Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-12-04
19:34:56 mriedem nvm, was thinking of https://review.openstack.org/609995
19:37:20 mriedem jaypipes: dansmith: bauzas: efried: i'm +1 on this series https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/initial-allocation-ratios+(status:open+OR+status:merged) because i wanted to wait to +2 so that all of the changes can be approved together, since 2 and 3 in the series are kind of inter-dependent a bit,
19:37:45 mriedem so i'm looking for another +2 on the last 2 changes - the ones that deal with the online data migration
19:38:23 efried I'll look if you get desperate. But the discussion in placement has me convinced I am a tard when it comes to anything involving "data migration".
19:38:43 mriedem :/
19:43:00 jaypipes mriedem: ack. will look in a bit.
19:43:40 cfriesen maybe a weird question, but how does nova-manage handle authentication? is it based off the config file and whoever is allowed to run the executable?
19:44:30 cfriesen I'm trying to sort out dependencies
19:49:47 melwitt cfriesen: yes. I think it doesn't yet [or may never] do anything like call out to REST APIs (doesn't need keystone auth). the auth info for the database access is part of the [database]connection and [api_database]connection settings in the nova config file. and generally admin RequestsContext are used so nova-manage is able to access any database record
19:51:33 cfriesen melwitt: thanks, that confirms what I thought.
20:07:30 prometheanfire mriedem: ping :D
20:07:39 prometheanfire you remember what we've done in the past for libvirt fails on rhel based stuff and uppdating stable branches? https://review.openstack.org/622548 the intention is that they would backport to ocata afaik
20:12:02 mriedem prometheanfire: well, upper-constraints is less of an issue, it's lower-constraints that really matters for stable
20:12:29 mriedem i have no idea what the support matrix is for stable/ocata wrt centors
20:12:31 mriedem *centos
20:12:40 prometheanfire mriedem: true, problem is libvirt starting to fail due to a minor release...
20:13:14 prometheanfire on gentoo I've always left it uncapped so the latest stable is always used
20:13:24 prometheanfire haven't had complaints, yet
20:14:11 mriedem so centos 7.6 (released yesterday) has libvirt 4.5 and therefore libvirt-python 4.4 from u-c fails to build with it, because it needs to be >= 4.5 right?
20:14:31 prometheanfire something like that, ya
20:15:31 prometheanfire the author would know more I imagine
20:15:44 mriedem i left a comment, only wondering why 4.10 is used over 4.5
20:15:46 mriedem to match libvirt
20:16:27 prometheanfire mainly because it's the latest release and using a newer one is fine (and hopefully future proofs stuff a little)
20:20:01 mriedem ok, shrug; it's weird having something in u-c that is so dependent on native package versions
20:20:25 mriedem it would also be weird to me to update libvirt-python in stable/ocata u-c at this point, especially given what limited CI coverage we run on ocata now
20:21:22 mriedem i know nova doesn't run centos jobs on ocata (or anywhere ever)
20:21:25 prometheanfire ya, iirc libvirt-python is the only thing like that
20:21:40 mriedem what version of centos does infra support for ocata?
20:22:08 mriedem anyway, this is probably something for the -stable or -qa channel or something
20:22:11 mriedem not really a nova thing
20:27:17 prometheanfire k
20:56:34 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Note the aggregate allocation ratio restriction in scheduler docs https://review.openstack.org/620713
20:56:34 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add docs for (initial) allocation ratio configuration https://review.openstack.org/622588
20:56:37 mriedem yay docs
20:59:26 sean-k-mooney efried: you attended the GPU on openstack for sciense session in berlin
21:00:06 efried yes
21:00:24 efried sean-k-mooney: was that a question or a statement (because you saw me talk in the video)?
21:00:40 sean-k-mooney well statement i just finished watching it
21:00:54 sean-k-mooney did ye speak to them much after the video
21:01:25 sean-k-mooney looking at the options they were setting the missed a couple of things.
21:02:24 sean-k-mooney do you know if the benchmarks they were running are opensouce
21:02:40 sean-k-mooney i know its been a few monts so if you dont rememeber no worries
21:03:36 efried sean-k-mooney: I can give you the guy's email if it wasn't on the charts. I'm sure he would love to hear from you.
21:04:55 sean-k-mooney its on teh title slide
21:05:12 sean-k-mooney i might reach out to team
21:05:17 sean-k-mooney them
21:07:55 sean-k-mooney sicne they set isolcpus and did not use a dedicated emulator thread that will cause signifciant over head on 1 of the vm cores
21:32:26 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use ksa adapter for cinder client https://review.openstack.org/508345
21:34:47 openstackgerrit Jack Ding proposed openstack/nova master: Improve libvirt image and snapshot handling https://review.openstack.org/616692
21:35:30 openstackgerrit Dave McCowan proposed openstack/nova master: Prevent logging of encryption key value https://review.openstack.org/622605
21:36:40 openstackgerrit Jack Ding proposed openstack/nova master: Correct instance port binding for rebuilds/reboots https://review.openstack.org/603844
22:44:38 mriedem gd it's fun having stuff queued up for at least 9-10 hours before tests run on it, each day, taking about a week to merge code, weeeee
22:45:36 sean-k-mooney mriedem is taht only after the zuul change or has it been that way for a while
23:53:16 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Provider config file schema and loading https://review.openstack.org/622622
23:57:13 efried jaypipes: code for the provider config YAML blueprint ^
23:57:30 efried other than test, it's actually complete I think.
#openstack-nova - 2018-12-05
01:46:15 openstackgerrit zhongshengping proposed openstack/nova master: Update mailinglist from dev to discuss https://review.openstack.org/621827
01:51:16 qwebirc716083 join #openstack-nova
02:38:43 openstackgerrit Tushar Patil proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support filtering of allocation_candidates by forbidden aggregates https://review.openstack.org/609960
02:42:37 openstackgerrit Jack Ding proposed openstack/nova master: Improve libvirt image and snapshot handling https://review.openstack.org/616692
02:51:51 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Handle tags in _bury_in_cell0 https://review.openstack.org/621856
03:21:26 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Remove utils.execute() calls from xenapi. https://review.openstack.org/619700
04:41:11 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Body verification for the lock action https://review.openstack.org/622835
05:47:44 izza_ hi guys
05:48:01 izza_ can anyone help us here on windows provisioning on openstack
06:30:30 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Adds the server group info into show server detail API. https://review.openstack.org/621474
06:34:28 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova master: Add numa topology and pci devices into server detail API https://review.openstack.org/621476
07:13:15 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add 'show-server-group' spec https://review.openstack.org/612255
07:26:41 openstackgerrit Yongli He proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add spec "show-server-numa-topology" https://review.openstack.org/612256
07:30:39 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Body verification for the lock action https://review.openstack.org/622835
07:39:10 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: Body verification for the lock action https://review.openstack.org/622835
08:10:17 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Handle tags in _bury_in_cell0 https://review.openstack.org/621856
08:25:01 izza_ hi
08:25:22 izza_ can anyone help us here how to install windows in trial version in openstack
08:25:38 izza_ i saw procedure but it is looking for a license windows
08:33:33 tssurya mriedem: yea here https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1805984
08:33:33 openstack Launchpad bug 1805984 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Placement is not aware of disable compute nodes" [Undecided,New]
08:38:52 izza_ hi
08:38:53 openstackgerrit Rui Zang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Virtual persistent memory libvirt driver implementation https://review.openstack.org/622893
08:39:23 izza_ is it possible to install windows trial version on openstack?
08:51:17 openstackgerrit Rui Zang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: support virtual persistent memory https://review.openstack.org/601596
10:18:33 openstackgerrit Bhagyashri Shewale proposed openstack/nova master: PCPU: Define numa dedicated CPU resource class https://review.openstack.org/561770
10:18:33 openstackgerrit Bhagyashri Shewale proposed openstack/nova master: NUMACell, InstanceNUMACell: Adopt 'PCPU' changes https://review.openstack.org/576021
10:18:34 openstackgerrit Bhagyashri Shewale proposed openstack/nova master: Report PCPU to placement https://review.openstack.org/577038
10:18:34 openstackgerrit Bhagyashri Shewale proposed openstack/nova master: Virt driver: Build guest xml https://review.openstack.org/577372
10:34:13 openstackgerrit Theodoros Tsioutsias proposed openstack/nova master: Introduce the PENDING instance state https://review.openstack.org/566473
10:42:18 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/osc-placement master: tox: Hide deprecation warnings from stdlib https://review.openstack.org/611884
10:54:47 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Always read-deleted=yes on lazy-load https://review.openstack.org/575190
11:03:13 kashyap stephenfin: Hi, I got (again) logged out of IRC here. So if you pinged me, I haven't noticed.
11:03:23 kashyap But yes, this is on the top of my pile: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575735/
11:10:13 zigo I'm getting this in my nova-compute.log: http://paste.openstack.org/show/736696/ Where should I look to fix this?
11:11:54 zigo "Placement API returning an error response: JSON does not validate: 0 is less than the minimum of 1" in nova-placement-api.log too ...
11:12:25 zigo bauzas: ^ help ? :)
11:14:20 gibi zigo: '[{'DISK_GB': {'max_unit': 0, 'step_size': 1, 'min_unit': 1, 'reserved': 0, 'allocation_ratio': 1.0, 'total': 0}' it is an invalid part as total needs to be >= 1
11:14:46 gibi zigo: if there is no resouce of DISK_GB then we should not include the resource class to the request at all
11:15:07 zigo gibi: Ok, so it lacks space on the Ceph backend, or something?
11:16:33 kashyap gibi: Hi, I'm just doing another test for this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575735/
11:16:34 gibi zigo: somehow the nova-compute sees 0 disk
11:16:41 zigo Right.

Earlier   Later