Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-05-14
09:43:07 bauzas they were asking me for teaching only for 1 hour
09:43:30 bauzas now, it's 9am-11.30am and then 1.30pm-4.30pm
09:43:39 bauzas :(
09:53:01 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: cyborg evacuate support https://review.opendev.org/715326
09:55:27 sean-k-mooney gibi: brinzhang_ filed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cyborg-rebuild-and-evacuate
09:56:09 sean-k-mooney ill add it to the meeting adgenda but im hoping we are all fine with proceeding with that as a specless blueprint since i have already implemented it
09:57:09 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks
09:58:55 sean-k-mooney bauzas: im going to update the numa in placmenet spec for the victoria templeate and resubmit it now. that ok with you?
09:59:34 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney: got it, thanks, I will register suspend/resume and shelve/unshelve as the same rebuild/evacuate
10:00:11 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney, gibi: and there is also another blueprint need to be done, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/define-cyborg-arq-binding-notification-event
10:01:09 gibi stephenfin: do you mean merging https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727898/ is not needed if we merging https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727898/ and doing a version bump?
10:01:13 brinzhang_ I write poc code, but there is not time to add UT, when I have free time, I will summit a WIP patch for this
10:01:45 gibi stephenfin: I mean merging your patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727992/
10:03:58 gibi brinzhang_: could you write one sentence in that bp about what you need implemented?
10:04:50 brinzhang_ gibi: ok
10:04:53 gibi thanks
10:07:37 stephenfin gibi: Yeah, exactly
10:08:29 gibi stephenfin: if we can merge that quickly then I'm OK to wait for the better solution
10:09:06 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: re-propose numa with placement https://review.opendev.org/728009
10:09:42 brinzhang_ gibi: I modified https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/define-cyborg-arq-binding-notification-event description in simple, is it ok?
10:11:35 gibi brinzhang_: what you have to add regarding "accelerators binding notifications." ?
10:11:44 gibi what you have to add to nova
10:12:41 sean-k-mooney gmann: when you have time could you weigh in on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/702394/ i think it likely should have a specless blueprint or a spec since its technicall changing api behavior by cause the event api to force refresh the netwrok info cache. that is an internal detail however so im not sure it should have a micro version bump as form a normal user perspecitive that should not be visable
10:12:43 sean-k-mooney but it would be good to get your input.
10:16:18 brinzhang_ gibi: updated, I think it's the clear I can write in
10:16:36 brinzhang_ stephenfin: what do you think of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727589/ ?
10:17:16 brinzhang_ I saw you were abandoned https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727140/, would you like to continue that patch?
10:18:23 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Allow snapshots to be created from PAUSED volume backed instances https://review.opendev.org/728011
10:18:23 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Remove snapshot quiesce tests for STOPPED and SUSPENDED instances https://review.opendev.org/728012
10:18:47 lyarwood ^ simple fix if anyone has time
10:18:50 stephenfin brinzhang_: hacking 3.1.0 will bump the version of flake8 supported so it would probably make more sense to wait for that to be released
10:20:13 stephenfin brinzhang_: I'm okay for you to take over that work
10:20:16 brinzhang_ yeah, I know, I mean do we need to correct these code style, after we bump hacking>=3.0.1
10:21:02 gibi brinzhang_: I'm still confused. Nova does not have versioned notification for neutron port binding during nova server create. So I don't see why nova would emit versioned notifications for ARQ binding
10:21:31 brinzhang_ stephenfin: thanks, I want to say when I submit this patch, I have not check your patch
10:23:12 brinzhang_ gibi: this Blueprint comes from https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1865549, when I saw this bug, I just only think define-cyborg-arq-binding-notification-event is what I should do, or I missed something?
10:23:12 openstack Launchpad bug 1865549 in OpenStack Compute (nova) " Define Cyborg ARQ binding notification event." [Wishlist,Confirmed] - Assigned to Brin Zhang (zhangbailin)
10:23:44 brinzhang_ OTW, this is an invalid bug?
10:23:45 gibi brinzhang_: this is a doc bug
10:24:05 stephenfin brinzhang_: all good :)
10:24:13 gibi generated automatically due to DocImpact in the commit message
10:24:31 gibi so the question is what doc needs to be updated due to https://review.opendev.org/692707
10:26:02 brinzhang_ gibi: that should do DocImpact: Adds new version to doc/api_samples/versions/. ?
10:27:46 gibi as far as I see that patch itself added such doc change
10:27:53 brinzhang_ stephenfin: thanks ^
10:27:53 brinzhang_ gibi:I am sorry, I am confusing..
10:28:17 gibi so I think that bug is Invalid we don't need to change anything due to taht
10:28:33 brinzhang_ yeah, I think so.
10:28:53 gibi bauzas: do you agree that bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1865549 is invalid? ^^
10:28:53 openstack Launchpad bug 1865549 in OpenStack Compute (nova) " Define Cyborg ARQ binding notification event." [Wishlist,Confirmed] - Assigned to Brin Zhang (zhangbailin)
10:28:56 brinzhang_ thanks gibi.
10:38:59 brinzhang_ stephenfin: your comment hacking version is 3.1.0, you mean 3.0.1, right?
10:39:27 stephenfin no, 3.1.0, which isn't released yet (I've proposed the release though)
10:40:52 brinzhang_ stephenfin: I saw gmann submit 3.0.1 to many project, if the 3.1.0 released, that has need to be changed again?
10:41:14 brinzhang_ I will update your comments after 3.1.0 released ^
10:41:51 stephenfin yes and no. The 3.0.1 bump is necessary to ensure the correct version flake8 is installed. The 3.1.0 bump should be done but it wouldn't be as urgent
10:43:22 brinzhang_ ok, thank for your explain
10:56:55 openstackgerrit Harshavardhan Metla proposed openstack/nova master: [Nova] Add reference to Placement installation guide https://review.opendev.org/726936
10:57:38 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Add ARQs binding notification https://review.opendev.org/728027
11:36:40 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: update tox envs and support pdf docs https://review.opendev.org/728037
11:37:39 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: by the way wasnt pdf docs a goal at some point.
11:45:08 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for bug 1550919 https://review.opendev.org/631294
11:45:08 openstack bug 1550919 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "[Libvirt]Evacuate fail may cause disk image be deleted" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1550919 - Assigned to Lee Yarwood (lyarwood)
11:45:08 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Don't delete disks on shared storage during evacuate https://review.opendev.org/578846
11:57:12 jsuchome lyarwood: Hi. Shouldn't https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727225/ be rebuilt automatically when I pushed new changes to the depends-on patch?
12:00:03 sean-k-mooney jsuchome: no
12:00:11 sean-k-mooney you have to manually recheck
12:01:01 sean-k-mooney jsuchome: just leave a "recheck" comment on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727225/ and it will run again
12:06:44 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Silence amqp heartbeat warning https://review.opendev.org/728054
12:08:03 bauzas sean-k-mooney: sure, either you or me can repropose the spec, but let's do it
12:08:07 bauzas if you want
12:08:19 sean-k-mooney bauzas: i did it while you were away
12:08:19 bauzas gibi: looking
12:08:31 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/#/c/728009/
12:08:56 bauzas sean-k-mooney: ack, clicking
12:10:38 bauzas gibi: I triaged it as wishlist
12:10:53 bauzas gibi: it's a doc thingies, right?
12:10:58 bauzas https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1865549
12:10:58 openstack Launchpad bug 1865549 in OpenStack Compute (nova) " Define Cyborg ARQ binding notification event." [Wishlist,Confirmed] - Assigned to Brin Zhang (zhangbailin)
12:11:30 gibi bauzas: it seems to me that that the original patch added DocImpact tag in the commit message, and that triggered the bug creation automaticaly. But as far as I see the original patch did the documentation
12:11:48 bauzas gibi: oh my bad then, I haven't looked at the doc
12:11:54 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: remove support of oslo.messaging 9.8.0 warning message https://review.opendev.org/728055
12:11:56 bauzas gibi: feel free to close it then
12:12:22 gibi bauzas: thanks. closing it
12:13:15 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: remove support of oslo.messaging 9.8.0 warning message https://review.opendev.org/728055
12:15:54 jsuchome sean-k-mooney: ok thanks (still don't know why it is failing, let's see if it behaves differently with new patch)
12:18:33 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Silence amqp heartbeat warning https://review.opendev.org/728057
12:18:34 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/train: remove support of oslo.messaging 9.8.0 warning message https://review.opendev.org/728058
12:20:33 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: Silence amqp heartbeat warning https://review.opendev.org/728059
12:21:56 sean-k-mooney jsuchome: test_volume_crud_with_volume_type_and_extra_specs is what failed but that seams unrelated to your change
12:24:27 lyarwood jsuchome / sean-k-mooney ; yeah that was unrelated but I didn't see any DEBUG lines from your change in n-cpu FWIW
12:24:51 lyarwood jsuchome: I'll play around with things on a local env after a call
12:26:14 openstackgerrit Ivaylo Mitev proposed openstack/nova master: Faults from cell DB missing in GET /servers/detail https://review.opendev.org/699176
12:27:15 jsuchome lyarwood: yeah, i did not seem them either ... it actually should be INFO line ("Successfully transferred using")...
12:27:58 jsuchome I would also be surprised if that volume test were related...
12:28:04 bauzas sean-k-mooney: fwiw, changed the topic name of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/728009/ since there was a typo
12:28:16 bauzas (just in case you need to update the change)
12:28:45 sean-k-mooney no worries i use git review to download my patches before i update them
12:29:04 sean-k-mooney i ussuall keep the local patch too but it should preserve the topic
12:31:17 sean-k-mooney bauzas: i have a few small bugfixes im planning to rebase but ill proably start creating a poc of the numa change on monday or tuesday

Earlier   Later