Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-23
10:35:44 kashyap gibi: (Sorry, was out for a run; weather is nice for a change) Hm, I'm feeling like we're 2 steps fwd, 1 step backward
10:44:16 gibi bauzas: Alban responded in review to update the versions so I'm still OK
10:44:29 gibi kashyap: I still in the
10:44:40 gibi kashyap: I'm still in the winter mode an only use the pool
10:44:48 gibi *and
10:45:55 kashyap I can't swim yet, I can do "controlled not drowning" in a calm pool if you know what I mean :D
10:46:07 gibi :)
10:46:24 gibi kashyap: about the bug, I'm not sure how to move forward
10:46:28 kashyap (No worries. I only began after 2 months...but keep walking 8-ish KM each day. But it's no substitue for running)
10:46:43 kashyap gibi: Back to the bug, it looks like it is not reproducible, right?
10:47:49 kashyap gibi: Did you look for this?
10:47:51 kashyap "libvirt.libvirtError: Unable to read from monitor: Connection reset by peer"
10:48:27 gibi I looked for the more specific raise libvirtError..virDomainGetBlockJobInfo.. failed.. regex
10:48:53 gibi but I can check the more generic one
10:50:31 kashyap gibi: Your search makes sense.
10:50:50 kashyap Yeah, what I'm wondering is, we don't see the _crash_ anymore:
10:50:51 kashyap "2022-01-25 13:13:35.058+0000: shutting down, reason=crashed"
10:51:14 kashyap Is that what you found based on your searches? That you can't find the crash anymore?
10:52:43 gibi I did not find the same nova symptom, the libvirtError, in any upstream logs, so I did not look deeper
10:53:27 gibi I can also try to find the same tempest test failure
10:53:32 gibi in upstream jobs
10:53:58 gibi and if I found one then I can refine from there
10:54:15 kashyap gibi: Nod. But you wanted a TripleO job result, right?
10:54:59 kashyap gibi: When you get a minute, can you please add your observation so far? Just so that it gives an insight that several folks are looking at it - https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1959014/
10:55:37 gibi I can look at the original triploo run from ^^ bug but I'm new to tripleo that why I tried to find a repro in a nova run
10:56:28 kashyap Yeah, understood. I'm "perpetually new" to TripleO too. They're seeing this on TripleO, it looks like
10:56:43 kashyap gibi: Good that we (you) ruled it out w/ plain upstream jobs, at least. Thank you for the digging
10:57:15 gibi I will look at the original run, and then update the bug what I see
10:59:37 sean-k-mooney bauzas: i think https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-fcd is the blueprint for that by the way
10:59:53 sean-k-mooney its approved for the yoga cycle
11:00:09 stephenfin Is it just me, or is anyone else not getting emails from Gerrit at the moment. I haven't seen anything since midday yesterday
11:00:09 sean-k-mooney althouhg they are missing the commit message line for it
11:00:35 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: it know that you have abandoned us :P
11:01:06 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: last email was 12:04 yesterday
11:01:17 sean-k-mooney not sure if i should have got anything since then
11:01:48 bauzas sean-k-mooney: yup, we approved it as a specless BP during a meeting, see the whiteboard
11:02:20 sean-k-mooney bauzas: oh i know just wanted to highlight it to you incase you tought it was not approved
11:02:38 sean-k-mooney i noticed both you and gibi are +2 on it
11:02:47 bauzas sean-k-mooney: no, I'm tracking all the approved bps in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status
11:02:55 sean-k-mooney but ye have not +w so i was wondering if you were conceren that it was not approved
11:03:05 bauzas sean-k-mooney: and this one was in there so I was looking at it
11:03:06 sean-k-mooney ack
11:03:17 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I eventually +W it 1 min ago
11:03:21 bauzas as alban replied
11:03:37 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: so https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/826719 meged 14 hours ago
11:03:46 sean-k-mooney and i dont have a gerrit email from it
11:04:07 sean-k-mooney so ya i havent got anythin since just after noon yesterday so looks like its not just you
11:29:45 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: I emailed the list and mentioned it on #opendev
11:31:14 sean-k-mooney gibi by the way your placment any triats series is now merged in case you didnt get the gerrit email :)
11:31:47 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: was there anything in particalar you were looking for
11:31:57 sean-k-mooney or just noticed you got no emails form gerrit in a while
11:32:09 stephenfin No, just noticed the lack of emails
11:32:15 sean-k-mooney ack
11:32:17 stephenfin (Usually it's a firehose)
11:35:07 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: sorry to bother you but do you know what i should do with https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/placement-distgit/+/39716 the build failed because it coudl not resovle the centos8-stream repos its not related to the patch that merged so do i just abandon that?
11:35:45 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: The RDO folks normally close these out once the outage is over
11:36:13 sean-k-mooney ok it showed up in my email so i was like do i need to do somehting with this
11:36:35 sean-k-mooney Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'Stream-BaseOS':
11:36:49 sean-k-mooney is clearly not related to placement
11:37:59 lyarwood Yeah it's infra 99% of the time
11:38:13 sean-k-mooney 2919c3f393bb2e897cead2e62c598acadeae3b8bd1603ef8e171e4274ff1b2e0-primary.xml.gz is missing form the mirrors
11:38:39 sean-k-mooney so proably a sync issue
11:38:56 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: how is life in openshift land
11:39:33 lyarwood Yeah good, I've somehow ended up helping with the introduction of flavors into KubeVirt ^_^
11:40:12 opendevreview Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for volume backed server rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/820368
11:40:42 sean-k-mooney ok so pod spec templates or something like that ya
11:43:21 sean-k-mooney the idea of flavors in a k8s env would be somewhat differnt then ours i expect since the intent with k8s is to be much more dynmic in terms of each pod spec is used for that one set of pods but not reused across unrelated pods
11:44:03 sean-k-mooney so unlike openstack if you udated the kubevirt flavor i would expect that to propagate to everything that used it
11:59:52 gibi kashyap: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1959014/comments/15 tldr; I don't think the original problem was reproduced in later runs linked in the bug
12:00:34 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: by the way nova is nolonger installable with -e because pbr cannot figure out the version
12:00:49 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks for pushing the any-traits through. I will get back to the series to do the small nit followup and the perf measurements / tuning
12:01:16 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: i know there is a bug with the current pbr due to metadata or somehting like that but do you know if the impact on nova is expected
12:01:30 sean-k-mooney gibi: ack
12:02:34 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: There is? I wasn't aware of anything
12:02:48 sean-k-mooney if you install with devstack
12:02:58 sean-k-mooney then clone nova and pip install -e the clone
12:03:08 sean-k-mooney then when you restart the nova compute agent
12:03:10 sean-k-mooney or any of the rest
12:03:13 sean-k-mooney it will fail to run
12:03:32 sean-k-mooney because pbr will not be able to figure out the version
12:03:47 sean-k-mooney so you ahve to do a non -e install currently
12:04:02 sean-k-mooney which is annoying since you have to redo it every time you make a change
12:06:59 gibi hm, I haven't hit that issue yet ^^
12:07:10 gibi probably my pbr is older
12:09:29 sean-k-mooney https://paste.opendev.org/show/812529/
12:09:56 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: gibi that is what it looks liek in the journal
12:10:40 stephenfin That's weird. I haven't seen that eithe
12:10:41 stephenfin *either
12:10:53 sean-k-mooney have you done sudo pip install -e
12:11:05 sean-k-mooney of the repo or a differnt copy of the repo
12:11:14 stephenfin I didn't need to. It does an editable install by default
12:11:19 stephenfin DevStack that is
12:11:27 gibi yeah I have the editable nova in devstack too
12:11:36 gibi so then that is the difference
12:11:55 sean-k-mooney so ye dont use a second repo for dev
12:12:06 sean-k-mooney with devstafck using reclone=ture i guess
12:12:21 gibi I tend to pull from my dev repo to the devstack nova repo with git
12:12:38 stephenfin Yeah, me too
12:12:47 sean-k-mooney ok you do it that way instead of installign the dev one after the fact
12:12:49 stephenfin Or I push from the local to devstack

Earlier   Later