| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-03-11 | |||
| 19:21:35 | stephenfin | instead of hacking them together like we're doing /o\ | |
| 19:21:47 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: so here is the testing i did yesterday https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778350/7#message-0bb79aad698ad4acacfec150e80d58d7abc1d09b | |
| 19:22:17 | sean-k-mooney | im going to block all the ops that did not work with the 403 and same exception i have in that other patch | |
| 19:22:27 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/780065/1/nova/exception.py | |
| 19:23:25 | sean-k-mooney | that i was also goign to add a user dock liek we have for port resouce requests | |
| 19:23:38 | sean-k-mooney | https://docs.openstack.org/api-guide/compute/port_with_resource_request.html | |
| 19:24:34 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: nice | |
| 19:25:19 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I finished reading the vdpa patches (I ignored mlock for now) I have nothing major blocking this. But I will not be around to review the incoming reno and ops blocking patch today | |
| 19:26:10 | sean-k-mooney | ya its getting late for you thanks for staying with it so far | |
| 19:26:22 | gibi | stephenfin, sean-k-mooney: is it OK for you if we treat this now as a possible FFE | |
| 19:26:25 | gibi | ? | |
| 19:26:42 | gibi | I can do the remaining reviews tomorrow morning | |
| 19:26:45 | sean-k-mooney | i was not sure if we were going to have any but if you would be ok with that then yes | |
| 19:26:46 | stephenfin | sure, wfm. It'd be nice to be able to get dinner :) | |
| 19:27:11 | gibi | OK, then I will check where we are tomorrow morning | |
| 19:27:15 | sean-k-mooney | i can email the list and formally request one if you like | |
| 19:27:22 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: yes please | |
| 19:27:27 | sean-k-mooney | ok will do | |
| 19:27:37 | gibi | you can refer to me and stephenfin as supporters for the FFE | |
| 19:27:51 | gibi | this is really close and it is useful | |
| 19:28:06 | gibi | so I'm willing to spend timeon this tomorrow and early next week | |
| 19:28:09 | sean-k-mooney | ok ill wait for the irc logs to catch up and ill also link to this conversation | |
| 19:28:12 | gibi | to get it approvaed | |
| 19:28:18 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: sure | |
| 19:28:24 | sean-k-mooney | gibi++ | |
| 19:28:24 | gibi | OK, I'm leaving now | |
| 19:28:31 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 19:28:32 | gibi | o/ | |
| 19:28:37 | stephenfin | ciao | |
| 20:03:13 | sean-k-mooney | ok so i have a small bug here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/770533/10/nova/virt/libvirt/host.py#1237 so ill respin that patch and add testing to make sure claiming the PF handels the VDPA devices correctly | |
| 20:06:32 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Dynamically archive FK related records in archive_deleted_rows https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/773834 | |
| 21:09:04 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: tests: Add functional test for vDPA device https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/780112 | |
| 21:09:11 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: so that's not done, but you should be able to see where it's going. I'll finish it in the morning ^ | |
| 21:10:40 | sean-k-mooney | thanks | |
| 21:10:47 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: nw. Don't forget to file the FFE email :) | |
| 21:11:19 | sean-k-mooney | i fixed the bug i had and now im testing the PF issue that gibi asked about | |
| 21:11:40 | sean-k-mooney | ill send the email yeas | |
| #openstack-nova - 2021-03-12 | |||
| 01:26:16 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add vDPA nodedev parsing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/770533 | |
| 01:26:16 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add guest generation for vDPA https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/770532 | |
| 01:26:17 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: pci: Add vDPA vnic to PCI request mapping and filtering https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778350 | |
| 01:26:18 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add hw:mlock extra spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778347 | |
| 05:34:47 | openstackgerrit | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: smartnic support - functional tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/780147 | |
| 08:11:51 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: ack, looking | |
| 08:13:22 | gibi | yonglihe: hi! Is it possible to test the smartnic series in a devstack with the fake cyborg driver? | |
| 08:14:16 | yonglihe | functional test it is. devstack, we need real hw for that. | |
| 08:15:31 | yonglihe | except that, the devstack have some feature to accept the VM stuck to a none-exit pci devices as succeefuly state(that expected off cause). | |
| 08:16:32 | yonglihe | If we also use a faked libvirt, that workable. | |
| 08:20:17 | yonglihe | gibi: btw, othe comments gonna take me 2 or 3 days hard work. | |
| 08:21:37 | gibi | yonglihe: so the devstack + cyborg fake driver solution doesn't work as the fake driver returns nonexistent pci device and that cannot be added to the VM. thank make sense. | |
| 08:21:44 | gibi | yonglihe: which comment is the hard one? | |
| 08:22:11 | yonglihe | code reactors. | |
| 08:22:16 | yonglihe | refactors | |
| 08:22:34 | yonglihe | but we have solutions for that. | |
| 08:25:27 | yonglihe | The one need decouple the flavor arq from port-arq need more force, that cofused everyone. | |
| 08:25:36 | gibi | I see | |
| 08:26:04 | gibi | alex_xu: will you be around in the next week to review the smartnic series ? | |
| 08:26:09 | yonglihe | but we could use port uuid instead of instace uuid as arq consumer, that will much more clear | |
| 08:26:23 | gibi | hm that sounds like a good idea | |
| 08:31:39 | alex_xu | gibi: yes, I will be there to review the smartnic series | |
| 08:31:47 | gibi | alex_xu: thanks | |
| 08:32:20 | alex_xu | np | |
| 08:32:50 | gibi | yonglihe: how do you feel can you propose the fixes not later than Wednesday next week? | |
| 08:33:56 | yonglihe | Your Wednesday, thats sounds ok for me. | |
| 08:35:58 | gibi | Ok | |
| 08:50:31 | bauzas | good morning Nova | |
| 08:51:47 | bauzas | have we discussed on FFEs ? | |
| 08:52:26 | bauzas | nvm http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/020772.html | |
| 08:53:27 | gibi | bauzas: yepp, and we have two requested on the ML | |
| 08:53:38 | bauzas | I see the smartnic ones | |
| 08:53:45 | bauzas | hence my question | |
| 08:53:51 | gibi | bauzas: sean-k-mooney requested one for the vdpa too | |
| 08:54:00 | bauzas | oh, the vdpa one | |
| 08:54:23 | gibi | if you read the scrollback then you see my discussion with yonglihe and alex_xu about the smartnic one | |
| 08:54:39 | gibi | from this morning | |
| 08:54:41 | bauzas | the vdpa one got eyes on it yesterday AFAICT | |
| 08:54:51 | bauzas | but what about the smartnic one ? | |
| 08:54:51 | gibi | bauzas: yes, and we found a bug | |
| 08:55:14 | gibi | bauzas: so the vdpa one is pretty close as sean-k-mooney fixed the bug during the night | |
| 08:55:40 | gibi | bauzas: for vdpa we need a patch that blocks unsupported operations like live-migrate, and needs a reno | |
| 08:55:42 | bauzas | merging stuff on today seems reasonable to me provided we kinda verify we don't really change a lot | |
| 08:56:12 | bauzas | like, adding new stuff looks good to me, but for example, asking to have a new ovo field, no | |
| 08:56:14 | gibi | I think we have a good chance to approve the vdpa one today | |
| 08:56:26 | bauzas | gibi: ok, and for smartnic ? | |
| 08:56:33 | gibi | that is a bigger step | |
| 08:56:35 | bauzas | gibi: I can try to look at it | |
| 08:56:38 | bauzas | hah | |
| 08:56:44 | gibi | I had various comments yesterday | |
| 08:56:54 | bauzas | I'll quickly look at the series | |
| 08:57:14 | gibi | yonglihe thinks the hard parts of that can be fixed not later than Wednesday | |
| 08:57:26 | gibi | bauzas: and alex_xu confirmed that he will be around to review | |
| 08:57:35 | bauzas | because as i said, if they want to modify some RPC APIs or want to change ov.o objects or DB, then I wouldn't be super happy | |
| 08:57:52 | bauzas | gibi: well, Wednesday is a bit late, no ? :- | |
| 08:57:53 | bauzas | :( | |
| 08:58:01 | gibi | it is a stretch | |
| 08:58:25 | bauzas | again, my concern is not really about when, but rather about what's modified | |
| 08:58:26 | gibi | bauzas: when you say no new ovo field do you mean we should not merge anything after tomorrow that changes an ovo? | |
| 08:58:31 | bauzas | yes | |
| 08:58:34 | bauzas | or a RPC API | |
| 08:58:37 | bauzas | or a DB upgrade | |
| 08:58:39 | bauzas | or... | |