| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-07-13 | |||
| 06:28:58 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Smartnic support - cyborg drive https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771362 | |
| 06:28:58 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - new vnic type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771363 | |
| 06:29:00 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - create arqs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758944 | |
| 06:29:00 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - build instance with smartnic arqs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/798249 | |
| 06:29:01 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - cleanup arqs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/798054 | |
| 06:29:01 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - reject server move and suspend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/779913 | |
| 06:29:02 | opendevreview | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - functional tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/780147 | |
| 08:41:15 | gibi | melwitt: I just saw your consumer type spec. I think I created a bad precedent with my RP re-parenting spec proposed in the nova-specs repo. | |
| 08:41:27 | gibi | At that time I thought that there is no spec tracking in placement | |
| 08:41:44 | gibi | but it turned out that there is ./doc/source/specs in the placement repository | |
| 08:44:02 | gibi | so we have two ways forward. Make the placement spec directiory freezed and use nova-specs for placement specs too, or duplicate my RP re-parenting spec there and move you consumer type spec to there. | |
| 09:22:09 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Hey, so I've got a Red Hat QE to do some migration tests w/ Cirrus and VirtIO - for Windows and Linux | |
| 09:23:18 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: It all "just works". In brief, this was the test: | |
| 09:25:02 | kashyap | Have a Linux and Windows guest on source with 'cirrus', change the video model to 'virtio'; reboot the guest, and then live-migrate -- it succeeds just fine. | |
| 09:26:03 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: And thanks for the review; just saw that | |
| 09:48:24 | sean-k-mooney | ok thats good to know for the new nova-manage command | |
| 09:49:29 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI to look up actual remote address https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611 | |
| 09:51:25 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI to look up actual remote address https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611 | |
| 09:53:06 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI middleware to find actual client ips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611 | |
| 09:57:55 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI middleware to find actual client ips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611 | |
| 10:00:30 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI middleware to find actual client ips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611 | |
| 10:03:35 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use neutronclient's port binding APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/706295 | |
| 10:03:39 | stephenfin | gibi: ^ | |
| 10:04:13 | stephenfin | gibi: Fixed the single failing test and addressed the mypy complaint so that should be green now. I'll remind melwitt when she's about too | |
| 10:32:50 | gibi | stephenfin: ack, looking | |
| 11:21:56 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI middleware to find actual client ips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611 | |
| 12:49:09 | opendevreview | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP/DNM nova-manage: Introduce bdm show and refresh commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800634 | |
| 13:31:31 | ganso | lyarwood, bauzas: if you have a minute to spare could you please take a look at this last backport of the anti-affinity series? It already has a +2, just needs a +W: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800114 Thanks in advance! | |
| 15:20:13 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Enable HTTPProxyToWSGI middleware to find actual client ips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/800611 | |
| 15:48:04 | gibi | nova meeting starts in 12 minutes here in the channel | |
| 15:52:05 | gibi | stephenfin: you might want to drop your -1 from https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/798071 as you proposal was accepted last week on the meeting | |
| 15:52:36 | stephenfin | done | |
| 16:00:19 | gibi | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:19 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Jul 13 16:00:19 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:19 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:19 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:01:26 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:01:55 | stephenfin | o/ | |
| 16:02:15 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:02:19 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:02:41 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:52 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:03:18 | gibi | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:26 | gibi | no critical bug | |
| 16:03:33 | gibi | #link 14 new untriaged bugs (-11 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New | |
| 16:03:41 | lyarwood | \o | |
| 16:03:43 | gibi | thanks for the triage! | |
| 16:03:47 | gibi | (whoever did it)( | |
| 16:04:05 | gibi | is there any specific bug that we need to discuss? | |
| 16:04:36 | gibi | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:44 | gibi | Nova gate bugs #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure | |
| 16:04:54 | stephenfin | nice! (bug triage) | |
| 16:05:37 | gibi | looking at the gate bug list I dont see new bugs there | |
| 16:05:42 | stephenfin | subjectively, I'm still seeing a decent amount of nova-live-migration failures | |
| 16:05:52 | stephenfin | though it does feel like it's slightly better | |
| 16:06:04 | stephenfin | I'm assuming this is still the volume detach issue | |
| 16:06:36 | lyarwood | I've not had a chance to look tbh | |
| 16:06:37 | gibi | I had no time looking at the gate since the last meeting so I cannto commet | |
| 16:06:56 | stephenfin | ah, sorry, that was more of a statement than a question | |
| 16:07:04 | lyarwood | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&branch=master&pipeline=gate&result=failure at least we haven't blocked anything | |
| 16:08:01 | gibi | there is one gate fix from melwitt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800313 that needs a second core | |
| 16:08:14 | lyarwood | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-live-migration&project=openstack%2Fnova&branch=master&pipeline=check&result=failure but yeah there's a number of LM failures in check | |
| 16:08:20 | stephenfin | I'll grab that | |
| 16:08:25 | gibi | stephenfin: thanks | |
| 16:08:27 | tosky | related: the legacy jobs removal moved forward, the stable/train backport just requires a few small fixes: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/795435 | |
| 16:08:36 | stephenfin | thought I already had, tbh... | |
| 16:09:53 | gibi | lyarwood: thanks for the links | |
| 16:09:56 | elodilles | tosky: train is not blocked, do we need that backport there? | |
| 16:10:55 | tosky | elodilles: I'd say it's worth it: it should help people who will keep on eye on that branch when a failure will happen | |
| 16:12:23 | elodilles | i see.... it's just.... really not that nice of a patch :] | |
| 16:12:52 | elodilles | for backport :X | |
| 16:13:32 | gibi | elodilles: so far we backported that to newer stable branches to unblock gate there? | |
| 16:13:56 | elodilles | well, it became like that in ussuri | |
| 16:14:11 | elodilles | in newer branches it was a *bit* nicer | |
| 16:14:37 | elodilles | but yes, we did backport it so far | |
| 16:14:47 | elodilles | until ussuri | |
| 16:14:58 | elodilles | since gate was broken back to ussuri | |
| 16:15:50 | gibi | so the gate is OK in train, so this becomes a nice to have compared to ussure where it was a must have | |
| 16:16:00 | gibi | anyhow I let the stable core team to decide | |
| 16:17:40 | gibi | let me know if you stuck on deciding and need my final ruling :) | |
| 16:17:57 | gibi | moving on | |
| 16:18:04 | gibi | the placement gate status looks green | |
| 16:18:16 | gibi | any other topic about the gate? | |
| 16:19:25 | gibi | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:19:29 | gibi | Milestone 2 is Thursday (15 of July) which is spec freeze | |
| 16:19:45 | gibi | we have couple of open specs | |
| 16:19:45 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:open | |
| 16:19:55 | gibi | melwitt: has two re-propose specs that needs a second core | |
| 16:20:33 | gibi | nova-audit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/800570 | |
| 16:20:41 | gibi | and | |
| 16:20:43 | gibi | consumer types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/800569 | |
| 16:21:14 | gibi | these are pretty easy to get in before the deadline I think | |
| 16:21:32 | gibi | there is one more spec with only positive feedback https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/787458 | |
| 16:21:40 | gibi | Integration With Off-path Network Backends ^^ | |
| 16:22:15 | gibi | I sean-k-mooney said in the review that we wait for bauzas to review | |
| 16:22:31 | gibi | but I think bauzas is already on PTO | |
| 16:22:45 | stephenfin | he is | |
| 16:22:46 | sean-k-mooney | i think part of the concern there is the neutorn apporval and ovn support | |
| 16:23:08 | sean-k-mooney | we could approve it for this cycle but im not sure the depencies will line up before feature freeze | |
| 16:23:34 | sean-k-mooney | so we could leave that to the implemantion reivew and be optimistic or defer | |