Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-11-18
10:39:23 kashyap So that's correct based on what was there at that time
10:39:36 zigo Right.
10:39:53 kashyap Yes, it is outdated. Updating these MediaWiki pages are a *pain* in the neck
10:40:16 zigo Yeah, the syntax is ... hum... suboptimal, to use nice words! :)
10:41:20 kashyap zigo: Refresh the page, and check if the Buster ("stable") looks correct now
10:42:13 zigo kashyap: Well, it looks ok to me, though instead of Buster ("sid") you may want to write Bullseye ("sid") and write what's there.
10:43:55 kashyap zigo: Right, let me do that
10:44:10 kashyap I'll update the Buster ("sid") --> Bullseye ("sid")
10:45:36 kashyap zigo: Am I correct in saying that what's at top-left (the 4.1.1) indicates the Bullseye ("sid") version? -- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qemu
10:45:45 kashyap Also what does the "1:" mean?
10:46:26 zigo kashyap: That's an "EPOCH".... basically, this is for when we do a mistake with the upstream version, and need to "upgrade" to a lower version.
10:46:34 zigo So, that's distro specific ...
10:46:40 kashyap Ah, right. The same concept exists in Fedora.
10:46:50 zigo 1:2.3.4 is higher that 2.3.5
10:46:51 kashyap Much frowned upon, though. :-)
10:47:05 kashyap Right.
10:47:18 zigo We try to avoid it as much as possible, because that's very confusing when writting dependency, and a mistake may happen very fast...
10:47:35 kashyap Yeah, it's an emergency hammer
10:47:53 zigo For example, if you want version >= 2.3.5 and forget the 1:, then you get 1:2.2.4 satisfying your dependency and you're screwed.
10:48:57 zigo Does anyone know if Nova fixed the issue of volume live migration in Rocky, and if yes, in what point release?
10:49:14 zigo I've tried upgrading os-brick to 2.5.8 in a compute, it didn't help...
10:49:21 zigo I'll try nova and cinder next...
10:50:02 kashyap zigo: Can you refresh the page to now check if Debian stuff is all kosher?
10:50:28 zigo kashyap: LGTM ! :)
10:51:07 kashyap stephenfin: Any ideas to transfer this to a better place than MediaWiki? -- can we do proper tables in rST?
10:51:14 kashyap https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtDistroSupportMatrix
10:51:19 kashyap The MediaWiki syntax sucks
10:51:55 kashyap We _can_ do tables in rST; I've done it myself. Perhaps will consider moving this page in-tree
11:04:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Convert legacy nova-live-migration and nova-multinode-grenade to py3 https://review.opendev.org/692374
11:12:20 zigo Ok, I found it, the issue is in Nova, and fixed by the point release in Rocky.
11:37:40 stephenfin kashyap: Yeah, that probably makes sense in doc/source/reference
11:37:47 stephenfin and you should be able to do it in tables, yup
11:40:58 kashyap stephenfin: Thanks! I'll get to it.
11:49:20 zigo Does anyone know which commit has the cinder volume live migration fix in Rocky?
11:50:06 lyarwood zigo: That's pretty generic, do you have a launchpad bug refrence I could check?
11:51:19 zigo lyarwood: Basically, in 18.1.0, live migrating a cinder volume never finshes, with 18.2.3 that's fixed...
11:51:33 zigo I don't know about any bug number though, I just tested and saw it was fixed.
11:51:47 zigo I'm trying to lookup commits now ...
11:52:58 lyarwood zigo: ah retyping a volume?
11:53:31 zigo lyarwood: Just live-migrating a volume:
11:53:31 zigo openstack volume migrate --host <volume-hostname> <volume-id>
11:53:37 lyarwood zigo: I landed https://review.opendev.org/#/q/I1bdf3431bda2da98380e0dcaa9f952e6768ca3af to fix that
11:53:42 zigo In 18.1.0, the new volume is re-attached ...
11:54:17 zigo ... but the old one never deleted (and both new and old are still in the bad migration status)
11:54:46 lyarwood ack yeah that came in with 18.2.1
11:55:07 zigo lyarwood: Thanks, this looks like it.
11:55:42 zigo lyarwood: FYI, I need to have the exact patch, so I get this fast in Buster (upgrading to 18.2.3 has a lot of chances to be unfortunately rejected by the Debian stable release team...)
11:56:03 lyarwood https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657577/ is the change
11:56:19 zigo Yeah, got it, thanks a lot.
12:00:27 zigo lyarwood: I need that one too, right?
12:00:29 zigo https://review.opendev.org/#/c/639331/
12:00:39 zigo Ah no, that's for tempest ...
12:04:47 lyarwood zigo: yeah you don't technically need that, it will however ensure things are tested correctly if Debian stable has CI for OpenStack
12:05:17 zigo lyarwood: Yeah, I may also patch the tempest package... :)
12:22:15 openstackgerrit Pavel Gluschak (scsnow) proposed openstack/nova master: Don't delete compute node, when deleting service other that nova-compute https://review.opendev.org/694756
12:27:49 openstackgerrit Pavel Gluschak (scsnow) proposed openstack/nova master: Don't delete compute node, when deleting service other than nova-compute https://review.opendev.org/694756
12:28:54 openstackgerrit Pavel Gluschak (scsnow) proposed openstack/nova master: Don't delete compute node, when deleting service other than nova-compute https://review.opendev.org/694756
12:43:46 efried o/ nova
12:43:46 efried I'm going to be out today.
12:43:46 efried Enjoy.
13:00:06 gibi efried_pto: enjoy your day too
14:23:50 mriedem i wonder, maybe we should drop using the neutron-grenade-multinode job which is 2 node grenade + smoke tests. we already have nova-grenade-multinode which is just live migration tests in both a block storage + lvm and shared storage + ceph setup. if we changed nova-grenade-multinode to run smoke tests + live migration for the block storage + lvm case, before changing the env to ceph, then we'd cover what the neutron-grenade-m
14:23:50 mriedem node job was doing
14:24:15 mriedem oh nova-grenade-multinode also runs a cold migrate test since train
14:27:15 sean-k-mooney mriedem: that sounds resonable. have you looked at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/548936/ it woudl be good to eventually get that merged to have a native grenade job
14:27:58 mriedem nope i haven't. it's huge and it scares me.
14:29:55 sean-k-mooney it is, it does appear to work at least. that said the last ci run was july so it might not anymore
14:34:43 mriedem grenade-core includes devstack-core and the devstack / qa team have done a lot of the initial zuulv3-ification of stuff, starting with devstack and tempest, so i'll defer to them for reviewing that massive zuulv3 chnage
14:34:47 mriedem *change
14:38:05 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: FUP to Ie1a0cbd82a617dbcc15729647218ac3e9cd0e5a9 https://review.opendev.org/694787
14:50:24 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Drop neutron-grenade-multinode job https://review.opendev.org/694789
14:57:36 artom If you do a Follow Up Patch to a Follow Up Patch, is it a Follow Up Patch Addendum?
15:07:26 mriedem so making nova-grenade-multinode run smoke tests adds about 14-15 minutes to the job unless we prune down the smoke tests that it runs which we might want to consider doing - to just run compute API and scenario smoke tests, though then we lose some of the coverage that neutron-grenade-multinode gave us,
15:07:44 mriedem though a nova change likely isn't going to break an identity/image/object/network/volume API change that doesn't use nova at all
15:19:21 mriedem i would need some help on the regexing though..
15:20:15 mriedem artom: you like a good regex test right?
15:20:20 mriedem say i have a test string of: tempest.api.compute.flavors.test_flavors.FlavorsV2TestJSON.test_get_flavor[id-1f12046b-753d-40d2-abb6-d8eb8b30cb2f,smoke]
15:20:40 mriedem i want to match tempest.api.compute.* and tempest.scenario.* but only for those strings containing 'smoke'
15:21:12 mriedem i think (tempest.api.compute.*|tempest.scenario.*)([\bsmoke\b]) might work?
15:21:58 artom mriedem, I think aspiers was the regex master, but I'll try
15:22:36 artom mriedem, that should work
15:23:19 artom I'd have done it as 'tempest\.(api\.compute|scenario)\..*smoke'
15:25:19 mriedem yeah that seems to work as long as smoke comes last
15:26:02 mriedem well, i guess there is no $ on the regex so i guess it's ok
15:26:23 artom So 'tempest\.(api\.compute|scenario)\..*smoke.*' then :)
15:26:25 mriedem tempest.(api.compute|scenario)\..*smoke.*
15:26:29 mriedem yeah
15:36:34 sean-k-mooney bauzas: could you take a look at https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bug/1763766 ideally im aiming to get this merged before m1
15:37:20 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: similar for https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/vm-scoped-sriov-numa-affinity if i can get that merged before m1 it would make peopel happy so if you could review it would be nice before i start asking others
15:59:02 bauzas sean-k-mooney: ack, will look
16:10:13 openstackgerrit Mark Goddard proposed openstack/nova master: [ironic] Fix node rebalance race issues https://review.opendev.org/694802
16:14:21 mriedem mgoddard: hi https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684849/
16:14:38 kashyap Can someone update the openSUSE stuff here? -- https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtDistroSupportMatrix
16:14:46 kashyap (I've updated for Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL and Fedora.)
16:14:58 kashyap Who's the contact point for Oracle Linux again?
16:15:46 mgoddard mriedem: thanks, I'll check it out
16:18:31 artom kashyap, probably Satan
16:19:09 artom Dammit ><
16:19:10 kashyap artom: Yeah, c'mon
16:22:07 mgoddard mriedem: it could be because I'm using Rocky, but I don't see any errors in RT following rebalance

Earlier   Later