Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-09-28
14:56:07 gmann zigo: ok, let me debug that today/tomorrow, having only deprecated rules in policy file should work
14:56:11 zigo gmann: I do not *NEED* to generate one, but I think it is a service to the Debian users to provide them with a policy file that has all what's possible...
14:57:04 zigo gmann: Well, maybe we should add an option in oslopolicy-sample-generator to comment out the DEPRECATED options ?
14:57:35 zigo oslopolicy-sample-generator --commented-out-deprecated-options --output-file=$(CURDIR)/debian/nova-common/etc/nova/policy.d/00_default_policy.yaml --format yaml --namespace nova
14:57:53 gmann zigo: oh does oslopolicy-sample-generator tool generated that file with depreacted rule not commented?
14:58:08 zigo gmann: Yeah, that's what I'm saying since the begining ! :)
14:58:16 zigo Sorry for not expressing myself correctly ...
14:58:19 gmann humm
14:58:28 zigo My package simply does:
14:58:28 zigo mkdir -p $(CURDIR)/debian/nova-common/etc/nova/policy.d
14:58:28 zigo PYTHONPATH=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages oslopolicy-sample-generator \
14:58:29 zigo --output-file=$(CURDIR)/debian/nova-common/etc/nova/policy.d/00_default_policy.yaml \
14:58:31 zigo --format yaml \
14:58:33 zigo --namespace nova
14:58:38 zigo Nothing more ...
14:59:05 zigo (note: the PYTHONPATH setting is there to use the installed python3-nova package as if it was in the system)
15:13:45 bauzas lyarwood: seen this ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1945323
15:13:56 bauzas gibi: the reporter proposes ^ for a RC3
15:14:07 bauzas wondering whether it's a regression
15:14:48 bauzas but this sounds valid as it's due to a recent osbrick release
15:15:35 gibi bauzas: lyarwood: left a -1 on the fix, but I think his comments confirms that this needs to fixed
15:16:08 bauzas ok, so let's do a RC2 for the moment and prepare a RC3 release if so
15:17:06 gibi bauzas: based on the gate status we will go with RC2 :D
15:18:27 bauzas gibi: hmmm, because of the pipeline ?
15:18:45 bauzas gibi: I can only see a 2-hour delay which looks a bit busy but still ok-ish
15:19:15 gibi bauzas: becuase i) of apache placement break needs to be fixed from victoria to master direction then ii) nova-granade-multinode still need to be fixed with trunk port
15:19:33 gibi just to enable landing things on master :)
15:19:39 bauzas hah
15:20:03 gibi an we have 2 days left
15:22:29 bauzas gibi: could we say to not use the latest osbrick release for Xena then ?
15:23:02 gibi that also a patch to the requirements.txt to pin osbrick
15:23:14 gibi which we need to land
15:23:29 gibi we can say in the bug report this as a suggestion
15:23:30 bauzas surely
15:23:35 gibi and packagers can apply it
15:23:43 bauzas I wasn't thinking of our reqs
15:23:50 bauzas but rather documenting it for packagers
15:23:57 bauzas in reno
15:24:11 gibi yeah reno could work as that does not require full CI run
15:24:17 bauzas we have a "bugs" reno section AFAICR
15:24:34 gibi yepp you are right, this is a good idea
15:24:42 gibi to doc as known bug
15:24:52 bauzas let's discuss then it during the meeting
15:25:07 bauzas I'll be off for the next 30 mins, I have some appointment coming at home
15:25:16 bauzas but I'll be there for the start
15:25:30 bauzas gibi: ^ (fyk)
15:25:47 gibi bauzas: ack
15:26:34 zigo Had to do this: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/nova/-/commit/7c55fbf4356399f96906162accb3fa80d70f9d24
15:26:35 zigo :/
15:26:48 zigo Should that be reported to oslo.policy?
15:27:00 bauzas gibi: grabbing the bug reports for the gate hold
15:27:11 bauzas gibi: do you have them already somewhere ?
15:27:25 bauzas I wanna write them for the meeting agenda
15:27:44 gibi bauzas: we don't have bugreport for devstack about the apache placement break
15:27:46 bauzas I've seen the apache issue in the ML, but I haven't seen a proper bug report yet
15:27:53 bauzas dang
15:28:10 gibi bauzas: also we don't have bugreport for the nova-granade-multinode issue either :/
15:28:18 gibi (we are lazy asses)
15:28:37 bauzas merveilleux
15:29:33 gibi but at leat we are discussing that in #openstack-neutron now in their CI meeting as we suspect they broke that for us
15:32:55 gmann zigo: yes please, file a bug there and I will debug that
15:41:06 lyarwood bauzas: I wouldn't hold rc for that fix FWIW
15:41:32 zigo gmann: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.policy/+bug/1945336
15:51:45 gibi lyarwood: fyi, during the neutron ci meeting we talked about the nova-grenade-multinode issue and slaweq point at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/793141 that might be related
15:52:23 lyarwood kk thanks
15:52:28 gibi it is in xena, and grenade just started using devstack
15:52:37 gibi s/devstac/xena devstack/
15:56:29 ralonsoh gibi, so far, I've seen three new extensions (between jobs executed 4 days ago and today)
15:56:31 ralonsoh qos-pps
15:56:31 ralonsoh dns-integration-domain-keywords
15:56:31 ralonsoh ecmp_routes
15:58:01 bauzas nova meeting in 3 mins
15:58:06 bauzas *here*
16:00:10 gibi ralonsoh: ack
16:00:32 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:32 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Sep 28 16:00:32 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:32 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:32 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:41 bauzas hola !
16:01:17 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:01:40 bauzas thanks for being here
16:01:44 bauzas who's around ?
16:01:57 elodilles o/
16:02:24 gibi \o
16:02:44 bauzas let's start
16:02:52 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:03:03 bauzas No Critical bug
16:03:16 bauzas #link 13 new untriaged bugs (+0 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New
16:03:25 bauzas thanks for people who triaged them :)
16:03:41 bauzas one open bug marked with xena-rc-potential tag #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=xena-rc-potential
16:03:42 gibi bauzas: was it you ?:)
16:03:51 bauzas gibi: shhhhhhhhtttt :p
16:04:16 bauzas so, https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1945323 is proposed against RC*
16:04:18 gibi :x
16:04:40 bauzas tl;dr: last osbrick release is creating problems for NVMe volumes
16:05:01 bauzas the fix is provided https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811413 but not yet merged
16:05:44 bauzas we'll discuss about RC releases in the next topic, but here the question is, should we try to merge ^ before Thursday as it's the deadline for RC
16:05:49 bauzas ?
16:06:01 bauzas lyarwood had concerns and I have an opinion
16:06:14 gibi I think if the fix is valid then we should aim to land it

Earlier   Later