Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-02-22
15:44:44 gibi then maybe artom looked at a different run her https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1959014/comments/2
15:45:09 kashyap Yeah, likely. This is a different run where the (QEMU) 'blockdev-del' failure is occuring
15:50:22 sean-k-mooney well standard snapshot in this context means a local snapshot of a file done by qemu
15:50:37 kashyap I've asked Peter Krempa from libvirt about the log traces; we'll see if we get something
15:50:42 sean-k-mooney vs direct which means we are delegating the snapshot to the ceph cluster
15:51:13 kashyap sean-k-mooney: Yeah, but "standard" and "direct" are too abstract terms. We should be explicit on what it means.
15:51:30 kashyap (But that's a patch for a different day.)
15:52:21 sean-k-mooney well perhaps but thse are really intended for us as nova develpers to read
15:52:59 kashyap Yeah, even for developers who work on different subsystems it will be far from obvious.
15:53:04 sean-k-mooney so there si some expecation of knowing what the code does
15:53:24 gibi kashyap: looking at the req-5a68f755-b20c-41a7-a005-3bcc8b800b28 you quoted above, I don't see anything in the logs about the failure, nova logged that the snapshot is done and the image is uploaded https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/build/67d64d4a4d584eb8be9db0fbc6e18c9d/log/logs/overcloud-novacompute-0/var/log/containers/nova/nova-compute.log.1.gz#5705
15:54:16 kashyap gibi: Hmmm, odd; so the guy says the above "reproduces" the problem, not sure what is going on here
15:54:56 kashyap But in the libvirtd debug log, I _do_ see
15:54:59 kashyap :
15:54:59 kashyap 2022-02-08 17:32:24.369+0000: 31580: error : qemuMonitorJSONCheckErrorFull:406 : internal error: unable to execute QEMU command 'blockdev-del': Failed to find node with node-name='libvirt-4-
15:55:03 kashyap storage'
15:55:36 gibi hm based on the timestamp that is 7 mintutes later
15:55:55 kashyap ("blockdev-del" deletes a block device that's added by "blockdev-add")
15:56:44 kashyap gibi: Hmm, I see. Then I'm scratching my head here about what's going on from a failure trigger
15:57:24 sean-k-mooney that is likely part of the test cleanup
15:58:18 kashyap sean-k-mooney: No, from the traceback in the bug description, it is happening at resource_setup() here:
15:58:18 sean-k-mooney if its 7 minute after the snapshot
15:58:21 kashyap https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/api/compute/images/test_list_image_filters.py#L110
15:58:24 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Run clean up calls when queued live migration is aborted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828570
15:59:40 sean-k-mooney hum why woudl dat do a blockdev-del
15:59:48 sean-k-mooney unless the vm coudl not boot
15:59:53 sean-k-mooney and it was cleaning up
16:00:58 kashyap Yeah, it sounds like a clean-up act somewhere
16:01:52 gibi bauzas: ping :)
16:01:53 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: [stable-only] Fix sphinx doc job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/830327
16:02:09 bauzas oh shit
16:02:14 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:02:14 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Feb 22 16:02:13 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:02:14 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:02:14 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:02:24 bauzas hey folks, sorry the delay
16:02:31 gmann o/
16:02:35 chateaulav \o
16:02:42 bauzas that's its fault
16:03:00 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:03:10 elodilles o/
16:03:20 bauzas let's a quick meeting since we're close to some deadline :)
16:03:24 bauzas let's do*
16:03:30 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:03:35 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:03:39 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 27 new untriaged bugs (-15 since the last meeting)
16:03:48 bauzas thanks gibi and others for having looked at the bugs
16:03:52 bauzas #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage
16:03:57 bauzas link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement
16:04:01 bauzas #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement
16:04:06 bauzas voila
16:04:10 bauzas any bugs to discuss ?
16:04:48 bauzas looks not
16:04:57 bauzas again, thanks for the folks who looked at the bugs
16:05:10 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:05:14 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:05:17 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status
16:05:21 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:05:37 bauzas so we had a few new gate failures
16:05:55 bauzas I saw gibi looking at one
16:06:10 bauzas any of them needing to be discussed ?
16:06:22 gibi I just did some bug triage and duplicated thing together
16:06:30 gibi I did not see a new failure this week
16:06:37 gibi * new type of failure
16:07:15 bauzas kk
16:07:32 bauzas ok, then moving to the next topic
16:07:39 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:07:43 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-ff FeatureFreeze in 2 days
16:07:47 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status Etherpad for blueprints tracking
16:07:59 bauzas so the FeatureFreeze will be on Thursday EOB
16:08:35 bauzas tbh, that means that nova-cores won't merge any feature change on Friday
16:08:48 bauzas unless we got a gate issue
16:09:08 bauzas do people have any concerns ?
16:09:17 gibi bauzas: you mean no +A on Friday
16:09:25 bauzas gibi: sorry yes
16:09:25 gibi except if rebase is needed
16:09:29 bauzas correct
16:09:32 gibi ack
16:09:34 gibi works for me
16:10:15 gmann ack
16:10:26 bauzas do people want to discuss about any blueprint here ?
16:10:38 gmann need more reviews on RBAC series https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fpolicy-defaults-refresh-2
16:10:40 liorf95 yes please
16:10:44 gmann thanks gibi for reviews
16:10:44 bauzas yes, I'll do
16:10:48 gmann thanks
16:10:51 liorf95 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nvmeof-multipath
16:10:57 bauzas liorf95: we'll discuss about your bp in the open discussion topic
16:10:58 sean-k-mooney liorf95: i think yours is in opendicuss at the end but we coudl bring it up now too
16:11:19 liorf95 as you want
16:11:35 bauzas liorf95: that's in the agenda :)
16:11:39 bauzas anyway
16:11:49 bauzas secure RBAC, yes I'll review
16:12:04 bauzas we merged a few features before
16:12:19 bauzas I'll modify Launchpad on Friday
16:12:35 chateaulav just reviews for emulation to ensure nothing bltent sticks out
16:13:09 bauzas ok
16:14:03 bauzas ok, moving on then
16:14:14 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:14:17 bauzas #topic Review priorities

Earlier   Later