Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-22
16:03:35 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:03:39 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 27 new untriaged bugs (-15 since the last meeting)
16:03:48 bauzas thanks gibi and others for having looked at the bugs
16:03:52 bauzas #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage
16:03:57 bauzas link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement
16:04:01 bauzas #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement
16:04:06 bauzas voila
16:04:10 bauzas any bugs to discuss ?
16:04:48 bauzas looks not
16:04:57 bauzas again, thanks for the folks who looked at the bugs
16:05:10 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:05:14 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:05:17 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status
16:05:21 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:05:37 bauzas so we had a few new gate failures
16:05:55 bauzas I saw gibi looking at one
16:06:10 bauzas any of them needing to be discussed ?
16:06:22 gibi I just did some bug triage and duplicated thing together
16:06:30 gibi I did not see a new failure this week
16:06:37 gibi * new type of failure
16:07:15 bauzas kk
16:07:32 bauzas ok, then moving to the next topic
16:07:39 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:07:43 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-ff FeatureFreeze in 2 days
16:07:47 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status Etherpad for blueprints tracking
16:07:59 bauzas so the FeatureFreeze will be on Thursday EOB
16:08:35 bauzas tbh, that means that nova-cores won't merge any feature change on Friday
16:08:48 bauzas unless we got a gate issue
16:09:08 bauzas do people have any concerns ?
16:09:17 gibi bauzas: you mean no +A on Friday
16:09:25 bauzas gibi: sorry yes
16:09:25 gibi except if rebase is needed
16:09:29 bauzas correct
16:09:32 gibi ack
16:09:34 gibi works for me
16:10:15 gmann ack
16:10:26 bauzas do people want to discuss about any blueprint here ?
16:10:38 gmann need more reviews on RBAC series https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fpolicy-defaults-refresh-2
16:10:40 liorf95 yes please
16:10:44 gmann thanks gibi for reviews
16:10:44 bauzas yes, I'll do
16:10:48 gmann thanks
16:10:51 liorf95 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nvmeof-multipath
16:10:57 bauzas liorf95: we'll discuss about your bp in the open discussion topic
16:10:58 sean-k-mooney liorf95: i think yours is in opendicuss at the end but we coudl bring it up now too
16:11:19 liorf95 as you want
16:11:35 bauzas liorf95: that's in the agenda :)
16:11:39 bauzas anyway
16:11:49 bauzas secure RBAC, yes I'll review
16:12:04 bauzas we merged a few features before
16:12:19 bauzas I'll modify Launchpad on Friday
16:12:35 chateaulav just reviews for emulation to ensure nothing bltent sticks out
16:13:09 bauzas ok
16:14:03 bauzas ok, moving on then
16:14:14 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:14:17 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:14:25 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1
16:14:36 bauzas most of the priorities were merged
16:15:05 bauzas nothing to tell here
16:15:10 bauzas let's continue to review
16:15:17 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:15:21 bauzas elodilles: your time
16:15:41 elodilles info stable/queens gate fix proposed: https://review.opendev.org/830327 (needs to backport to pike as well)
16:15:44 elodilles #info stable/xena gate should be better as Artom's workaround was merged (test_tagged_attachment)
16:15:47 elodilles #info stable/wallaby still needs the libvirt_disable_apic to merge + it seems the test_tagged_attachment issue is also present
16:15:50 elodilles oops
16:15:52 elodilles sorry
16:16:09 elodilles anyway, this is mostly it ^^^
16:16:50 elodilles we might need the workarounds to stable/victoria too
16:17:31 elodilles #info stable/queens gate fix proposed: https://review.opendev.org/830327 (needs to backport to pike as well)
16:17:40 elodilles (just to have it in the logs)
16:18:02 bauzas :)
16:19:44 bauzas thanks elodilles
16:19:50 elodilles np
16:19:58 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:20:08 bauzas liorf95: (lior Friedman) https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nvmeof-multipath
16:20:14 bauzas liorf95: your turn
16:20:21 liorf95 yes please
16:20:23 bauzas or I can explain
16:20:32 bauzas maybe some of them don't understand the contect
16:20:36 bauzas context
16:20:36 bauzas so,
16:20:47 liorf95 we need this bp to be approved for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/823941
16:21:34 bauzas basically we had https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/823941 that was reviewed
16:21:48 bauzas and stephenfin and sean-k-mooney accepted the change
16:21:49 bauzas but,
16:22:09 bauzas as you can look at the comments, we saw it was actually a feature
16:22:51 bauzas that's why I accepted to have a discussion in this meeting to see whether folks accept to merge this one even if we had not accepted the blueprint before
16:23:08 bauzas for the moment, there is a procedural -2 from me
16:23:38 bauzas but if folks agree here to have an exception for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nvmeof-multipath as a specless bp, then I could remove it
16:24:07 bauzas now, the question : is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nvmeof-multipath a specless BP and are folks accepting it as a exception ?
16:24:54 gibi I've nothing against it. It is just a volume driver so no spec needed. And the change is really small
16:25:12 bauzas correct
16:26:02 bauzas change is small and only touching a very few places
16:26:27 sean-k-mooney i am supprotive fo doign it as a specless blueprint
16:26:42 bauzas ok, anyone having concern ?
16:26:45 sean-k-mooney its after teh cutoff but the scale of it is small enought that i think an excption can be made
16:26:55 bauzas yeah
16:27:08 opendevreview Merged openstack/placement master: Extend the RP db query to support any-traits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/825848
16:27:10 opendevreview Merged openstack/placement master: DB layer should only depend on trait id not names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/826490

Earlier   Later