | sean-k-mooney | are theree any patches peopel would like to wait for? | |
| 16:13:18 | bauzas | that's my humble question | |
| 16:13:32 | sean-k-mooney | there is one patch in flight in os-vif but i dotn think we have to wait for that | |
| 16:13:32 | bauzas | do people care of something they'd like to see published before end of this cycle for the libs ? | |
| 16:13:44 | gibi | no need to wait, we can push out a new lib release any time it is freeee | |
| 16:13:45 | bauzas | os-traits seems interesting to look at | |
| 16:14:08 | sean-k-mooney | yep we use cycle with intermdiaries | |
| 16:14:16 | sean-k-mooney | which requries at least 1 release per cycle | |
| 16:14:22 | sean-k-mooney | but we can have as many as we want | |
| 16:14:29 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:os-traits+is:open is empty :) | |
| 16:14:48 | bauzas | oh shit | |
| 16:14:48 | sean-k-mooney | yep i think we close to approving spec that would add some | |
| 16:14:52 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/os-traits+is:open | |
| 16:14:56 | bauzas | better now:) | |