| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-04-15 | |||
| 10:57:43 | stephenfin | ick | |
| 10:58:14 | stephenfin | That's a pretty big issue. I can work on fixing that today. | |
| 10:58:33 | stephenfin | Guess we didn't spot that since we don't do PCI testing in the gate :( | |
| 10:58:38 | gibi | stephenfin: I started looking into that but got distracted (virtual PTG planning) so you can go ahead | |
| 10:58:41 | bauzas | TIL https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ick | |
| 10:59:18 | bauzas | stephenfin: I'll just throw it to you | |
| 11:00:13 | bauzas | stephenfin: that'd require some PCI grenade testing | |
| 11:00:21 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: fup: Combine SUPPORTED_DEVICE_BUS and SUPPORTED_STORAGE_BUSES https://review.opendev.org/718448 | |
| 11:00:38 | bauzas | wow, this one is an old +Wd ^ | |
| 11:01:04 | lyarwood | finally :d | |
| 11:01:27 | gibi | lyarwood: two to go :) | |
| 11:01:55 | bauzas | lyarwood: I honestly stopped looking at the gate for your series once we merged 2.87 :p | |
| 11:02:06 | bauzas | I spent the whole Friday rechecking | |
| 11:02:13 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: I register a bp, but I think that should push a spec to show more details, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/define-cyborg-arq-binding-notification-event | |
| 11:02:50 | bauzas | brinzhang_: ack, feel free to close the bug then with a link pointing to the bp | |
| 11:03:58 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: yeah, I think that we cannot hit new microversion, that just should add the event base on mivroversion 2.82 | |
| 11:04:17 | bauzas | I'm hungry, I can't think | |
| 11:04:55 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: ah, let me check in the future ^^ | |
| 11:27:59 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: you set bug 1872934 to wishlist? IMO, it just a bug, that canbe done with bug fix, right? | |
| 11:27:59 | openstack | bug 1872934 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Accurately clean up ARQs resources during build_instances() in conductor" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1872934 - Assigned to Brin Zhang (zhangbailin) | |
| 11:49:23 | hrw | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715979/ - anyone with free few minutes to get aarch64 feature matrix updated? needs +2+w | |
| 11:55:39 | bauzas | brinzhang_: I did set back to Low https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1872934 | |
| 11:55:39 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1872934 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Accurately clean up ARQs resources during build_instances() in conductor" [Low,Confirmed] - Assigned to Brin Zhang (zhangbailin) | |
| 11:55:48 | bauzas | brinzhang_: you can modify your own bugs FWIW | |
| 11:56:21 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: I can not change the importance of the bug, so pin to you | |
| 11:56:35 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: thanks ^ | |
| 11:56:56 | bauzas | brinzhang_: you can add yourself to https://launchpad.net/~nova-bugs to triage bugs | |
| 11:57:12 | bauzas | it's an open list | |
| 11:58:00 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: ack, done, thanks | |
| 12:02:45 | bauzas | brinzhang_: can I add you as a owner for 'cyborg' bugs ? (ie. within https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Tag_Owner_List ) | |
| 12:03:13 | bauzas | brinzhang_: nothing really important, but in case people would like to discuss bugs, you could be pinged | |
| 12:03:39 | bauzas | and sometimes if we see a lot of related bugs, we could ping you too | |
| 12:04:11 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: you can, I also can send these bug to cyborg team ^ | |
| 12:04:35 | bauzas | that's not mean that you should fix all of the bugs, just be a liaison for the cyborg team | |
| 12:04:54 | bauzas | brinzhang_: who is now the new Cyborg PTL ? | |
| 12:05:01 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: understand :P | |
| 12:05:47 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: Yumeng Bao <yumeng_bao@yahoo.com> | |
| 12:05:48 | bauzas | found it https://governance.openstack.org/election/results/victoria/ptl.html | |
| 12:05:53 | bauzas | kk | |
| 12:08:08 | bauzas | brinzhang_: done, thanks! https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Tag_Owner_List | |
| 12:08:22 | brinzhang_ | ack | |
| 12:09:17 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: can you change brinzhang_ to brinzhang ? | |
| 12:09:22 | bauzas | sure | |
| 12:10:02 | bauzas | done. | |
| 12:10:29 | brinzhang_ | thanks | |
| 12:12:11 | brinzhang_ | bauzas: good morning, hope have a good day ^, I will go home | |
| 12:12:17 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 12:12:30 | bauzas | (2pm14 atm, so I'm done with the morning :p | |
| 12:13:18 | brinzhang_ | ah, good afternoon. I am in evening :) | |
| 12:13:31 | brinzhang_ | +8 for UTC time | |
| 12:16:00 | gibi | slaweq, melwitt: I put https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1844929 back to Confirmed as the issue is still visible 5 days after the fix https://review.opendev.org/#/c/717662/ was merged | |
| 12:16:00 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1844929 in OpenStack Compute (nova) train "grenade jobs failing due to "Timed out waiting for response from cell" in scheduler" [High,In progress] - Assigned to melanie witt (melwitt) | |
| 12:16:46 | gibi | slaweq: thanks for the headsup | |
| 12:18:54 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: (efried just tagging you as an fyi) regarding the provider yaml feature https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/provider-config-file+(status:open+OR+status:merged) | |
| 12:19:52 | sean-k-mooney | i could proably finish that off early next cycle as it really just need a rebase and maybe some test fix ups | |
| 12:20:07 | sean-k-mooney | but im wondering is this is still a feature that people are interested in | |
| 12:20:32 | sean-k-mooney | the primary customer of this was intel for enabling RDT | |
| 12:20:52 | sean-k-mooney | so maybe alex_xu has input ^ | |
| 12:20:54 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I think it is worth to ask it on the ML and if nobody shows up then we can simply stop | |
| 12:21:07 | gibi | yeah, or alex_xu knows more | |
| 12:21:31 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: personally I (i.e. my employer) have no priority about that feature | |
| 12:22:06 | gibi | it is pretty close so I don't have problem reviewing it next cycle but I totally understand if you need to downprioritize it from your side | |
| 12:22:51 | sean-k-mooney | from a redhat persective the only request we have are from intel in relation to support of RDT in our product. but we dont nessiscarly have customer of OSP asking for it. | |
| 12:23:44 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ya the main thing i have to do other then rebase was to make the testing consitent | |
| 12:24:13 | sean-k-mooney | you asked to either use the yaml file or python but not do positive test in yaml and negitive in python | |
| 12:24:54 | sean-k-mooney | i had already adressed the other feedback but i also dont want to reporpose specs/feature if noone will end up using it | |
| 12:26:06 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: totally agree with you. I suggest to wait from alex_xu's response about it | |
| 12:26:23 | bauzas | gibi: fwiw, I'm about to confirm a gate issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1863889 | |
| 12:26:23 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1863889 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Revert resize problem in neutron-tempest-dvr-ha-multinode-full" [Medium,Confirmed] | |
| 12:26:23 | gibi | until that it is yet another unfinished feature | |
| 12:26:32 | bauzas | no need to keep it 'new' | |
| 12:26:32 | gibi | bauzas: I've just confirmed it | |
| 12:26:37 | bauzas | ah lol | |
| 12:26:43 | gibi | and tagged | |
| 12:26:54 | bauzas | we're fighting over the same list :p | |
| 12:26:58 | gibi | bauzas: I will go and look at the bug list from the top to avoid such conflict | |
| 12:27:14 | bauzas | take the semaphore if you want :p | |
| 12:27:29 | bauzas | gibi: I personnally look at this query ordered by age https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New&orderby=-datecreated&start=0 | |
| 12:27:35 | gibi | I think the list is long enough that we can eat it from two different direction | |
| 12:28:07 | bauzas | gibi: I could also briefly look at the 'in-progress' recent bugs that haven't been triaged yet | |
| 12:28:07 | gibi | do you walk that list from the top? | |
| 12:28:19 | bauzas | gibi: I do, because $regression check | |
| 12:28:29 | gibi | ok, then I will go from the bottom | |
| 12:28:37 | bauzas | old bugs that are more than 1 year old aren't really important so close to RC1 | |
| 12:28:52 | bauzas | gibi: well, I stopped triaging for a while and I'm seeing the same bugs | |
| 12:28:56 | bauzas | good luck with that | |
| 12:29:37 | bauzas | gibi: no, please, keep looking at the top list, I'll do something else with bugs that is important close to RC1 | |
| 12:30:12 | bauzas | gibi: like i said, I've stopped a couple of times some bugs that were in progress and were crucial because they were fixing a regression | |
| 12:30:30 | bauzas | we were just missing them since someone proposed a patch and didn't yell it | |
| 12:30:39 | gibi | bauzas: OK. I will look at the top for the next 30 minutes, then I have to jump on a call | |
| 12:30:59 | gibi | I will let you know when I released the semaphor | |
| 12:30:59 | bauzas | as soon as someone proposes a patch, then the related bugs disappear from our radara | |
| 12:31:02 | bauzas | radar* | |
| 12:31:19 | gibi | bauzas: yes, good point. If you have a good query for those bugs then please share | |
| 12:31:31 | bauzas | gibi: easy peasy, sec | |
| 12:34:00 | bauzas | gibi: https://frama.link/Z-EVGtyx | |
| 12:34:55 | bauzas | enjoy the list, 112 potential regressions :p | |
| 12:35:25 | bauzas | maybe 20 if we only consider the last 6 months | |
| 12:36:08 | bauzas | those bugs are in general written by developers who found a bug | |
| 12:36:34 | bauzas | whether the issue is new (hence a regression) or always existing, that's the crux of the problem :) | |