| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-10-10 | |||
| 04:27:35 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Nova Cyborg interaction specification. https://review.openstack.org/603955 | |
| 05:55:47 | gmann | alex_xu hi, will you be there for API office hour ? | |
| 05:56:23 | alex_xu | gmann: yea | |
| 05:56:31 | gmann | cool, | |
| 06:01:53 | gmann | let's start | |
| 06:02:03 | gmann | #startmeeting nova api | |
| 06:02:04 | openstack | Meeting started Wed Oct 10 06:02:03 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 06:02:05 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 06:02:07 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'nova_api' | |
| 06:02:38 | gmann | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours | |
| 06:02:41 | gmann | agenda ^^ | |
| 06:03:11 | gmann | i have not got the much time to review for couple of weeks. | |
| 06:03:27 | gmann | #topic API Subteam Tracking | |
| 06:03:34 | gmann | #linkhttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stein-nova-subteam-tracking | |
| 06:03:51 | gmann | i added the approved/under review BP related to API on this extherpad | |
| 06:04:01 | gmann | l63 | |
| 06:04:36 | alex_xu | currently we have an api bp in the runway | |
| 06:04:53 | gmann | yeah | |
| 06:05:35 | gmann | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-runways-stein | |
| 06:06:30 | alex_xu | yea, the volume type in boot | |
| 06:07:09 | alex_xu | how much we left for extension merge? | |
| 06:07:29 | gmann | alex_xu: link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/api-extensions-merge-stein+status:open | |
| 06:07:34 | gmann | 3-4 patch i will say. | |
| 06:07:40 | gmann | i need to rebase them though | |
| 06:07:43 | alex_xu | cool | |
| 06:08:09 | gmann | this is last patch where i am removing the extensions register logic from wsgi.py - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607092/ | |
| 06:08:26 | gmann | this is WIP, still mode code to remove | |
| 06:09:31 | alex_xu | cool, simpler code | |
| 06:10:08 | gmann | yeah, i will work on those and finish soon | |
| 06:10:19 | alex_xu | thanks | |
| 06:12:06 | gmann | alex_xu: i think we can remove this too - wsgi_action_extensions | |
| 06:12:25 | gmann | do you remember any of action extensions ? | |
| 06:13:00 | gmann | this one - https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/wsgi.py#L468 | |
| 06:13:04 | alex_xu | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607092/1/nova/api/openstack/compute/routes.py@252 | |
| 06:13:26 | alex_xu | what benefit we remove it? | |
| 06:14:56 | gmann | humm, i was thinking for same resource side but these are all separate entry point for resource action | |
| 06:15:25 | gmann | agree to keep them separate. | |
| 06:16:13 | alex_xu | still feel a lot of complex thing in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607092/1/nova/api/openstack/wsgi.py | |
| 06:16:50 | gmann | true, it could be more simpler | |
| 06:17:24 | alex_xu | without extension, does this still useful https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607092/1/nova/api/openstack/wsgi.py@88 | |
| 06:17:36 | alex_xu | gmann: ^ maybe worth to check this in your last patch | |
| 06:17:57 | alex_xu | I remember that is used for cache the response obj for the extension, not sure whether it is used by other place | |
| 06:18:36 | alex_xu | gmann: sorry, I mean those cache interface https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607092/1/nova/api/openstack/wsgi.py@97 | |
| 06:19:17 | gmann | yeah those were mainly used in extensions code but i can check if anywhere we use them | |
| 06:19:34 | gmann | but Request object we need | |
| 06:20:07 | alex_xu | yes, we need Req obj | |
| 06:21:46 | gmann | alex_xu: quickly grep them and it is only extensions code. i will remove them thanks. | |
| 06:22:08 | alex_xu | cool \o/ | |
| 06:22:32 | gmann | alex_xu: i will make this patch up by tonight and make it ready for you by tomorrow so that u can check if any more bits we can remove | |
| 06:22:45 | alex_xu | gmann: yea, will do | |
| 06:23:39 | gmann | thanks | |
| 06:23:46 | gmann | moving next | |
| 06:24:13 | gmann | api cleanup things | |
| 06:24:15 | gmann | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-api-cleanup | |
| 06:24:47 | gmann | and spec which need to include the hypervisor API cleanup - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603969/ | |
| 06:25:24 | gmann | we need to weight on those with what worth to do and what not | |
| 06:25:58 | gmann | and next question on this is - should we do this in stein ? or wait for T to collect more worthy cleanup ? | |
| 06:27:02 | gmann | i can keep it updated for stein and wait till T if any more related API cleanup. And then we do those in single version bump based on agreement | |
| 06:27:07 | gmann | alex_xu: what u say ? | |
| 06:27:14 | alex_xu | pretty sure we won't get rid of all the cleanup in one microversion | |
| 06:27:30 | alex_xu | see the past, how much microversion we spend on deprecate proxy API :) | |
| 06:27:50 | gmann | :) yeah | |
| 06:28:08 | alex_xu | I will review the spec | |
| 06:28:13 | gmann | all you mean "all listed in etherpad" or all in API (because we do not know them now) | |
| 06:28:33 | alex_xu | all in API | |
| 06:28:59 | gmann | true, so that's is reason i want to wait till T so that we can cover max. | |
| 06:29:39 | alex_xu | maybe based on the requirement, if there is nothing urgent to change, then we needn't do it very soon | |
| 06:29:45 | gmann | and conclude that "this is we are not going to do" "this is ok to do". so that these does not comes again in future | |
| 06:29:52 | gmann | yeah | |
| 06:30:50 | gmann | i do not think anything urgent on those but i will also get opinion from mriedem and melwitt | |
| 06:31:01 | gmann | also | |
| 06:31:20 | alex_xu | I'm afriad another option is microversion shouldn't be huge | |
| 06:31:35 | gmann | humm | |
| 06:32:18 | gmann | i feel it should not be huge in term of complexity but should be ok in term of numbers. | |
| 06:33:54 | gmann | anyways that we can discuss on spec with exact list of changes | |
| 06:34:20 | alex_xu | yea | |
| 06:34:38 | gmann | anything else on this or we move next ? | |
| 06:35:19 | alex_xu | no more from me | |
| 06:35:31 | gmann | ok | |
| 06:35:56 | gmann | i do not have anything else to discuss form API subteam tracking section. | |
| 06:36:02 | gmann | alex_xu: do you have ? | |
| 06:36:13 | alex_xu | no | |
| 06:36:18 | gmann | ok | |
| 06:36:20 | gmann | #topic Bug Triage/Discussion | |
| 06:36:32 | gmann | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-api-weekly-bug-report | |
| 06:37:16 | openstackgerrit | Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec: Support filtering by forbidden aggregate https://review.openstack.org/603352 | |
| 06:38:12 | gmann | there are 4 new bugs | |
| 06:38:57 | gmann | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1789382 | |
| 06:38:57 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1789382 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "openstack server list error" [Undecided,New] | |
| 06:39:03 | gmann | seems timeout from cell ? | |
| 06:40:54 | alex_xu | also see 'TypeError: 'object' object is not iterable' after cell timeout | |
| 06:41:18 | alex_xu | cell timeout is just a warning | |
| 06:42:32 | alex_xu | sounds like we handle something wrong | |
| 06:43:08 | gmann | humm object is none or something may be | |
| 06:44:31 | gmann | let me ask more log of api and compute | |
| 06:45:00 | gmann | i did not find any other pointer to debug without those | |
| 06:45:37 | alex_xu | yes | |
| 06:49:18 | gmann | done | |
| 06:49:28 | gmann | it seems hitting here - https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/c6218428e9b29a2c52808ec7d27b4b21aadc0299/nova/compute/multi_cell_list.py#L265 | |
| 06:50:21 | gmann | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1796132 | |