Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-05-12
18:54:43 gmann let me check job timeout for that
18:54:54 melwitt yeah... I just don't get how my backport could cause this and only cause it on queens? confused
18:55:20 melwitt it got through rocky, stein, train without issue
19:00:25 elod melwitt: when those got merged there weren't stable/ussuri yet, were there?
19:00:46 elod this shows some master fails too: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=build-openstack-releasenotes&project=openstack/nova
19:01:13 melwitt elod: no there wasn't, was merged before branching
19:01:56 melwitt oh you mean the stable merges. let me check
19:03:19 melwitt train change merged on Apr 18 and I assume stable/ussuri was cut on Apr 24
19:03:21 gmann reno job timeout is 60 min which should be well enough https://github.com/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/blob/13ef0adb415e6296fe5c73d9ff9d1ca557843c54/zuul.d/jobs.yaml#L638
19:03:37 melwitt stein change merged on Apr 24
19:03:55 melwitt rocky change merged on May 11
19:06:19 melwitt the rocky change build does _not_ show processing of stable/ussuri notes https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/bd1684e2f6d4460a985d822dfe773b81/log/job-output.txt#580-583
19:06:58 melwitt whereas the failing queens change build _does_ show processing of stable/ussuri notes https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/e63085cb0ebf4e0ea8d91e07c94557ae/log/job-output.txt#536-542 so I think elod is right
19:15:23 gmann melwitt: elod it seems job most of time run on the edge time when it pass. >50 for master reno also and 59m 52s in case of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/725146/
19:16:26 melwitt gmann: livin on the edge. I'm wondering the obvious question, is there a nice way we could run the job for only the relevant branches to the branch it's running on? eventually we're gonna have too many reno branches and job will take longer and longer
19:17:20 gmann melwitt: you mean only build the reno for proposed branch ?
19:17:51 melwitt gmann: something like that yeah. or some other way to avoid wasting resource on building irrelevant renos
19:18:05 melwitt just thinking out loud
19:19:43 melwitt we could increase the job timeout obvs but aside from that I'm wondering about future when we have more and more reno branches
19:25:45 gmann melwitt: yeah, i remember we were facing same issue on tempest which has 10-15 releases notes bt might be less than nova. it was long back ago so cannot remember is indexing or per release directory fixed that
19:27:33 melwitt ah... looks like nova has "only" 11, liberty-ussuri + unreleased
19:29:33 gmann may be doug can help with some trick, he is not here but we can find him on openstack-dev
19:38:17 melwitt ok, I just sent him a question over there
19:38:41 melwitt thanks for suggesting
20:02:38 gmann melwitt: along with the parallel run option, i think we can remove all these < newton-eol reno? anyways those will be present in older tag- https://github.com/openstack/nova/tree/newton-eol/releasenotes/notes
20:06:39 melwitt gmann: oh you mean treat them as static? yeah I would think so. but keep in mind I don't understand this super well so I might be misunderstanding what you're saying :P
20:08:10 gmann melwitt: i was thinking to remove as not sure how to make them static. but removing will remoev those from this site too which is issue or might be ok - https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/nova
20:08:35 melwitt oh, yeah I wouldn't want to remove them from the site
20:10:18 melwitt personally I'm leaning toward the parallel idea because that would be easier. but yes it's unreleased. I wonder if we could use LIBS_FROM_GIT to do it in the meantime
20:11:00 melwitt and also note that sean said he tried making old stuff static but it didn't help bc most of the time looked to be spent in a rst => html conversion
20:11:10 melwitt (I had to re-read it to pick that out)
20:12:59 gmann melwitt: LIBS_FROM_GIT or required_project need job update but this should also work, as devstack should checkout the depends-on Depends-On: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724666/
20:14:56 melwitt gmann: for a temporary test yes but not for mergeable fix right?
20:16:49 smcginnis The suggestion for making those older branches static would be to call reno to emit the generated straight rst and use that to replace the current page that has the reno sphinx directive. That way it only needs to convert rst to HTML, and not have to generate the rst via the reno directive first.
20:17:08 smcginnis That should save a little time, even if there were not a lot of release notes in those older series.
20:17:17 gmann melwitt: yeah, for mergeable fix if that improves we can ask for new reno release. if we do LIBS_FROM_GIT it might need more testing on reno master gate.
20:17:36 melwitt gmann: yeah good point
20:21:01 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Try out running sphinx-build in parallel for releasenotes https://review.opendev.org/727429
21:02:47 melwitt guh, 205 changes in the gate ...
21:04:39 gmann yeah, pep8 fixing-try also stuck for long time
21:53:46 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Try out running sphinx-build in parallel for releasenotes https://review.opendev.org/727429
23:13:04 openstackgerrit Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Remove six.moves https://review.opendev.org/727224
23:56:33 openstackgerrit Tony Su proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose provider-config-file spec for Victoria https://review.opendev.org/725788
#openstack-nova - 2020-05-13
00:06:51 tony_su gibi: Thanks for your review. I have changed 'Feature liasison' person from efried to gibi and uploaded the new patch 3. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/725788
01:21:32 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/os-resource-classes master: Fix hacking min version to 3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727557
01:21:37 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/os-traits master: Fix hacking min version to 3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727559
01:31:50 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/727560
02:22:09 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Fix flake8 error from hacking <3.0.1x https://review.opendev.org/727589
02:24:22 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Bump hacking min version to 3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727214
02:27:53 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/719163
02:27:53 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/727560
02:36:54 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Fix flake8 error from hacking <3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727589
02:59:23 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/719163
05:14:43 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: tox: Integrate mypy https://review.opendev.org/676208
05:14:43 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Update and correct typing information https://review.opendev.org/714694
05:14:44 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add typing information https://review.opendev.org/714695
05:14:44 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Split instance NUMA object tests https://review.opendev.org/714696
05:14:45 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Replace 'cpu_pinning_requested' helper https://review.opendev.org/714697
05:14:45 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Don't consider overhead CPUs for unpinned instances https://review.opendev.org/714698
05:14:46 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Remove handling of pre-Train compute nodes https://review.opendev.org/714699
05:14:46 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Add validation for 'cpu_realtime_mask' https://review.opendev.org/468203
05:14:47 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Tweak the 'cpu_realtime_mask' handling slightly https://review.opendev.org/461456
05:14:47 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Rework 'get_realtime_constraint' https://review.opendev.org/714700
05:14:48 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Invert order of NUMA topology generation https://review.opendev.org/714701
05:14:48 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Remove '_numa_fit_instance_cell_with_pinning' https://review.opendev.org/714703
06:07:11 openstackgerrit Liang Fang proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] rbd patch for volume local cache https://review.opendev.org/726762
06:12:16 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/719163
06:57:59 openstackgerrit Jiri Suchomel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for downloading images via RBD https://review.opendev.org/572805
07:13:27 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Moving functional jobs to Victoria testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/725372
07:22:43 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Try out running sphinx-build in parallel for releasenotes https://review.opendev.org/727429
07:27:11 bauzas good morning Nova
07:28:48 gibi good morning
07:51:55 tony_su c
07:52:13 tony_su clear
07:52:18 tony_su exit
07:52:21 tony_su exit
07:52:47 gibi tony_su: thanks for the spec update, I have +2d it
07:58:52 tony_su gibi: got it and will go to next step. Thanks gibi.
08:29:37 gibi sean-k-mooney, dansmith: read back your discussion about the pre-filter. Good idea. Would that be backportable solution?
08:30:15 gibi sean-k-mooney, dansmith: also I replied in the patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727261 and will continue investigating turning off the cache today
08:37:08 brinzhang_ gibi: this re-propose spec comes from U release https://review.opendev.org/#/c/719720/, hope you can review again
08:40:50 openstackgerrit Nalini Varshney proposed openstack/nova master: Add migration to make key field type VARBINARY in aggregate_metadata table, https://review.opendev.org/725522
08:43:59 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Delete ARQs by UUID if Cyborg ARQ bind fails. https://review.opendev.org/716186
08:59:24 sean-k-mooney gibi: we only have prefilters back to rocky
08:59:55 sean-k-mooney gibi: i guess we could backport it that far back.
09:00:23 sean-k-mooney normlaly i a prefilter would be a feature but in this case its a bug so if the stable team is ok with it maybe
09:03:23 sean-k-mooney gibi: the prefilter would result in us over allocating the storage so we also need to srink the allocation on the compute node
09:07:10 sean-k-mooney that said we still need to be careful for rolling updates
09:20:22 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Delete ARQs by UUID if Cyborg ARQ bind fails. https://review.opendev.org/716186
10:00:37 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for bug 1550919 https://review.opendev.org/631294
10:00:37 openstack bug 1550919 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "[Libvirt]Evacuate fail may cause disk image be deleted" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1550919 - Assigned to Lee Yarwood (lyarwood)
10:00:37 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Don't delete disks on shared storage during evacuate https://review.opendev.org/578846
10:01:00 lyarwood stephenfin: ^ blast from the past, you were pretty happy with this a while ago if you have anytime today to take another look?
10:01:49 stephenfin Sure. I've my head stuck into something rn though so it might be tomorrow
10:02:15 lyarwood ack np
10:34:38 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Delete ARQs by UUID if Cyborg ARQ bind fails. https://review.opendev.org/716186
10:34:39 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: cyborg evacuate support https://review.opendev.org/715326
10:46:40 sean-k-mooney gibi: procedual question for you. do i need to file a spec for ^ or a blueprint?
10:47:27 sean-k-mooney gibi: the first patch is clearly a bug but i likely wont have time to complete all the other move operation for cyborg this cycle at least not unless we finish the numa in placment work before m1 or m2
10:47:58 sean-k-mooney gibi: so i would like to get rebuild/evacuate merged but not sure ill get much more done in the near term

Earlier   Later