Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-09-17
10:29:07 lyarwood stephenfin: I can do that in the test itself as well tbh
10:55:11 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test for bug #1895696 https://review.opendev.org/752247
10:55:11 openstack bug 1895696 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "unable to boot instance from encrypted volume created from a glance image of an encrypted volume" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1895696 - Assigned to Lee Yarwood (lyarwood)
10:55:11 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Skip cinder_encryption_key_id check when booting from volume https://review.opendev.org/752090
10:55:11 lyarwood stephenfin: ^ there you go, slightly more self contained now.
10:55:24 lyarwood stephenfin: should be easy enough to backport as well
11:16:31 gibi lyarwood: +2 from me, sorry to take soo long I was distracted midday
11:17:11 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test for bug #1895696 https://review.opendev.org/752247
11:17:11 openstack bug 1895696 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "unable to boot instance from encrypted volume created from a glance image of an encrypted volume" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1895696 - Assigned to Lee Yarwood (lyarwood)
11:17:11 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Skip cinder_encryption_key_id check when booting from volume https://review.opendev.org/752090
11:17:13 lyarwood gibi: np, ^ just sorted the nit out quickly
11:19:24 gibi thanks
11:24:47 openstackgerrit Hemanth Nakkina proposed openstack/nova master: Update pci stat pools based on PCI device changes https://review.opendev.org/749175
12:00:27 nightmare_unreal brinzhang_: hello \0 , brinzhang. Can you please see my comment on your patch : https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675304/ . Thanks
12:02:39 brinzhang_ nightmare_unreal: of course ^^
12:04:05 brinzhang_ nightmare_unreal: IMO, this patch is ready a looong time, but I dont know the where need to change, and why no-body +2 or -1 for it
12:05:47 sean-k-mooney brinzhang_: it looks like it has not really got any code review
12:05:57 sean-k-mooney at least not in the last year or so
12:06:30 sean-k-mooney nightmare_unreal: brinzhang_ so ye need to join the sdk/osc irc channel and talk to the core team about it
12:06:36 nightmare_unreal can we please have a review for that patch
12:06:37 brinzhang_ IMHO, since mriedem left, there is no body care that pach
12:07:08 nightmare_unreal brinzhang_: i am in #osc channel but couldn't find your username
12:07:15 nightmare_unreal i mean sdk
12:07:15 sean-k-mooney this is not the correct channel to ask in really. i think stephenfin might have osc core rights
12:07:26 nightmare_unreal yeah right, sorry about the noise
12:07:33 nightmare_unreal we will move the disucssion
12:07:44 sean-k-mooney its ok to bring it up
12:07:50 sean-k-mooney its for nova migrations
12:08:05 sean-k-mooney but just bring it up here wont help get it merged
12:08:18 nightmare_unreal haha true
12:08:19 sean-k-mooney it might make sense to add a ptg topic
12:08:28 sean-k-mooney or a mailing list topic
12:08:29 brinzhang_ nightmare_unreal: yes, it also belongs to nova ^^
12:08:38 sean-k-mooney it might make sense to add teh core teams to osc
12:09:11 sean-k-mooney i.e. so each project core team that does not ahve a plugin can review there onw part of osc
12:09:25 nightmare_unreal I see
12:09:48 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney: ok, I will add the osc core to that patch
12:11:12 brinzhang_ nightmare_unreal: which channel?
12:11:35 brinzhang_ #osc, #sdk seems not right
12:11:43 sean-k-mooney #openstack-sdk
12:12:02 sean-k-mooney actully no that no right
12:12:04 sean-k-mooney one sec
12:12:10 nightmare_unreal i am in #openstack-sdks
12:12:18 sean-k-mooney ah yes plural
12:12:25 nightmare_unreal yup
12:13:08 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney, nightmare_unreal: thanks
12:15:29 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney> Maybe I cannot add all osc core as the reviewer, sometimes they dont like do that way :(
12:15:51 sean-k-mooney generally you are better off to ask for reviews in irc
12:16:20 sean-k-mooney if now one responds then after a day or two look at who has been active in stackaltics and add one or two
12:16:56 brinzhang_ yeah, this is a good way
12:17:12 sean-k-mooney https://www.stackalytics.com/?module=python-openstackclient&release=victoria
12:18:12 sean-k-mooney frickler nad gtema
12:18:19 sean-k-mooney *and
12:18:22 brinzhang_ Aha, I was missed this place, here we can know who is active in the project/model
12:18:31 sean-k-mooney yep
12:18:39 sean-k-mooney they are likely your best bet
12:18:54 sean-k-mooney monty has recently left openstack developement and changed job
12:19:23 brinzhang_ ack, thank for your help
12:21:00 brinzhang_ nightmare_unreal> I think I will review your patch tomorrow, I will go later, my timezone is UTC+8, thx
12:23:26 nightmare_unreal thanks brinzhang_ . Understood
12:46:36 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: tests: Remove '_FakeImageService' https://review.opendev.org/745908
12:52:47 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Use cell targeted context to query instance metadata https://review.opendev.org/752459
13:03:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: functional: Don't inherit from 'ProviderUsageBaseTestCase' https://review.opendev.org/751351
13:03:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Don't unset Instance.old_flavor, new_flavor until necessary https://review.opendev.org/751352
13:35:54 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Victoria 22.0.0 prelude section https://review.opendev.org/751045
13:36:47 bauzas gibi: stephenfin: takashi made a good comment on https://review.opendev.org/751045, could you please review again ?
13:37:01 bauzas ideally, we could merge this prelude now and just amend it in a later change if we need
13:37:28 stephenfin done
13:55:31 bauzas thanks
13:56:31 gibi will check soon
13:56:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Removed the host FQDN from the exception message https://review.opendev.org/749613
14:00:58 bauzas gibi: I saw you already looked at https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1884217
14:00:58 openstack Launchpad bug 1884217 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Nova informs Placement too early upon Ironic instance deletion" [Undecided,New]
14:01:12 bauzas gibi: this one seems legit to me but the bugfix isn't easy
14:16:12 lyarwood gibi: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1888237 - shouldn't this be moved to fix released btw?
14:16:12 openstack Launchpad bug 1888237 in Ubuntu "nova-next job fails as novnc service fails with TypeError: _wrap_socket() argument 1 must be _socket.socket, not GreenSSLSocket" [Undecided,New]
14:28:22 openstackgerrit Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Removed the host FQDN from the exception message https://review.opendev.org/752477
14:30:53 gibi bauzas: I've just tagged https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1884217 I don't know the way forward with it
14:30:53 openstack Launchpad bug 1884217 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Nova informs Placement too early upon Ironic instance deletion" [Low,Incomplete]
14:31:59 gibi lyarwood: you are correct. Now I marked it such
14:32:20 lyarwood gibi: coolio :)
14:32:33 gibi thanks for noticing
14:32:45 gibi bauzas: so if you have ideas how to fix please comment to the bug
14:33:02 gibi nvm
14:33:07 gibi I see your comment now
14:44:41 stephenfin elod, lyarwood, melwitt: Obviously the top few of these are still blocked by their Ussuri equivalents, but could you add https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bug/1879878+status:open+branch:stable/train to your review queues?
14:46:23 lyarwood ack
14:51:47 elod stephenfin: sure, will do
14:53:56 stephenfin thanks
14:57:23 elod stephenfin: btw, can those heavy test refactors be avoided somehow?
14:58:15 stephenfin elod: Do you mean the first three patches I brought into the series or the changes I made to later patches?
14:59:52 elod stephenfin: for example this one: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/I33d8ac0a1cae0b2d275a21287d5e44c008a68122
15:00:17 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Add regression test for bug #1895696 https://review.opendev.org/752485
15:00:17 openstack bug 1895696 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "unable to boot instance from encrypted volume created from a glance image of an encrypted volume" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1895696 - Assigned to Lee Yarwood (lyarwood)
15:00:18 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: compute: Skip cinder_encryption_key_id check when booting from volume https://review.opendev.org/752486
15:01:02 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Add regression test for bug #1895696 https://review.opendev.org/752487
15:01:04 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Create volume attachment during boot from volume in compute https://review.opendev.org/752488
15:01:04 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: compute: Skip cinder_encryption_key_id check when booting from volume https://review.opendev.org/752489
15:01:09 stephenfin elod: So the former. I could, but it would involve even more significant rewriting of the tests I'm bringing back plus significant rewrite of any future tests that depend on this feature
15:01:15 lyarwood stephenfin: ^ as requested

Earlier   Later