Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-01-18
12:28:38 lyarwood gibi: I think the success event can be async
12:28:39 gibi lyarwood: so the happy case still can be async?
12:28:45 sean-k-mooney but on a fast host it will be almost instant
12:28:49 lyarwood right
12:28:50 gibi cool, then the event waiting code is better
12:29:14 lyarwood right that allows us to wait longer
12:29:31 lyarwood as we should get an event back when the device does eventually detach
12:30:40 gibi I will do more test to see why we don't get any event back from libvirt at the first detach attempt
12:30:45 gibi in the above scenario
12:30:56 gibi as that missing event is bothering me
12:31:00 sean-k-mooney gibi: you could try doing "sudo cpulimit -l 1 -e libvirtd" or "sudo cpulimit -l 1 -p <libvirtd pid>"
12:31:09 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks I will try
12:31:26 sean-k-mooney that should limit libvirt to 1% of 1 core
12:33:43 lyarwood gibi: we don't get the event as the device is still attached to the live config
12:34:06 lyarwood gibi: and failure is for sync failures where QEMU rejects the request to detach
12:34:07 gibi lyarwood: but we expect that libvirt will detach from the live config as we asked for it
12:34:17 gibi in the first request
12:34:19 lyarwood gibi: we expect that it should try
12:34:32 gibi and if fails then it should tell us it failed, isn't it?
12:35:04 kashyap gibi: lyarwood: So, Peter Krempa came back; let me post the chat summary snippet here, from #virt, OFTC:
12:35:05 lyarwood gibi: no, again the failure event is for when QEMU tells libvirt that it can't detach the device when the request is initially made
12:35:36 lyarwood gibi: if that request is accepted but the guestos doesn't allow the device to detach then we don't get anything back
12:35:49 lyarwood that's my understanding at least, lets see what kashyap has
12:36:50 kashyap lyarwood: Yeah; now I hear some additional subtleties; I'm going to post the full summary on the change; and we all can read and discuss here
12:48:20 kashyap gibi: lyarwood: Done; see here (I also like DanPB's advice on dealin w/ active vs. inactive config separately): https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/770246/7/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#2330
12:51:29 kashyap Let me know if that answers your question; if not, please note there, if anything doesn't add up :-)
12:51:34 gibi sorry, I'm on a call
12:51:53 kashyap No rush at all
13:00:34 gibi kashyap: thanks for the summary, I will work DanPB's suggestion into the patch as handling the live an the persistent config separately feels cleaner to me too
13:03:01 kashyap Np
13:22:21 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Drop support for Xen https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/743231
13:22:21 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Bump MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU}_VERSION and NEXT_MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU}_VERSION https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/754700
13:43:36 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Nova supports password encrypted VNC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/622336
14:24:40 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Can you fix the failures on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/765901 real quick?
14:25:42 sean-k-mooney oh it failed yes ill do it now
14:26:04 sean-k-mooney sorry should have ran pep8
14:30:27 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: for the leading underscore
14:30:30 sean-k-mooney for [2]
14:30:37 sean-k-mooney shoudl it be [_2]
14:30:38 stephenfin *trailing
14:30:42 stephenfin [2]_
14:30:51 sean-k-mooney oh
14:31:07 sean-k-mooney and the first one does not need that?
14:31:20 stephenfin you already have it on the first one :)
14:31:41 sean-k-mooney oh for [1]_
14:31:49 sean-k-mooney i have another instance of [2] before that
14:31:56 sean-k-mooney cool ill fix them all
14:35:36 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add port scoped numa affinity spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/765901
14:36:19 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: i think ^ fixes everything
14:36:30 sean-k-mooney let me know if there is anything else and ill respin
14:36:39 stephenfin will do
14:44:36 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: I have my doubt about that policy amendment to the modernize os-hypervisors API spec
14:44:53 stephenfin "namely the idea that we shoudl allow users with the PROECT_ADMIN role to list all hyperviors there project is allowed to acess via the summary endpoint"
14:45:41 stephenfin there doesn't appear to be anything that restrict projects to specific hypervisor(s)
14:45:59 stephenfin at least there's no tenant or project attribute of the ComputeNode or Service objects
14:46:07 stephenfin did you have something specific in mind?
15:00:13 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Move query param generation to RequestGroup o.vo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/756894
15:01:45 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor _claim_pci_device_for_interface_attach to prepare for qos https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/756895
15:03:08 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Allow extending an existing instance allocation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/757109
15:04:31 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make remove allocation symmetric with add allocation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/757110
15:06:22 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Factor out port resource deallocation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/757111
15:08:09 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor update_pci_request_spec_with_allocated_interface_name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/757614
15:09:29 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Enable mypy on scheduler/utils.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769942
15:10:51 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor ResourceRequest constructor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/769720
15:12:15 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support interface attach with QoS ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/756530
15:13:39 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Enable mypy on scheduler/report.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765152
15:14:38 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unused Instance method https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/757615
15:15:00 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: i intened to reuse the aggreate metadtaa used for the teannt afinity filters
15:15:15 sean-k-mooney we use the same metadat for both the placment prefilter or the post filter
15:15:37 sean-k-mooney the prefilter allwos you to do stict tenant isolation
15:15:51 sean-k-mooney so that only a given tenatn can use member of a give aggreate
15:18:26 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/rocky/admin/configuration/schedulers.html#tenant-isolation-with-placement
15:18:52 sean-k-mooney you do openstack aggregate set --property filter_tenant_id=9691591f913949818a514f95286a6b90 myagg
15:19:00 sean-k-mooney to restict the usage
15:19:12 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: so the check you would do is simple.
15:19:20 sean-k-mooney gretrive all aggreate with the current teant id
15:19:26 sean-k-mooney show only host in those aggreates
15:20:01 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: if the list is of aggrates is empty then list all hosts
15:20:21 sean-k-mooney since that tenant is unconfiged
15:20:53 stephenfin makes sense
15:31:26 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Do not inherit os_glance properties on snapshot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/771234
15:49:53 stephenfin gibi: Could you stick https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764482/ on your review queue, please?
15:50:10 gibi stephenfin: on it
15:53:09 lyarwood has anyone hit https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1912178 locally today?
15:53:10 openstack Launchpad bug 1912178 in tempest "Links are not allowed as constraints (pip 20.2.4)" [Undecided,New]
15:53:27 stephenfin not me
15:53:51 gibi lyarwood: yes
15:53:53 lyarwood weird, I'm not sure what is adding the URI to the constraints list
15:54:02 lyarwood oh cool not just me then, cool
15:54:38 gibi lyarwood: I think devstack edits the constraints list based on what repos/libs you asked in the local.conf to be cloned
15:55:09 gibi lyarwood: as far as I understand the issue appears if somehow the pip version gets updated in your devstack vm
15:55:28 gibi lyarwood: for me, in a clean ubuntu 20.04 the first devstack stach.sh works
15:55:45 gibi but subsequnt unstack.sh && stack.sh fails with the above rror
15:56:47 lyarwood gibi: yeah I was about to say I've not touched the version of pip in this env
15:57:10 gibi lyarwood: I suspect that the stach.sh runs some update if it is not in a clean vM
15:57:14 gibi but I have no proof
16:00:50 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: WIP/DNM libvirt: Start emitting DeviceRemovedEvent and DeviceRemovalFailedEvent events https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/749929
16:00:50 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Replace blind retry with libvirt event waiting in detach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/770246
16:02:00 lyarwood gibi: fun, so I've updated pip and it seems to be working now
16:02:15 gibi hm, interesting

Earlier   Later