| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-20 | |||
| 01:06:20 | sean-k-mooney | which ill do tomorrow and then i can add the DNM nova multinode testing job | |
| 01:06:25 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708773/1 | |
| 01:06:55 | sean-k-mooney | that is the top of the chain so far | |
| 01:07:31 | sean-k-mooney | anyway after i fixed nested virt in my vms i can now deploy multinode locally and create vms with cybrog flavors | |
| 01:15:36 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: efried these are teh local.confs i am using http://paste.openstack.org/show/789773/ | |
| 01:18:17 | sean-k-mooney | ill try and get a multinode tempest-full job running in the morning i implement installtion of the client so i can automate creation fo the device profile. although i cloud also do that with curl if i have too | |
| 02:31:25 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: trivial: Remove unused 'cache_utils' APIs https://review.opendev.org/705652 | |
| 02:33:47 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Move nova-manage db purge to nova-audit https://review.opendev.org/708783 | |
| 02:33:47 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Move nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows to nova-audit https://review.opendev.org/708784 | |
| 02:33:48 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Move nova-manage cell_v2 discover_hosts to nova-audit https://review.opendev.org/708785 | |
| 02:33:48 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Move nova-manage cell_v2 map_instances to nova-audit https://review.opendev.org/708786 | |
| 02:33:49 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Move nova-manage placement sync_aggregates to nova-audit https://review.opendev.org/708787 | |
| 02:33:49 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Move nova-manage placement heal_allocations to nova-audit https://review.opendev.org/708788 | |
| 07:32:54 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug 1862633 https://review.opendev.org/706867 | |
| 07:32:54 | openstack | bug 1862633 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "unshelve leak allocation if update port fails" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862633 - Assigned to Balazs Gibizer (balazs-gibizer) | |
| 08:56:54 | stephenfin | efried: It would be better if johnthetubaguy can handle vTPM, but if he can't then I can | |
| 09:19:34 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: setup.cfg: Various Python 3 fixes https://review.opendev.org/708824 | |
| 09:40:05 | bauzas | efried: I can't attend this meeting but I'll leave notes in the etherpad | |
| 09:40:10 | bauzas | thanks for the ping either way | |
| 09:46:13 | kashyap | bauzas: "So, given a tempest.log, how do I find which was the last test to run?" | |
| 09:47:44 | bauzas | kashyap: link of the change? | |
| 09:49:17 | kashyap | bauzas: Actually, I forgot it is a local deployment that a QEMY developer was trying | |
| 10:06:03 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: tox: Configure 'ignore_basepython_conflict' https://review.opendev.org/708830 | |
| 10:06:03 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Remove six https://review.opendev.org/708831 | |
| 10:06:04 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Bump to hacking 2.x https://review.opendev.org/708832 | |
| 10:13:57 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP libvirt: Provide the backing file format when creating qcow2 disks https://review.opendev.org/708745 | |
| 11:07:01 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Don't print user_data for 'nova show' https://review.opendev.org/708850 | |
| 11:16:07 | ivve | hello, i have a nova block device attachments stuck (i have been trying to get it removed with nova and openstack commands but with no avail) i can see it still in the nova.block_device_mapping table, any recommendations on setting it properly to deleted? | |
| 11:16:35 | ivve | other than removing the entire row | |
| 11:53:04 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/queens: Mask the token used to allow access to consoles https://review.opendev.org/707845 | |
| 12:50:56 | gibi | efried: I will attend the nova meeting today to talk about FFE but I hope we can make it quick as I have a parallel meeting at the same time. | |
| 12:56:45 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: is that for the local cache or delete on terminate spec or both | |
| 12:57:13 | sean-k-mooney | i reviewd the delete on terminate spec and other then some minor wording issue i think its good to go | |
| 12:57:34 | sean-k-mooney | i have not looked at the local caching one in a few days but ill try to take a look before the meeting | |
| 12:58:06 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: efried collecs opinions here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ussuri-planning | |
| 12:58:39 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: for the local cache I think we can support that but we might not need to commit to it yet as there are os-brick and cinder dependencies to be implemnted first | |
| 12:58:42 | sean-k-mooney | ah righit i just comemnted on the spec ill add mine | |
| 12:58:57 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ya | |
| 12:59:15 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: i think cinder were planning to approve there FFE today before the nova meeting | |
| 12:59:18 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: for the delte on terminate I saw an API problem raised from gmann that wasnot resolved | |
| 12:59:55 | sean-k-mooney | ah i did not know he had raised an issue | |
| 13:01:39 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I'm trying to find the description of the problem | |
| 13:01:43 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ya so i realy dont know hwy we dont just support setting delete on terminate via a put to /servers/{server_id}/os-volume_attachments/{volume_id} | |
| 13:02:27 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/580336/28/specs/ussuri/approved/destroy-instance-with-datavolume.rst@43 | |
| 13:02:39 | sean-k-mooney | ^ was the open question i had. i assume PUT to that endpoing is how we trigger swap volumn? | |
| 13:02:49 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: because that PUT is for swap volume not for updating existing volume | |
| 13:03:22 | sean-k-mooney | ya that is what i was assuming | |
| 13:03:58 | sean-k-mooney | so we are just modifying the put then so that it only swaps the value if you alter the volume id | |
| 13:04:00 | gibi | so we made a suboptimal decision in the past to use PUT as swap and now we have no good place to implement a simple update as PUT is already used | |
| 13:04:06 | sean-k-mooney | which is why it is no optional in the spefc | |
| 13:04:24 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: well we could use patch | |
| 13:04:43 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I could accept to have a conditional swap as you described above | |
| 13:04:49 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I'm not sure gmann likes that | |
| 13:05:04 | sean-k-mooney | right well the spec currently had the conditional swap | |
| 13:05:20 | sean-k-mooney | was useing PATCH discussed? | |
| 13:06:20 | sean-k-mooney | PATCH is intended for a partial update where you jsut sent the data to be updated so PATCH would just contain delete_on_terminate=True|False in the body and use the volumn id for the url | |
| 13:06:38 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: ^ would you be ok with that? | |
| 13:06:55 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: it would allow put to be kept just for swap volumn | |
| 13:07:15 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: as far as I remember PATCH was not discussed | |
| 13:07:15 | sean-k-mooney | *volume | |
| 13:07:28 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I looked at the current version of the spec. I'm OK wiht the conditional swap | |
| 13:09:01 | gibi | but I would not like to +2 the patch without hearing back from gmann | |
| 13:09:13 | sean-k-mooney | sure | |
| 13:34:17 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Mask the token used to allow access to consoles https://review.opendev.org/708876 | |
| 13:35:05 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Mask the token used to allow access to consoles https://review.opendev.org/708876 | |
| 13:35:20 | openstackgerrit | Victor Coutellier proposed openstack/nova master: Non-Admin user can filter their instances by more filters https://review.opendev.org/701609 | |
| 13:47:32 | efried | stephenfin: regarding vTPM, is it something you would have time and desire to do? | |
| 13:50:55 | gmann | gibi: sean-k-mooney sounds good to me. my main concern is not to over-scope the existing swap API which makes our API hard/confusing to use. PATCH option looks good to me | |
| 13:51:00 | gibi | stephenfin: if you do the vTPM you can sign me up to review your patches | |
| 13:51:30 | gibi | gmann: so the current conditional PUT is not good for you but a separate PATCH would be good. | |
| 13:52:36 | gmann | gibi: yeah. because i also looked and none of the existing API i find suitable where we can add this feature. | |
| 13:53:05 | stephenfin | efried: Someone needs to do it, so yeah | |
| 13:53:12 | gibi | gmann: noted. Could you state that in the review with a -1? | |
| 13:53:15 | gmann | and as long as we keep that API very clear about updating only nova related/owned bits of volume not proxy to cinder | |
| 13:53:19 | stephenfin | I mean, I should have the bandwidth. It's just the reviews I'd need | |
| 13:53:23 | gmann | gibi: sure. | |
| 13:53:32 | gibi | gmann: thanks | |
| 13:53:35 | stephenfin | Story of my OpenStack life :) | |
| 13:54:09 | gibi | :) | |
| 13:55:16 | efried | stephenfin: okay, thanks for that. johnthetubaguy said it was important, and obviously jroll and the vmg folk want it, so... | |
| 13:56:38 | sean-k-mooney | efried: stephenfin for what its worth we want vtpm downstream as a medium to long term feature | |
| 13:57:01 | efried | sean-k-mooney: "we" == RH? | |
| 13:57:10 | kashyap | I think it might be the "royal we" :D | |
| 13:57:19 | stephenfin | in this case yeah | |
| 13:57:30 | sean-k-mooney | yep, we as in redhat. we dont need it in the next release but we expect customer two ask for it in the future | |
| 13:57:43 | efried | noted | |
| 13:58:03 | efried | Nova meeting in #openstack-meeting in ~2 mins | |
| 13:58:55 | sean-k-mooney | we have spoke to some goverment funded organisation in the eu where they were considering making tpm supprot a requirement in some cases. but its will be a whiel before anything like that comes into effect | |
| 14:00:42 | efried | lyarwood: fyi there's an agenda item to follow up about rocky EM | |
| 14:02:19 | lyarwood | efried: yup still not found time to do it sorry | |
| 14:02:26 | lyarwood | efried: rocky is at least passing now | |
| 14:02:36 | efried | no worries, just wanted an update for the record, will ask again officially :) | |
| 14:19:15 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Use tempest-full-py3 as base job https://review.opendev.org/708548 | |
| 14:21:37 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova stable/ocata: Use stable constraint for Tempest pinned stable branches https://review.opendev.org/706872 | |
| 14:44:34 | jroll | stephenfin: <3 thanks for picking that up | |
| 14:51:58 | alex_xu | gmann: gibi lyarwood sean-k-mooney, I guess we need to show the 'delete_on_termination' in GET method also, otherwise I don't know how the user know the current value for delete_on_termination. | |
| 14:52:06 | alex_xu | brinzhang__: ^ | |
| 14:52:40 | sean-k-mooney | am yes we could add that in the same microverion bump | |
| 14:52:55 | alex_xu | for PATCH, I just feel our existing PUT is behavior like PATCH, now we add another PATCH, then we add another mess :) | |
| 14:52:57 | brinzhang__ | alex_xu: agree, if the volume was speficied delete_on_termination, it shuold show | |