| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-12-04 | |||
| 17:42:33 | mriedem | this is the libvirt code fwiw https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/5f648dda49a6d5fe5ecfd7dddcb5f7dc3d6b51a6/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L8609 | |
| 17:43:13 | cfriesen | maybe add a new "topology" section? | |
| 17:43:14 | mriedem | so there are 3 options: (1) include it directly in the server response details, (2) add a new subresource endpoint to servers (for show on a single server only), (3) make it part of diagnostics (which is also per server) | |
| 17:43:26 | mriedem | at this point you might want to take those 3 options to the ML | |
| 17:43:37 | cfriesen | okay, can do. | |
| 17:43:52 | sean-k-mooney | well we are already passing in the instance to that function and its in the dirver so that seam very doable | |
| 17:43:59 | mriedem | b/c alex_xu and gmann will probably also have input | |
| 17:44:17 | mriedem | sean-k-mooney: b/c the information they get comes from the driver, | |
| 17:44:25 | mriedem | for what this wants, we don't really need the driver, | |
| 17:44:32 | mriedem | we're just dumping info out of the db | |
| 17:45:19 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem: that is true altough i wonder if any of the driver treat the extra specs different | |
| 17:45:43 | mriedem | idk, i don't deal in numa | |
| 17:45:53 | mriedem | nova/virt/hardware.py is where i stop | |
| 17:46:07 | sean-k-mooney | cfriesen: efried: would praobly be another person to take a look | |
| 17:46:19 | efried | wha, wha? | |
| 17:46:28 | efried | how far back am I reading? | |
| 17:46:34 | mriedem | just post to the ML and let efried catch up there | |
| 17:46:43 | sean-k-mooney | efried: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612256/7/specs/stein/approved/show-server-numa-topology.rst | |
| 17:46:58 | sean-k-mooney | but ya we can disscuss on the ML too | |
| 17:47:48 | sean-k-mooney | efried: i was just wondering if we could make feature like this work well across powervm, libvirt, hyperv ectra | |
| 17:48:12 | efried | sean-k-mooney: PowerVM doesn't expose or allow you to muck with its numa topology. | |
| 17:49:22 | sean-k-mooney | but would i have info taht might make debuing for an admin simpler when dong device passhtou/cpu pinning/numa that could be useful to expose | |
| 17:50:01 | sean-k-mooney | i was just wondering how driver specific it would be or not | |
| 17:50:36 | sean-k-mooney | anyway im going to go grab food. ill be back later | |
| 17:54:51 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix guestfs.set_backend_settings call https://review.openstack.org/524748 | |
| 18:31:47 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add ratio online data migration when load compute node https://review.openstack.org/613499 | |
| 18:31:48 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add compute_node ratio online data migration script https://review.openstack.org/609995 | |
| 18:33:37 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec: Provider config YAML file https://review.openstack.org/612497 | |
| 19:34:08 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add compute_node ratio online data migration script https://review.openstack.org/609995 | |
| 19:34:29 | mriedem | jaypipes: i was just updating ^ and leaving comments probably while you were | |
| 19:34:35 | mriedem | see if your comments are addressed | |
| 19:34:50 | mriedem | oh wait | |
| 19:34:56 | mriedem | nvm, was thinking of https://review.openstack.org/609995 | |
| 19:37:20 | mriedem | jaypipes: dansmith: bauzas: efried: i'm +1 on this series https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/initial-allocation-ratios+(status:open+OR+status:merged) because i wanted to wait to +2 so that all of the changes can be approved together, since 2 and 3 in the series are kind of inter-dependent a bit, | |
| 19:37:45 | mriedem | so i'm looking for another +2 on the last 2 changes - the ones that deal with the online data migration | |
| 19:38:23 | efried | I'll look if you get desperate. But the discussion in placement has me convinced I am a tard when it comes to anything involving "data migration". | |
| 19:38:43 | mriedem | :/ | |
| 19:43:00 | jaypipes | mriedem: ack. will look in a bit. | |
| 19:43:40 | cfriesen | maybe a weird question, but how does nova-manage handle authentication? is it based off the config file and whoever is allowed to run the executable? | |
| 19:44:30 | cfriesen | I'm trying to sort out dependencies | |
| 19:49:47 | melwitt | cfriesen: yes. I think it doesn't yet [or may never] do anything like call out to REST APIs (doesn't need keystone auth). the auth info for the database access is part of the [database]connection and [api_database]connection settings in the nova config file. and generally admin RequestsContext are used so nova-manage is able to access any database record | |
| 19:51:33 | cfriesen | melwitt: thanks, that confirms what I thought. | |
| 20:07:30 | prometheanfire | mriedem: ping :D | |
| 20:07:39 | prometheanfire | you remember what we've done in the past for libvirt fails on rhel based stuff and uppdating stable branches? https://review.openstack.org/622548 the intention is that they would backport to ocata afaik | |
| 20:12:02 | mriedem | prometheanfire: well, upper-constraints is less of an issue, it's lower-constraints that really matters for stable | |
| 20:12:29 | mriedem | i have no idea what the support matrix is for stable/ocata wrt centors | |
| 20:12:31 | mriedem | *centos | |
| 20:12:40 | prometheanfire | mriedem: true, problem is libvirt starting to fail due to a minor release... | |
| 20:13:14 | prometheanfire | on gentoo I've always left it uncapped so the latest stable is always used | |
| 20:13:24 | prometheanfire | haven't had complaints, yet | |
| 20:14:11 | mriedem | so centos 7.6 (released yesterday) has libvirt 4.5 and therefore libvirt-python 4.4 from u-c fails to build with it, because it needs to be >= 4.5 right? | |
| 20:14:31 | prometheanfire | something like that, ya | |
| 20:15:31 | prometheanfire | the author would know more I imagine | |
| 20:15:44 | mriedem | i left a comment, only wondering why 4.10 is used over 4.5 | |
| 20:15:46 | mriedem | to match libvirt | |
| 20:16:27 | prometheanfire | mainly because it's the latest release and using a newer one is fine (and hopefully future proofs stuff a little) | |
| 20:20:01 | mriedem | ok, shrug; it's weird having something in u-c that is so dependent on native package versions | |
| 20:20:25 | mriedem | it would also be weird to me to update libvirt-python in stable/ocata u-c at this point, especially given what limited CI coverage we run on ocata now | |
| 20:21:22 | mriedem | i know nova doesn't run centos jobs on ocata (or anywhere ever) | |
| 20:21:25 | prometheanfire | ya, iirc libvirt-python is the only thing like that | |
| 20:21:40 | mriedem | what version of centos does infra support for ocata? | |
| 20:22:08 | mriedem | anyway, this is probably something for the -stable or -qa channel or something | |
| 20:22:11 | mriedem | not really a nova thing | |
| 20:27:17 | prometheanfire | k | |
| 20:56:34 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Note the aggregate allocation ratio restriction in scheduler docs https://review.openstack.org/620713 | |
| 20:56:34 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add docs for (initial) allocation ratio configuration https://review.openstack.org/622588 | |
| 20:56:37 | mriedem | yay docs | |
| 20:59:26 | sean-k-mooney | efried: you attended the GPU on openstack for sciense session in berlin | |
| 21:00:06 | efried | yes | |
| 21:00:24 | efried | sean-k-mooney: was that a question or a statement (because you saw me talk in the video)? | |
| 21:00:40 | sean-k-mooney | well statement i just finished watching it | |
| 21:00:54 | sean-k-mooney | did ye speak to them much after the video | |
| 21:01:25 | sean-k-mooney | looking at the options they were setting the missed a couple of things. | |
| 21:02:24 | sean-k-mooney | do you know if the benchmarks they were running are opensouce | |
| 21:02:40 | sean-k-mooney | i know its been a few monts so if you dont rememeber no worries | |
| 21:03:36 | efried | sean-k-mooney: I can give you the guy's email if it wasn't on the charts. I'm sure he would love to hear from you. | |
| 21:04:55 | sean-k-mooney | its on teh title slide | |
| 21:05:12 | sean-k-mooney | i might reach out to team | |
| 21:05:17 | sean-k-mooney | them | |
| 21:07:55 | sean-k-mooney | sicne they set isolcpus and did not use a dedicated emulator thread that will cause signifciant over head on 1 of the vm cores | |
| 21:32:26 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use ksa adapter for cinder client https://review.openstack.org/508345 | |
| 21:34:47 | openstackgerrit | Jack Ding proposed openstack/nova master: Improve libvirt image and snapshot handling https://review.openstack.org/616692 | |
| 21:35:30 | openstackgerrit | Dave McCowan proposed openstack/nova master: Prevent logging of encryption key value https://review.openstack.org/622605 | |
| 21:36:40 | openstackgerrit | Jack Ding proposed openstack/nova master: Correct instance port binding for rebuilds/reboots https://review.openstack.org/603844 | |
| 22:44:38 | mriedem | gd it's fun having stuff queued up for at least 9-10 hours before tests run on it, each day, taking about a week to merge code, weeeee | |
| 22:45:36 | sean-k-mooney | mriedem is taht only after the zuul change or has it been that way for a while | |
| 23:53:16 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Provider config file schema and loading https://review.openstack.org/622622 | |
| 23:57:13 | efried | jaypipes: code for the provider config YAML blueprint ^ | |
| 23:57:30 | efried | other than test, it's actually complete I think. | |
| #openstack-nova - 2018-12-05 | |||
| 01:46:15 | openstackgerrit | zhongshengping proposed openstack/nova master: Update mailinglist from dev to discuss https://review.openstack.org/621827 | |
| 01:51:16 | qwebirc716083 | join #openstack-nova | |
| 02:38:43 | openstackgerrit | Tushar Patil proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support filtering of allocation_candidates by forbidden aggregates https://review.openstack.org/609960 | |
| 02:42:37 | openstackgerrit | Jack Ding proposed openstack/nova master: Improve libvirt image and snapshot handling https://review.openstack.org/616692 | |
| 02:51:51 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Handle tags in _bury_in_cell0 https://review.openstack.org/621856 | |
| 03:21:26 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Remove utils.execute() calls from xenapi. https://review.openstack.org/619700 | |
| 04:41:11 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Body verification for the lock action https://review.openstack.org/622835 | |
| 05:47:44 | izza_ | hi guys | |
| 05:48:01 | izza_ | can anyone help us here on windows provisioning on openstack | |
| 06:30:30 | openstackgerrit | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Adds the server group info into show server detail API. https://review.openstack.org/621474 | |
| 06:34:28 | openstackgerrit | Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Add numa topology and pci devices into server detail API https://review.openstack.org/621476 | |