Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-07-12
14:37:01 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Final cleanups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800484
14:50:51 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add 'hw:vif_multiqueue_enabled' flavor extra spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792356
14:50:52 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Document virtio-net multiqueue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792362
14:50:53 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Move 'hw:pmu', 'hw_pmu' parsing to nova.virt.hardware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/792364
15:45:55 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Are you planning to respin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/798055 ?
16:03:39 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: oh am yes, maybe tomorrow
16:03:57 sean-k-mooney ill try and do it either later this eveining or in the morning
16:07:42 jgwentworth stephenfin: hey, I dunno if you saw my review on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/706295
16:09:19 stephenfin I did not. Weird. Maybe a merge conflict resolution gone wrong?
16:12:41 stephenfin nope, just copy-paste mistake from the other exceptions in there; will fix
16:14:05 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add func test for nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows --before https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/796744
16:18:06 stephenfin actually, I was copy-pasting from something else that was already broken and propagating the mistake \o/ https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/network/neutron.py#L434-L438
16:24:56 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use neutronclient's port binding APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/706295
19:03:29 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: add configurable per port bridges https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/798055
19:12:49 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: add configurable per port bridges https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/798055
19:14:46 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: ^ ok that should have adressed your nits
20:44:39 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] move instance claim to scheduler. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800560
21:35:19 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose: Support Consumer Types in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/800569
21:59:03 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose nova-audit spec for Xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/800570
22:01:55 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose: Support Consumer Types in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/800569
#openstack-nova - 2021-07-13
06:28:58 opendevreview Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Smartnic support - cyborg drive https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771362
06:28:58 opendevreview Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - new vnic type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771363
06:29:00 opendevreview Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - create arqs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758944
06:29:00 opendevreview Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - build instance with smartnic arqs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/798249
06:29:01 opendevreview Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - cleanup arqs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/798054
06:29:01 opendevreview Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - reject server move and suspend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/779913
06:29:02 opendevreview Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - functional tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/780147
08:41:15 gibi melwitt: I just saw your consumer type spec. I think I created a bad precedent with my RP re-parenting spec proposed in the nova-specs repo.
08:41:27 gibi At that time I thought that there is no spec tracking in placement
08:41:44 gibi but it turned out that there is ./doc/source/specs in the placement repository
08:44:02 gibi so we have two ways forward. Make the placement spec directiory freezed and use nova-specs for placement specs too, or duplicate my RP re-parenting spec there and move you consumer type spec to there.
09:22:09 kashyap sean-k-mooney: Hey, so I've got a Red Hat QE to do some migration tests w/ Cirrus and VirtIO - for Windows and Linux
09:23:18 kashyap sean-k-mooney: It all "just works". In brief, this was the test:
09:25:02 kashyap Have a Linux and Windows guest on source with 'cirrus', change the video model to 'virtio'; reboot the guest, and then live-migrate -- it succeeds just fine.
09:26:03 kashyap sean-k-mooney: And thanks for the review; just saw that
09:48:24 sean-k-mooney ok thats good to know for the new nova-manage command
09:49:29 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI to look up actual remote address https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611
09:51:25 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI to look up actual remote address https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611
09:53:06 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI middleware to find actual client ips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611
09:57:55 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI middleware to find actual client ips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611
10:00:30 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI middleware to find actual client ips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611
10:03:35 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use neutronclient's port binding APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/706295
10:03:39 stephenfin gibi: ^
10:04:13 stephenfin gibi: Fixed the single failing test and addressed the mypy complaint so that should be green now. I'll remind melwitt when she's about too
10:32:50 gibi stephenfin: ack, looking
11:21:56 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI middleware to find actual client ips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611
12:49:09 opendevreview Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP/DNM nova-manage: Introduce bdm show and refresh commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800634
13:31:31 ganso lyarwood, bauzas: if you have a minute to spare could you please take a look at this last backport of the anti-affinity series? It already has a +2, just needs a +W: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800114 Thanks in advance!
15:20:13 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI middleware to find actual client ips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611
15:48:04 gibi nova meeting starts in 12 minutes here in the channel
15:52:05 gibi stephenfin: you might want to drop your -1 from https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/798071 as you proposal was accepted last week on the meeting
15:52:36 stephenfin done
16:00:19 gibi #startmeeting nova
16:00:19 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Jul 13 16:00:19 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:19 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:19 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:01:26 gibi o/
16:01:55 stephenfin o/
16:02:15 sean-k-mooney o/
16:02:19 dansmith o/
16:02:41 elodilles o/
16:02:52 gmann o/
16:03:18 gibi #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:03:26 gibi no critical bug
16:03:33 gibi #link 14 new untriaged bugs (-11 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New
16:03:41 lyarwood \o
16:03:43 gibi thanks for the triage!
16:03:47 gibi (whoever did it)(
16:04:05 gibi is there any specific bug that we need to discuss?
16:04:36 gibi #topic Gate status
16:04:44 gibi Nova gate bugs #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure
16:04:54 stephenfin nice! (bug triage)
16:05:37 gibi looking at the gate bug list I dont see new bugs there
16:05:42 stephenfin subjectively, I'm still seeing a decent amount of nova-live-migration failures
16:05:52 stephenfin though it does feel like it's slightly better
16:06:04 stephenfin I'm assuming this is still the volume detach issue
16:06:36 lyarwood I've not had a chance to look tbh
16:06:37 gibi I had no time looking at the gate since the last meeting so I cannto commet
16:06:56 stephenfin ah, sorry, that was more of a statement than a question
16:07:04 lyarwood https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&branch=master&pipeline=gate&result=failure at least we haven't blocked anything
16:08:01 gibi there is one gate fix from melwitt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800313 that needs a second core
16:08:14 lyarwood https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-live-migration&project=openstack%2Fnova&branch=master&pipeline=check&result=failure but yeah there's a number of LM failures in check
16:08:20 stephenfin I'll grab that
16:08:25 gibi stephenfin: thanks
16:08:27 tosky related: the legacy jobs removal moved forward, the stable/train backport just requires a few small fixes: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/795435
16:08:36 stephenfin thought I already had, tbh...
16:09:53 gibi lyarwood: thanks for the links
16:09:56 elodilles tosky: train is not blocked, do we need that backport there?
16:10:55 tosky elodilles: I'd say it's worth it: it should help people who will keep on eye on that branch when a failure will happen
16:12:23 elodilles i see.... it's just.... really not that nice of a patch :]
16:12:52 elodilles for backport :X
16:13:32 gibi elodilles: so far we backported that to newer stable branches to unblock gate there?
16:13:56 elodilles well, it became like that in ussuri
16:14:11 elodilles in newer branches it was a *bit* nicer
16:14:37 elodilles but yes, we did backport it so far
16:14:47 elodilles until ussuri
16:14:58 elodilles since gate was broken back to ussuri
16:15:50 gibi so the gate is OK in train, so this becomes a nice to have compared to ussure where it was a must have
16:16:00 gibi anyhow I let the stable core team to decide
16:17:40 gibi let me know if you stuck on deciding and need my final ruling :)

Earlier   Later