Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-09-28
15:19:15 gibi bauzas: becuase i) of apache placement break needs to be fixed from victoria to master direction then ii) nova-granade-multinode still need to be fixed with trunk port
15:19:33 gibi just to enable landing things on master :)
15:19:39 bauzas hah
15:20:03 gibi an we have 2 days left
15:22:29 bauzas gibi: could we say to not use the latest osbrick release for Xena then ?
15:23:02 gibi that also a patch to the requirements.txt to pin osbrick
15:23:14 gibi which we need to land
15:23:29 gibi we can say in the bug report this as a suggestion
15:23:30 bauzas surely
15:23:35 gibi and packagers can apply it
15:23:43 bauzas I wasn't thinking of our reqs
15:23:50 bauzas but rather documenting it for packagers
15:23:57 bauzas in reno
15:24:11 gibi yeah reno could work as that does not require full CI run
15:24:17 bauzas we have a "bugs" reno section AFAICR
15:24:34 gibi yepp you are right, this is a good idea
15:24:42 gibi to doc as known bug
15:24:52 bauzas let's discuss then it during the meeting
15:25:07 bauzas I'll be off for the next 30 mins, I have some appointment coming at home
15:25:16 bauzas but I'll be there for the start
15:25:30 bauzas gibi: ^ (fyk)
15:25:47 gibi bauzas: ack
15:26:34 zigo Had to do this: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/nova/-/commit/7c55fbf4356399f96906162accb3fa80d70f9d24
15:26:35 zigo :/
15:26:48 zigo Should that be reported to oslo.policy?
15:27:00 bauzas gibi: grabbing the bug reports for the gate hold
15:27:11 bauzas gibi: do you have them already somewhere ?
15:27:25 bauzas I wanna write them for the meeting agenda
15:27:44 gibi bauzas: we don't have bugreport for devstack about the apache placement break
15:27:46 bauzas I've seen the apache issue in the ML, but I haven't seen a proper bug report yet
15:27:53 bauzas dang
15:28:10 gibi bauzas: also we don't have bugreport for the nova-granade-multinode issue either :/
15:28:18 gibi (we are lazy asses)
15:28:37 bauzas merveilleux
15:29:33 gibi but at leat we are discussing that in #openstack-neutron now in their CI meeting as we suspect they broke that for us
15:32:55 gmann zigo: yes please, file a bug there and I will debug that
15:41:06 lyarwood bauzas: I wouldn't hold rc for that fix FWIW
15:41:32 zigo gmann: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.policy/+bug/1945336
15:51:45 gibi lyarwood: fyi, during the neutron ci meeting we talked about the nova-grenade-multinode issue and slaweq point at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/793141 that might be related
15:52:23 lyarwood kk thanks
15:52:28 gibi it is in xena, and grenade just started using devstack
15:52:37 gibi s/devstac/xena devstack/
15:56:29 ralonsoh gibi, so far, I've seen three new extensions (between jobs executed 4 days ago and today)
15:56:31 ralonsoh qos-pps
15:56:31 ralonsoh dns-integration-domain-keywords
15:56:31 ralonsoh ecmp_routes
15:58:01 bauzas nova meeting in 3 mins
15:58:06 bauzas *here*
16:00:10 gibi ralonsoh: ack
16:00:32 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:32 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Sep 28 16:00:32 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:32 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:32 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:41 bauzas hola !
16:01:17 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:01:40 bauzas thanks for being here
16:01:44 bauzas who's around ?
16:01:57 elodilles o/
16:02:24 gibi \o
16:02:44 bauzas let's start
16:02:52 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:03:03 bauzas No Critical bug
16:03:16 bauzas #link 13 new untriaged bugs (+0 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New
16:03:25 bauzas thanks for people who triaged them :)
16:03:41 bauzas one open bug marked with xena-rc-potential tag #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=xena-rc-potential
16:03:42 gibi bauzas: was it you ?:)
16:03:51 bauzas gibi: shhhhhhhhtttt :p
16:04:16 bauzas so, https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1945323 is proposed against RC*
16:04:18 gibi :x
16:04:40 bauzas tl;dr: last osbrick release is creating problems for NVMe volumes
16:05:01 bauzas the fix is provided https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811413 but not yet merged
16:05:44 bauzas we'll discuss about RC releases in the next topic, but here the question is, should we try to merge ^ before Thursday as it's the deadline for RC
16:05:49 bauzas ?
16:06:01 bauzas lyarwood had concerns and I have an opinion
16:06:14 gibi I think if the fix is valid then we should aim to land it
16:06:21 gibi but the gate state might not allow that
16:06:37 bauzas given the gate is bad at the moment (again, we will discuss this later), we could try to land it but at least we should provide a releasenotes documentation
16:06:52 bauzas telling about the bug
16:07:25 bauzas so, in case we can't land the fix, operators would still see the documentation and for example packagers wouldn't use the latest osbrick if they want to support NVMe
16:07:30 bauzas thoughts ?
16:07:46 bauzas remember that we have a "bugs" section in nova relnotes
16:07:55 bauzas (this gives a "known bugs" section)
16:08:09 gibi I agree to land a reno, regardless of the fix
16:08:39 bauzas given I proposed, I need to write it
16:08:48 bauzas but someone could write it if they want :)
16:09:01 bauzas e0ne: around ?
16:09:20 bauzas we're discussing about your open bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1945323
16:09:27 e0ne bauzas: hi
16:09:36 bauzas and we're proposing you to write a reno change documenting the known bug
16:10:12 bauzas so in case we can't merge the fix before thursday's deadline for RCs, operators would have a documentation explaining how to workaround
16:10:24 e0ne ok
16:10:29 e0ne fair enough
16:10:32 bauzas e0ne: can you write it ?
16:10:43 e0ne I understand that we found it too late
16:10:49 bauzas I wish you would be better than me explaining the issue and how to workaround for an ops
16:10:54 e0ne bauzas: ok, will do it a bit later today
16:11:14 bauzas e0ne: the problem is not really about the time, this is more about the gate block we have atm
16:11:22 lyarwood sorry back
16:11:33 gmann on gate url issue - I think we need to go with no trailing '/' in both place but we need to push changes on stable branches first to make grenade job work. basically in reverse order. I will try after an hr or so, currently in another meeting.
16:11:39 bauzas lyarwood: you had concerns on this bug, btw. take the mic

Earlier   Later