| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-04-15 | |||
| 12:22:51 | sean-k-mooney | from a redhat persective the only request we have are from intel in relation to support of RDT in our product. but we dont nessiscarly have customer of OSP asking for it. | |
| 12:23:44 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ya the main thing i have to do other then rebase was to make the testing consitent | |
| 12:24:13 | sean-k-mooney | you asked to either use the yaml file or python but not do positive test in yaml and negitive in python | |
| 12:24:54 | sean-k-mooney | i had already adressed the other feedback but i also dont want to reporpose specs/feature if noone will end up using it | |
| 12:26:06 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: totally agree with you. I suggest to wait from alex_xu's response about it | |
| 12:26:23 | bauzas | gibi: fwiw, I'm about to confirm a gate issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1863889 | |
| 12:26:23 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1863889 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Revert resize problem in neutron-tempest-dvr-ha-multinode-full" [Medium,Confirmed] | |
| 12:26:23 | gibi | until that it is yet another unfinished feature | |
| 12:26:32 | bauzas | no need to keep it 'new' | |
| 12:26:32 | gibi | bauzas: I've just confirmed it | |
| 12:26:37 | bauzas | ah lol | |
| 12:26:43 | gibi | and tagged | |
| 12:26:54 | bauzas | we're fighting over the same list :p | |
| 12:26:58 | gibi | bauzas: I will go and look at the bug list from the top to avoid such conflict | |
| 12:27:14 | bauzas | take the semaphore if you want :p | |
| 12:27:29 | bauzas | gibi: I personnally look at this query ordered by age https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New&orderby=-datecreated&start=0 | |
| 12:27:35 | gibi | I think the list is long enough that we can eat it from two different direction | |
| 12:28:07 | bauzas | gibi: I could also briefly look at the 'in-progress' recent bugs that haven't been triaged yet | |
| 12:28:07 | gibi | do you walk that list from the top? | |
| 12:28:19 | bauzas | gibi: I do, because $regression check | |
| 12:28:29 | gibi | ok, then I will go from the bottom | |
| 12:28:37 | bauzas | old bugs that are more than 1 year old aren't really important so close to RC1 | |
| 12:28:52 | bauzas | gibi: well, I stopped triaging for a while and I'm seeing the same bugs | |
| 12:28:56 | bauzas | good luck with that | |
| 12:29:37 | bauzas | gibi: no, please, keep looking at the top list, I'll do something else with bugs that is important close to RC1 | |
| 12:30:12 | bauzas | gibi: like i said, I've stopped a couple of times some bugs that were in progress and were crucial because they were fixing a regression | |
| 12:30:30 | bauzas | we were just missing them since someone proposed a patch and didn't yell it | |
| 12:30:39 | gibi | bauzas: OK. I will look at the top for the next 30 minutes, then I have to jump on a call | |
| 12:30:59 | gibi | I will let you know when I released the semaphor | |
| 12:30:59 | bauzas | as soon as someone proposes a patch, then the related bugs disappear from our radara | |
| 12:31:02 | bauzas | radar* | |
| 12:31:19 | gibi | bauzas: yes, good point. If you have a good query for those bugs then please share | |
| 12:31:31 | bauzas | gibi: easy peasy, sec | |
| 12:34:00 | bauzas | gibi: https://frama.link/Z-EVGtyx | |
| 12:34:55 | bauzas | enjoy the list, 112 potential regressions :p | |
| 12:35:25 | bauzas | maybe 20 if we only consider the last 6 months | |
| 12:36:08 | bauzas | those bugs are in general written by developers who found a bug | |
| 12:36:34 | bauzas | whether the issue is new (hence a regression) or always existing, that's the crux of the problem :) | |
| 12:38:37 | bauzas | gibi: like, first case https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1872385 | |
| 12:38:37 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1872385 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "delete sub resource provider in tree" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Wenping Song (wenping1) | |
| 12:39:06 | bauzas | yay... | |
| 12:40:22 | bauzas | gibi: we don't have yet ussuri-rc-potential tag ? | |
| 12:40:35 | sean-k-mooney | not offically but im already using it | |
| 12:40:42 | sean-k-mooney | i was going to go update the tags | |
| 12:41:13 | sean-k-mooney | sorry not the rc on i am using the backport potential one | |
| 12:41:20 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: just saying https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=ussuri-rc-potential | |
| 12:41:30 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: that's different | |
| 12:41:35 | sean-k-mooney | yes it is | |
| 12:41:49 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: you shouldn't use this tag (backport) yet | |
| 12:41:50 | sean-k-mooney | the cyborg bug is not an rc candiate | |
| 12:41:57 | sean-k-mooney | so i notice that both were missing | |
| 12:44:15 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: sorry I don't get you ? | |
| 12:44:52 | gibi | bauzas: I did not needed the tag yet | |
| 12:45:09 | gibi | bauzas: I thought it is created when first needed | |
| 12:45:12 | sean-k-mooney | from https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+manage-official-tags | |
| 12:45:25 | gibi | bauzas: is there another way to pre-create a tag? | |
| 12:45:29 | sean-k-mooney | i have moved ussuri-backport-potential to offical | |
| 12:45:50 | sean-k-mooney | but i cant add ussuri-rc-potential for some reason | |
| 12:46:11 | bauzas | gibi: no, you just use it on purpose but then you can promote it 'official' | |
| 12:46:14 | gibi | me neither | |
| 12:46:29 | bauzas | gibi: it will then raise the visibility | |
| 12:46:39 | gibi | OK | |
| 12:46:40 | bauzas | hold on, doing it for one bug | |
| 12:47:07 | bauzas | gibi: there https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=ussuri-rc-potential | |
| 12:47:25 | gibi | thanks | |
| 12:47:26 | bauzas | gibi: look at the right panels, you can see the list of tags | |
| 12:47:41 | bauzas | and there is one link for 'edit official tags' | |
| 12:47:55 | slaweq | gibi: thx a lot for checking this grenade issue | |
| 12:47:57 | sean-k-mooney | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+manage-official-tags | |
| 12:47:58 | bauzas | which leads to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+manage-official-tags | |
| 12:48:04 | bauzas | jinx | |
| 12:48:16 | gibi | OK, thanks I made it official | |
| 12:48:21 | bauzas | and then, I'm adding ussuri-rc-potential to the left list | |
| 12:49:08 | gibi | slaweq: I hope melwitt has some future ideas. she looked a lot at this bug | |
| 12:49:59 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: gibi: the ussuri-backport-potential is mostly used for knowing whether it's a good backport candidate after GA | |
| 12:50:12 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: yep i know | |
| 12:50:24 | bauzas | but we should iterate over the list of ussuri-rc-potential before and after RC1 | |
| 12:50:43 | bauzas | until we get 0 candidates | |
| 12:50:46 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i wanted to also flag that this was not intended to be fixed in the rc | |
| 12:50:57 | bauzas | the -backport tag ? yes | |
| 12:51:03 | bauzas | was that a question ? | |
| 12:51:30 | bauzas | like I said earlier "(14:49:59) bauzas: sean-k-mooney: gibi: the ussuri-backport-potential is mostly used for knowing whether it's a good backport candidate after GA" | |
| 12:51:32 | sean-k-mooney | yep im going to be reuploading it later today but i do not intend the patch to merge untill after ussuri is released then ill backport it | |
| 12:51:35 | bauzas | *after GA* | |
| 12:55:32 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: a cyborg patch you mean ? I'm confused again :) | |
| 12:57:44 | gibi | bauzas: I'm releasing the bug lock for now, need to jump on a call | |
| 12:58:18 | bauzas | gibi: ack | |
| 13:08:50 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: do you have a feeling about https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1863038 ? For me it seems that the routed network feautre was never considered ironic in the first place. | |
| 13:08:50 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1863038 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Nova need to consider ironic node as 'host'" [Undecided,New] | |
| 13:10:48 | bauzas | routed networks aren't a thing yet, right? | |
| 13:13:40 | gmann | stephenfin: chekcing.. | |
| 13:16:07 | gibi | bauzas: it works, in a narrow case | |
| 13:16:17 | bauzas | kk | |
| 13:16:21 | gibi | bauzas: when a port is pre-create with ip_allocation=deferred config | |
| 13:16:22 | bauzas | I missed that then | |
| 13:16:46 | gibi | for that case there was no need for nova change | |
| 13:17:19 | gibi | iff every network has a segment for every compute | |
| 13:18:24 | gibi | but overall you are right there is no real, good, tested routed net support in nova | |
| 13:22:06 | gmann | stephenfin: replied. please check | |
| 13:22:18 | gmann | stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/662968/9 | |