Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-09-17
12:12:02 sean-k-mooney actully no that no right
12:12:04 sean-k-mooney one sec
12:12:10 nightmare_unreal i am in #openstack-sdks
12:12:18 sean-k-mooney ah yes plural
12:12:25 nightmare_unreal yup
12:13:08 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney, nightmare_unreal: thanks
12:15:29 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney> Maybe I cannot add all osc core as the reviewer, sometimes they dont like do that way :(
12:15:51 sean-k-mooney generally you are better off to ask for reviews in irc
12:16:20 sean-k-mooney if now one responds then after a day or two look at who has been active in stackaltics and add one or two
12:16:56 brinzhang_ yeah, this is a good way
12:17:12 sean-k-mooney https://www.stackalytics.com/?module=python-openstackclient&release=victoria
12:18:12 sean-k-mooney frickler nad gtema
12:18:19 sean-k-mooney *and
12:18:22 brinzhang_ Aha, I was missed this place, here we can know who is active in the project/model
12:18:31 sean-k-mooney yep
12:18:39 sean-k-mooney they are likely your best bet
12:18:54 sean-k-mooney monty has recently left openstack developement and changed job
12:19:23 brinzhang_ ack, thank for your help
12:21:00 brinzhang_ nightmare_unreal> I think I will review your patch tomorrow, I will go later, my timezone is UTC+8, thx
12:23:26 nightmare_unreal thanks brinzhang_ . Understood
12:46:36 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: tests: Remove '_FakeImageService' https://review.opendev.org/745908
12:52:47 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Use cell targeted context to query instance metadata https://review.opendev.org/752459
13:03:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: functional: Don't inherit from 'ProviderUsageBaseTestCase' https://review.opendev.org/751351
13:03:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Don't unset Instance.old_flavor, new_flavor until necessary https://review.opendev.org/751352
13:35:54 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Victoria 22.0.0 prelude section https://review.opendev.org/751045
13:36:47 bauzas gibi: stephenfin: takashi made a good comment on https://review.opendev.org/751045, could you please review again ?
13:37:01 bauzas ideally, we could merge this prelude now and just amend it in a later change if we need
13:37:28 stephenfin done
13:55:31 bauzas thanks
13:56:31 gibi will check soon
13:56:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Removed the host FQDN from the exception message https://review.opendev.org/749613
14:00:58 bauzas gibi: I saw you already looked at https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1884217
14:00:58 openstack Launchpad bug 1884217 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Nova informs Placement too early upon Ironic instance deletion" [Undecided,New]
14:01:12 bauzas gibi: this one seems legit to me but the bugfix isn't easy
14:16:12 lyarwood gibi: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1888237 - shouldn't this be moved to fix released btw?
14:16:12 openstack Launchpad bug 1888237 in Ubuntu "nova-next job fails as novnc service fails with TypeError: _wrap_socket() argument 1 must be _socket.socket, not GreenSSLSocket" [Undecided,New]
14:28:22 openstackgerrit Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Removed the host FQDN from the exception message https://review.opendev.org/752477
14:30:53 gibi bauzas: I've just tagged https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1884217 I don't know the way forward with it
14:30:53 openstack Launchpad bug 1884217 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Nova informs Placement too early upon Ironic instance deletion" [Low,Incomplete]
14:31:59 gibi lyarwood: you are correct. Now I marked it such
14:32:20 lyarwood gibi: coolio :)
14:32:33 gibi thanks for noticing
14:32:45 gibi bauzas: so if you have ideas how to fix please comment to the bug
14:33:02 gibi nvm
14:33:07 gibi I see your comment now
14:44:41 stephenfin elod, lyarwood, melwitt: Obviously the top few of these are still blocked by their Ussuri equivalents, but could you add https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bug/1879878+status:open+branch:stable/train to your review queues?
14:46:23 lyarwood ack
14:51:47 elod stephenfin: sure, will do
14:53:56 stephenfin thanks
14:57:23 elod stephenfin: btw, can those heavy test refactors be avoided somehow?
14:58:15 stephenfin elod: Do you mean the first three patches I brought into the series or the changes I made to later patches?
14:59:52 elod stephenfin: for example this one: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/I33d8ac0a1cae0b2d275a21287d5e44c008a68122
15:00:17 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Add regression test for bug #1895696 https://review.opendev.org/752485
15:00:17 openstack bug 1895696 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "unable to boot instance from encrypted volume created from a glance image of an encrypted volume" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1895696 - Assigned to Lee Yarwood (lyarwood)
15:00:18 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: compute: Skip cinder_encryption_key_id check when booting from volume https://review.opendev.org/752486
15:01:02 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Add regression test for bug #1895696 https://review.opendev.org/752487
15:01:04 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Create volume attachment during boot from volume in compute https://review.opendev.org/752488
15:01:04 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: compute: Skip cinder_encryption_key_id check when booting from volume https://review.opendev.org/752489
15:01:09 stephenfin elod: So the former. I could, but it would involve even more significant rewriting of the tests I'm bringing back plus significant rewrite of any future tests that depend on this feature
15:01:15 lyarwood stephenfin: ^ as requested
15:01:19 stephenfin lyarwood: thanks
15:02:06 stephenfin elod: Given they're test-only (low risk) and avoid merge conflicts for this series and potentially many more tests in the future, I'm personally inclined to think they belong here.
15:06:52 elod stephenfin: the test-only part is good, but still it would mean larger and larger extra refactor (due to conflicts) in older branches which could cause more problems later on maybe
15:08:16 stephenfin elod: Fair point but tbh I'm not sure how much further back we should go. Those tests and the changes themselves are invasive enough that I think they may have to be rewritten if I want to go significantly further back
15:10:36 stephenfin elod: In fact, I don't think we need to go further back. The main issue here was introduced by https://review.opendev.org/#/c/641806/ which was never backported
15:10:46 stephenfin and was merged in train
15:11:39 elod stephenfin: yes, that is another question, how far should a backport go. in general, whether a bugfix worth the backporting effort if it involves so much refactor, hence risks
15:12:23 elod stephenfin: but i understand you are saying this won't go further than train
15:13:19 stephenfin given the nasty side-effects of this race (worst case scenario: doubly pinned instances) I think bringing it back to train makes sense
15:24:09 elod stephenfin: ok, i accept it. (I won't say i'm happy with it, but i understand your point o:))
15:28:13 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Create volume attachment during boot from volume in compute https://review.opendev.org/752488
15:28:14 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/train: compute: Skip cinder_encryption_key_id check when booting from volume https://review.opendev.org/752489
15:37:01 sean-k-mooney gibi: have you see error in the fucntional test that look like ValueError: Malformed PCI address 0000:00:03
15:37:28 sean-k-mooney gibi: your new sriov attach detach test are failing for me when i rebase one of my patches
15:37:43 sean-k-mooney but the code im chanign i dont think should cause that
15:38:40 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: I haven't, but I know those fixtures well enough that I could debug. What test?
15:38:45 stephenfin *what patch?
15:38:54 sean-k-mooney http://paste.openstack.org/show/798018/
15:39:21 sean-k-mooney nova.tests.functional.libvirt.test_pci_sriov_servers.SRIOVAttachDetachTest.test_detach_macvtap
15:39:36 sean-k-mooney and nova.tests.functional.libvirt.test_pci_sriov_servers.SRIOVAttachDetachTest.test_detach_attach_direct
15:40:35 sean-k-mooney im cherry picking https://review.opendev.org/#/c/602432/16 onto another patch but after the rebase on master those new test are failing for me
15:40:59 sean-k-mooney i could just push what i have it might be simpler to look at
15:41:48 gibi sean-k-mooney: yes please ^^
15:41:52 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reject HW_CPU_HYPERTHREADING trait in named groups https://review.opendev.org/735947
15:41:58 gibi sean-k-mooney: I did not remember seeing such
15:42:00 gibi err
15:43:27 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: this is a guess but https://review.opendev.org/#/c/602432/16/nova/tests/unit/virt/libvirt/fakelibvirt.py
15:46:53 sean-k-mooney ya i guess that could be it ill take a look
15:47:02 sean-k-mooney i made fucn be octal
15:47:13 sean-k-mooney func = 0o0
15:47:23 sean-k-mooney but ya it could be the formating
15:48:10 stephenfin >>> x = 0o1
15:48:10 stephenfin >>> '%s' % x
15:48:10 stephenfin '1'
15:48:35 sean-k-mooney ok ya so that is proably it
15:49:21 sean-k-mooney cool now i need to look up hex/octal format codes :)
15:50:17 sean-k-mooney so it shoudl be o not s
15:50:36 sean-k-mooney or i guess x would work too for hex
15:52:10 gibi the nova weekly meeting starts in 8 minutes in #openstack-meetings-3
15:52:25 gibi I mean #openstack-meeting-3

Earlier   Later