Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-01-11
21:32:43 openstackgerrit Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for allocation candidates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760237
21:32:44 openstackgerrit Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for inventories https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760238
21:32:45 openstackgerrit Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for resource classes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760239
21:32:47 openstackgerrit Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for traits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760241
21:32:51 openstackgerrit Lance Bragstad proposed openstack/placement master: Implement secure RBAC for usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/760242
22:19:21 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: api: Drop statistics-style fields from os-hypervisors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764040
#openstack-nova - 2021-01-12
02:54:36 alex_xu gibi: bauzas could you help me confirm this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/729563/26/nova/conductor/manager.py#1023, it looks like a bug we left before or I missed something. also not sure if we can move forware with fix later or not. just trying help brinzhang move forward his patch.
08:07:01 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: Nova supports password encrypted VNC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/622336
08:31:19 gibi alex_xu: ack, I will check
08:32:03 gibi lyarwood: I have to be away for keyboard for couple of hours this morning but I made some progress with the device detach code I will push it soon then at some point we can try to discuss it
08:36:27 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM try to replace retry with libvirt event in detach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/770246
08:37:17 gibi lyarwood: ^^
09:41:23 lyarwood gibi: ack cool np, I'll take a look
10:55:10 bauzas sean-k-mooney: around ?
10:55:25 bauzas I'm facing a problem with the neutron API
10:55:37 bauzas I can't ask for getting the segments for a specific subnet
10:55:54 bauzas https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/index.html?expanded=list-segments-detail#segments
10:59:24 bauzas actually, https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/index.html?#segment-extension
11:00:29 bauzas we could get the segment ID from the subnet
11:43:16 sean-k-mooney bauzas: you don tneed too
11:43:22 sean-k-mooney the segment id is in the subnet
11:43:42 sean-k-mooney get the subnet id from the port then look up the subnet to get the id
11:44:21 sean-k-mooney if the subnet does not have a segemnt id then its not a routed network
11:52:45 bauzas right, that's what I found
12:47:34 alex_xu gibi: thanks
13:17:20 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replaces tenant_id with project_id from List/Update Servers APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764292
13:17:20 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Replace all_tenants with all_projects in List Server APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/765311
13:43:45 stephenfin gibi: So who's got the 2.89 microversion?
13:43:55 stephenfin Just started looking at brinzhang's series above ^
13:44:01 gibi stephenfin: did you get 2.88?
13:44:02 stephenfin (assuming you know)
13:44:08 stephenfin I did, yeah. That's merged
13:44:11 gibi cool
13:44:31 gibi then I think the tenant_id series was closer to merge than the vnc password series
13:44:44 gibi but the vnc password series was updated recently
13:44:52 gibi but I haven't had time to get back to it to re-review
13:45:01 gibi so like 70-30 for the tenant_id
13:45:03 brinzhang gibi, stephenfin: I would like ti use 2.90
13:45:17 gibi brinzhang: which patch to use 2.90?
13:45:17 brinzhang make the noVNC patch pre in tenant_id
13:45:32 gibi OK, so first vnc and then tenant_id?
13:45:37 brinzhang yes
13:45:41 gibi brinzhang: cool, noted
13:45:57 brinzhang so pls review noVNC in privority
13:46:09 gibi brinzhang: will try
13:46:14 gibi (bit bussy with other pressing things)
13:46:25 brinzhang and I rebase the tenatn_id patch recently
13:46:32 brinzhang gibi: thanks
13:47:41 gibi brinzhang: I see you made the patches depend on each other so there is now a single chain of patches staring with vnc and then continued with tenant_id
13:47:46 gibi that is helpful
13:47:48 gibi thanks for that
13:48:19 brinzhang gibi: I would like we can merge the cyborg shelve/unshelve too, it's too long for me to concern it
13:48:21 gibi stephenfin: I guess you got your answer, the vnc patch is pretty small
13:48:32 gibi brinzhang: I know
13:48:39 gibi brinzhang: that is on my plate too
13:48:53 gibi alex pinged me with some questions in the unshelve patch
13:49:12 stephenfin gibi: brinzhang: Okay, I'll focus my immediate efforts on that instead so. Thanks
13:49:38 brinzhang yes, alex_xu's question may we can resoulve by a bug fix, may it's a common issue
13:49:39 gibi stephenfin: thanks. I made one review round on vnc before but had some concerns so I will need to go back to that too
13:49:49 brinzhang stephenfin: thanks
14:01:39 stephenfin gibi, lyarwood, sean-k-mooney: if you have some spare time today, my final four (for now anyway) feature gap patches for OSC would benefit from nova dev eyes https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/python-openstackclient+is:open+owner:stephenfin%2540redhat.com+branch:master+file:compute+is:mergeable
14:02:06 stephenfin I'll try update mriedem's OSC gap etherpad at some point this week to ensure everything is captured. I think I've got most of it so far
14:02:25 gibi stephenfin: ack, it is open in my queue
14:03:35 stephenfin gibi: Thanks
14:08:13 lyarwood yup same
15:21:34 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Fix undesirable raw Python error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/769082
15:42:32 sean-k-mooney stephenfin reviewed suggestions inline
15:43:08 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: nothing major, more or less looks fine
15:58:14 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM try to replace retry with libvirt event in detach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/770246
15:58:20 gibi lyarwood: sorry it was a hectic day. I my current attempt on the detach event ^^ it passes some volume and interface detach tempest cases locally and the logs seems OK. But I have no way to generate slow libvirt related scenarios ^^
15:58:26 gibi and again I have to leave the keyboard
15:58:37 gibi so we can talk about it maybe today
15:59:31 gibi melwitt: ^^
15:59:41 gibi s/today/tomorrow/
16:01:40 sean-k-mooney gibi: in func test you could jsut add a sleep right
16:02:23 lyarwood sean-k-mooney: the race is within QEMU so that isn't going to help unfortunatley
16:02:44 sean-k-mooney well its not really
16:03:10 sean-k-mooney the race was we were just retyrin gon a timer while the async operation in qemu was running
16:04:01 sean-k-mooney we cant recreate that behavior but we can simulate a slow libvirt event
16:04:16 sean-k-mooney it depends on what gibi actully wanted to recreate
16:05:21 lyarwood I don't see any value in simulating a slow event tbh, we should just be asserting that we don't retry the detach without getting a _FAILED event back from libvirt etc
16:05:46 sean-k-mooney lyarwood: well we could do that by posing the detach call
16:06:38 sean-k-mooney e.g. after the first invocation make it soe it raises an error if called again until we fail or complete
16:07:36 sean-k-mooney anyway im going to jsut review what gibi has instead of speculating
16:33:20 bauzas sean-k-mooney: quick question, do you know if an instance has 2 ports, the instance should use the same subnet for routed networks ?
16:35:24 bauzas nevermind, I'll provide a FIXME
16:36:18 sean-k-mooney no it can have different subnets in that case but they should be on the same segment
16:36:28 sean-k-mooney well technically that is not required either
16:36:36 sean-k-mooney but the host need to be connect ot both segment
16:36:46 sean-k-mooney if the subnets are form different ones
16:37:14 sean-k-mooney we need a host that would be in the intersection of all segments required by the ports
16:37:38 sean-k-mooney the simpelst case of tha twould be both ports are in the same subnet/segment
16:37:59 sean-k-mooney if the host has multiple nic however you can have other toplogies that are valid
17:09:59 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: addressed your comments on https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/python-openstackclient+is:open+owner:stephenfin%2540redhat.com+branch:master+file:compute+is:mergeable
17:10:05 stephenfin let me know if anything isn't clear :)
17:12:15 sean-k-mooney thanks ill rereview them now
17:24:49 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: im +1 on the 4 patches now
17:24:58 stephenfin thanks!
17:25:00 sean-k-mooney thanks for respinning them
17:25:13 stephenfin nw, good to have other eyes on them

Earlier   Later