| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-05-13 | |||
| 23:41:56 | melwitt | ah, good luck :) | |
| #openstack-nova - 2020-05-14 | |||
| 00:46:44 | openstackgerrit | Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/719163 | |
| 00:49:25 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Configure latex_engine = 'xelatex' for pdf docs build https://review.opendev.org/727898 | |
| 01:07:14 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Configure latex_engine = 'xelatex' for pdf docs build https://review.opendev.org/727898 | |
| 01:32:15 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose provider-config-file spec for Victoria https://review.opendev.org/725788 | |
| 01:36:51 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-proposes 'Proposal for a safer remote console with password authentication' https://review.opendev.org/719720 | |
| 02:48:28 | tony_su | gibi, sean-k-mooney : Thanks for reviewing and merging the spec. | |
| 02:50:43 | tony_su | gibi, sean-k-mooney : I will start to rebase related patches and send out for code review once they are ready. | |
| 03:03:55 | melwitt | fyi the openstack-tox-docs job is failing for nova since a recent upper-constraints bump, I have proposed a fix here https://review.opendev.org/727898 I have also sent a ML post | |
| 05:56:38 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Configure latex_engine = 'xelatex' for pdf docs build https://review.opendev.org/727898 | |
| 07:10:38 | openstackgerrit | Nalini Varshney proposed openstack/nova master: Add migration to make key field type VARBINARY in aggregate_metadata table, https://review.opendev.org/725522 | |
| 07:35:02 | brinzhang_ | sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727589/2 do I need to update this patch? I have not concern stephenfin has already fixed these issue, but he abandoned. | |
| 07:49:09 | gibi | good morning Nova | |
| 07:49:29 | bauzas | whoops my manners | |
| 07:49:34 | bauzas | good morning Nova | |
| 07:50:26 | brinzhang_ | morning nova | |
| 07:50:59 | brinzhang_ | hi gibi, bauzas, I saw you are -1 for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727140/1, the flake8 error fix patch | |
| 07:51:44 | gibi | brinzhang_: my -1 is about the fact that 3.8.1 added yet another check that needs to be fixed | |
| 07:51:48 | brinzhang_ | I submit a same one, before that I have not concern stephenfin's patch, do I need to continue ? | |
| 07:52:24 | brinzhang_ | gibi: I will see http://paste.openstack.org/show/793434/ | |
| 07:52:40 | bauzas | brinzhang_: my concerns was about making sure what we would need to change | |
| 07:52:49 | gibi | I guess stephenfin abandoned the patch as we went a different direction, capping the version | |
| 07:53:34 | brinzhang_ | yeah | |
| 07:53:55 | brinzhang_ | I mean, if there is no sense to fix, I think I would abandon too. | |
| 07:56:16 | brinzhang_ | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727347/ gmann bumped hacking to 3.0.1, I am not sure whether this can avoid these pep8 error happen again | |
| 07:58:30 | brinzhang_ | gibi: stephenfin and I fixed the issue is reported by https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724260/6, and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/726564/2. | |
| 07:59:12 | brinzhang_ | I found your paste is not easy to fix, may need to change the function name, such as "./nova/tests/unit/api/openstack/compute/microversions.py:34:5: F811 redefinition of unused 'index' from line 29" | |
| 07:59:18 | brinzhang_ | :P | |
| 08:02:05 | gibi | brinzhang_: those redefinitions are intentional and not cause a python bug due to the decorator top of it will generate unique functions dynamically. So I think F811 needs to be ignored in tox.ini | |
| 08:03:01 | gibi | I think it is OK to fix the issues reported by the other new checks along with version bump | |
| 08:03:09 | gibi | but please consult stephenfin too | |
| 08:03:54 | brinzhang_ | gibi: agree | |
| 08:04:49 | brinzhang_ | gibi: yeah, I will try to update the patch to latest, and then consult | |
| 08:05:32 | gibi | OK, cool | |
| 08:20:58 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Fix flake8 error from hacking <3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727589 | |
| 08:45:27 | bauzas | brinzhang_: gibi: FWIW, +Wd https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727347/1 | |
| 08:45:57 | bauzas | brinzhang_: but then I don't understand why we should merge https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727589/ | |
| 08:46:04 | gibi | bauzas: thanks | |
| 08:50:36 | bauzas | gibi: any change I should be reviewing ? | |
| 08:51:23 | gibi | bauzas: not from me at the moment. I still busy with https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1878024 | |
| 08:51:23 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1878024 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "disk usage of the nova image cache is not counted as used disk space" [Undecided,Confirmed] - Assigned to Balazs Gibizer (balazs-gibizer) | |
| 08:51:41 | bauzas | gibi: okay, just saying, you have https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bug/1869050+(status:open+OR+status:merged) | |
| 08:51:51 | bauzas | should I look at it ? | |
| 08:52:13 | gibi | bauzas: yes please. I already forgot about that | |
| 08:52:23 | bauzas | heh, no worries | |
| 09:00:45 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727589/ this patch just only fixed some unreasonable issue, IMO, if we don’t fix it, we don’t know when it will *explode* | |
| 09:01:08 | brinzhang_ | after all, it has reported in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724260/6, and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/726564/2. | |
| 09:11:09 | bauzas | brinzhang_: that's the exact reason why we have minimum versions | |
| 09:11:41 | bauzas | once we bump the minimum, we no longer need to care about what was bad for older versions | |
| 09:12:23 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: I know you mean, but these code realy not have a good code style, right? | |
| 09:13:41 | brinzhang_ | I can say with certainty that merged this change will only make Nova's code more readable. | |
| 09:14:37 | bauzas | then that's not a bugfix | |
| 09:14:42 | brinzhang_ | especially https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727589/3/nova/tests/unit/compute/test_compute_mgr.py this patch | |
| 09:14:49 | brinzhang_ | s/patch/file/ | |
| 09:14:57 | bauzas | and just a bikeshed | |
| 09:15:23 | brinzhang_ | if there is no this blank line, it.. | |
| 09:16:09 | brinzhang_ | Yes, this bug was submitted before https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727347/1 | |
| 09:16:58 | brinzhang_ | because it caused pep8 error in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724260/6, and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/726564/2. | |
| 09:17:26 | brinzhang_ | that time I think it is a bug, that why report | |
| 09:19:18 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: we will eventually have to fix the pep8 issues by the way when we update hacking | |
| 09:19:36 | sean-k-mooney | and therefor get the newer flake8 | |
| 09:20:02 | bauzas | again, we have minimum versions FTW | |
| 09:20:16 | sean-k-mooney | yep wont help | |
| 09:20:43 | bauzas | the point is, if we want to support new flake8 version, then yes indeed we need to verify this works | |
| 09:20:46 | sean-k-mooney | the new min version of hacking is so we get a version that caps flake8 and we have capped the hacking version | |
| 09:20:50 | bauzas | and then updating what we need | |
| 09:21:07 | sean-k-mooney | so when we update the hacking version we will get a new flake8 and have to fix the issue then | |
| 09:21:09 | bauzas | but that's another concern | |
| 09:21:22 | bauzas | correct, that's another change | |
| 09:21:39 | bauzas | anyway, /me needs to get my kid from the school since it opened again today :( | |
| 09:22:00 | bauzas | (until next kids vacations) | |
| 09:22:12 | sean-k-mooney | i would have assumed your productivig increased with them going back to school | |
| 09:22:31 | sean-k-mooney | so in net it should still be better | |
| 09:23:03 | sean-k-mooney | even if its about to go down now that you are going to pick them up | |
| 09:25:17 | brinzhang_ | Agree, a good foundation can make a difference. | |
| 09:42:32 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: hell, unfortunately no | |
| 09:42:48 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I was working between 9am-1pm and then 2pm-7.30pm | |
| 09:42:55 | bauzas | even with the kids | |
| 09:43:07 | bauzas | they were asking me for teaching only for 1 hour | |
| 09:43:30 | bauzas | now, it's 9am-11.30am and then 1.30pm-4.30pm | |
| 09:43:39 | bauzas | :( | |
| 09:53:01 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: cyborg evacuate support https://review.opendev.org/715326 | |
| 09:55:27 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: brinzhang_ filed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cyborg-rebuild-and-evacuate | |
| 09:56:09 | sean-k-mooney | ill add it to the meeting adgenda but im hoping we are all fine with proceeding with that as a specless blueprint since i have already implemented it | |
| 09:57:09 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: thanks | |
| 09:58:55 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: im going to update the numa in placmenet spec for the victoria templeate and resubmit it now. that ok with you? | |
| 09:59:34 | brinzhang_ | sean-k-mooney: got it, thanks, I will register suspend/resume and shelve/unshelve as the same rebuild/evacuate | |
| 10:00:11 | brinzhang_ | sean-k-mooney, gibi: and there is also another blueprint need to be done, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/define-cyborg-arq-binding-notification-event | |
| 10:01:09 | gibi | stephenfin: do you mean merging https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727898/ is not needed if we merging https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727898/ and doing a version bump? | |
| 10:01:13 | brinzhang_ | I write poc code, but there is not time to add UT, when I have free time, I will summit a WIP patch for this | |
| 10:01:45 | gibi | stephenfin: I mean merging your patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727992/ | |
| 10:03:58 | gibi | brinzhang_: could you write one sentence in that bp about what you need implemented? | |
| 10:04:50 | brinzhang_ | gibi: ok | |
| 10:04:53 | gibi | thanks | |
| 10:07:37 | stephenfin | gibi: Yeah, exactly | |
| 10:08:29 | gibi | stephenfin: if we can merge that quickly then I'm OK to wait for the better solution | |
| 10:09:06 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: re-propose numa with placement https://review.opendev.org/728009 | |
| 10:09:42 | brinzhang_ | gibi: I modified https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/define-cyborg-arq-binding-notification-event description in simple, is it ok? | |
| 10:11:35 | gibi | brinzhang_: what you have to add regarding "accelerators binding notifications." ? | |
| 10:11:44 | gibi | what you have to add to nova | |