Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-05-12
20:11:10 melwitt (I had to re-read it to pick that out)
20:12:59 gmann melwitt: LIBS_FROM_GIT or required_project need job update but this should also work, as devstack should checkout the depends-on Depends-On: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724666/
20:14:56 melwitt gmann: for a temporary test yes but not for mergeable fix right?
20:16:49 smcginnis The suggestion for making those older branches static would be to call reno to emit the generated straight rst and use that to replace the current page that has the reno sphinx directive. That way it only needs to convert rst to HTML, and not have to generate the rst via the reno directive first.
20:17:08 smcginnis That should save a little time, even if there were not a lot of release notes in those older series.
20:17:17 gmann melwitt: yeah, for mergeable fix if that improves we can ask for new reno release. if we do LIBS_FROM_GIT it might need more testing on reno master gate.
20:17:36 melwitt gmann: yeah good point
20:21:01 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Try out running sphinx-build in parallel for releasenotes https://review.opendev.org/727429
21:02:47 melwitt guh, 205 changes in the gate ...
21:04:39 gmann yeah, pep8 fixing-try also stuck for long time
21:53:46 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Try out running sphinx-build in parallel for releasenotes https://review.opendev.org/727429
23:13:04 openstackgerrit Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Remove six.moves https://review.opendev.org/727224
23:56:33 openstackgerrit Tony Su proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose provider-config-file spec for Victoria https://review.opendev.org/725788
#openstack-nova - 2020-05-13
00:06:51 tony_su gibi: Thanks for your review. I have changed 'Feature liasison' person from efried to gibi and uploaded the new patch 3. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/725788
01:21:32 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/os-resource-classes master: Fix hacking min version to 3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727557
01:21:37 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/os-traits master: Fix hacking min version to 3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727559
01:31:50 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/727560
02:22:09 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Fix flake8 error from hacking <3.0.1x https://review.opendev.org/727589
02:24:22 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Bump hacking min version to 3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727214
02:27:53 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/719163
02:27:53 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/727560
02:36:54 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Fix flake8 error from hacking <3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727589
02:59:23 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/719163
05:14:43 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: tox: Integrate mypy https://review.opendev.org/676208
05:14:43 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Update and correct typing information https://review.opendev.org/714694
05:14:44 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add typing information https://review.opendev.org/714695
05:14:44 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Split instance NUMA object tests https://review.opendev.org/714696
05:14:45 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: objects: Replace 'cpu_pinning_requested' helper https://review.opendev.org/714697
05:14:45 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Don't consider overhead CPUs for unpinned instances https://review.opendev.org/714698
05:14:46 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Remove handling of pre-Train compute nodes https://review.opendev.org/714699
05:14:46 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Add validation for 'cpu_realtime_mask' https://review.opendev.org/468203
05:14:47 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Tweak the 'cpu_realtime_mask' handling slightly https://review.opendev.org/461456
05:14:47 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Rework 'get_realtime_constraint' https://review.opendev.org/714700
05:14:48 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Invert order of NUMA topology generation https://review.opendev.org/714701
05:14:48 openstackgerrit Huaqiang Wang proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Remove '_numa_fit_instance_cell_with_pinning' https://review.opendev.org/714703
06:07:11 openstackgerrit Liang Fang proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] rbd patch for volume local cache https://review.opendev.org/726762
06:12:16 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/719163
06:57:59 openstackgerrit Jiri Suchomel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for downloading images via RBD https://review.opendev.org/572805
07:13:27 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Moving functional jobs to Victoria testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/725372
07:22:43 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM Try out running sphinx-build in parallel for releasenotes https://review.opendev.org/727429
07:27:11 bauzas good morning Nova
07:28:48 gibi good morning
07:51:55 tony_su c
07:52:13 tony_su clear
07:52:18 tony_su exit
07:52:21 tony_su exit
07:52:47 gibi tony_su: thanks for the spec update, I have +2d it
07:58:52 tony_su gibi: got it and will go to next step. Thanks gibi.
08:29:37 gibi sean-k-mooney, dansmith: read back your discussion about the pre-filter. Good idea. Would that be backportable solution?
08:30:15 gibi sean-k-mooney, dansmith: also I replied in the patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727261 and will continue investigating turning off the cache today
08:37:08 brinzhang_ gibi: this re-propose spec comes from U release https://review.opendev.org/#/c/719720/, hope you can review again
08:40:50 openstackgerrit Nalini Varshney proposed openstack/nova master: Add migration to make key field type VARBINARY in aggregate_metadata table, https://review.opendev.org/725522
08:43:59 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Delete ARQs by UUID if Cyborg ARQ bind fails. https://review.opendev.org/716186
08:59:24 sean-k-mooney gibi: we only have prefilters back to rocky
08:59:55 sean-k-mooney gibi: i guess we could backport it that far back.
09:00:23 sean-k-mooney normlaly i a prefilter would be a feature but in this case its a bug so if the stable team is ok with it maybe
09:03:23 sean-k-mooney gibi: the prefilter would result in us over allocating the storage so we also need to srink the allocation on the compute node
09:07:10 sean-k-mooney that said we still need to be careful for rolling updates
09:20:22 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Delete ARQs by UUID if Cyborg ARQ bind fails. https://review.opendev.org/716186
10:00:37 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for bug 1550919 https://review.opendev.org/631294
10:00:37 openstack bug 1550919 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "[Libvirt]Evacuate fail may cause disk image be deleted" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1550919 - Assigned to Lee Yarwood (lyarwood)
10:00:37 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Don't delete disks on shared storage during evacuate https://review.opendev.org/578846
10:01:00 lyarwood stephenfin: ^ blast from the past, you were pretty happy with this a while ago if you have anytime today to take another look?
10:01:49 stephenfin Sure. I've my head stuck into something rn though so it might be tomorrow
10:02:15 lyarwood ack np
10:34:38 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Delete ARQs by UUID if Cyborg ARQ bind fails. https://review.opendev.org/716186
10:34:39 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: cyborg evacuate support https://review.opendev.org/715326
10:46:40 sean-k-mooney gibi: procedual question for you. do i need to file a spec for ^ or a blueprint?
10:47:27 sean-k-mooney gibi: the first patch is clearly a bug but i likely wont have time to complete all the other move operation for cyborg this cycle at least not unless we finish the numa in placment work before m1 or m2
10:47:58 sean-k-mooney gibi: so i would like to get rebuild/evacuate merged but not sure ill get much more done in the near term
10:48:45 sean-k-mooney would you be oke tracking rebuild/evacuate via a bug or speclesss blueprint?
10:49:49 gibi sean-k-mooney: re: image cache, I will keep the pre-filter impl independent from the disable cache impl so we can decide about the backport independently
10:50:07 sean-k-mooney gibi: ya i think that makes sense
10:50:29 sean-k-mooney gibi: the disable config option is much simpler to backport but is really just a workaround
10:50:31 gibi sean-k-mooney: about cyborg + evac I think at least a bp is needed for tracking
10:50:52 sean-k-mooney gibi: ok ill file one so
10:51:11 sean-k-mooney for the provider.yaml work im going to copy paste the spec form last cycle and repopose it
10:51:28 gibi sean-k-mooney: provider yaml was re-proposed already
10:51:33 sean-k-mooney oh ok cool
10:51:49 gibi https://review.opendev.org/#/c/725788/
10:52:12 gibi I think tony_su from intel is willing to take it over
10:53:08 sean-k-mooney ok cool. the only feedback that was pending was consolidating the negitive test into a yaml file or the posityve into python so they are consistnet
10:53:49 sean-k-mooney if they can take it over then cool i can spend a little time working on it this cycle if it merges early i.e. if we can get it dont before m1
10:56:34 gibi OK
11:06:06 gibi sean-k-mooney: also it would be nice to check brinzhang_ and the cyborg team about supporting other server operations with cyborg in V. I assume they would like to continue that work so you can join forces
11:08:38 brinzhang_ gibi, sean-k-mooney: if you have some idea that you can add that in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cyborg-victoria-goals, that will be discuss in PTG
11:08:42 sean-k-mooney gibi: ya maybe. honestly i dont think its that much work to make it work. its a littel non tivaial but it can be done iteritivly
11:09:23 gibi sean-k-mooney: sure, I'm not talking about evac specially, but all the missing / unsupported server operation in general.
11:09:45 sean-k-mooney brinzhang_: well it was more just completeing the list here https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715326/10/api-guide/source/accelerator-support.rst
11:09:51 huaqiang hi, I have a question I wonder if anyone can give me some comment or deliver a conclusion directly. Does it tolerate to loose some information in a process of 'versioned_object.obj_to_primitive'? especially generating a primitive dict in a lower version number.
11:10:01 sean-k-mooney everything except for live migrate should be doable
11:11:31 sean-k-mooney gibi: ya i was originally planning to submit a patch for each of them im unst unlikely to have time to do that this cycle. that said i might work on it on and off this cycle.
11:11:53 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney, gibi: yeah, in accelerator-support.rst marked unsuport all need to be consider to support, as sean-k-mooney said except for live migrate
11:12:22 sean-k-mooney brinzhang_: suspend/resume and shelve/unshelve should be fairly simple to do
11:12:42 gibi brinzhang_: do you or the cyborg team will have bandwidth during V to work on adding support for the missing operations?
11:12:45 sean-k-mooney resize/coldmigreate needs a little more work but they are effectvly the same operation
11:13:30 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney: got it ^
11:14:21 gibi huaqiang: if you generate a lower version dict then you need to drop the fields that was not present in that lower version. So that is a necessary loss of information. Other than that I think we tend to keep the information. I think dansmith is the best person to ask
11:14:47 brinzhang_ gibi: yes, we will, during V we will open block operation asap, but we should talked in PTG,
11:15:42 gibi brinzhang_: OK. Thanks. I just wanted to make sure that you and sean-k-mooney are in sync about who does what in V

Earlier   Later