Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-10-10
06:43:08 gmann humm object is none or something may be
06:44:31 gmann let me ask more log of api and compute
06:45:00 gmann i did not find any other pointer to debug without those
06:45:37 alex_xu yes
06:49:18 gmann done
06:49:28 gmann it seems hitting here - https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/c6218428e9b29a2c52808ec7d27b4b21aadc0299/nova/compute/multi_cell_list.py#L265
06:50:21 gmann #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1796132
06:50:21 openstack Launchpad bug 1796132 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "SSL Verification Error on Launch Instance (queens)" [Undecided,New]
06:50:32 gmann "Seems forcing everythign to https isn't the wisest choice and requires more nova specific ssl config, I'll be going back to using http, so this bug may no longer be valid to work on."
06:50:44 gmann comments from author ^^
06:52:06 gmann should we mark it invalid then ?
06:52:51 gmann seems like glance was not on https
06:53:06 gmann SSLError: SSL exception connecting to https://10.5.25.19:9292/v2/images/fd9637fb-57e8-4c43-9
06:53:53 alex_xu I don't know, is it configure mistake?
06:54:11 gmann seems so
06:54:31 alex_xu i don't familar this part
06:54:40 gmann i will ask on bug is that is solved with all having on https or not
06:56:45 gmann done
06:57:10 gmann it is almost time and other bugs we can do next week or in between of next office hour
06:57:22 alex_xu yes
06:57:43 gmann #topic Open Discussion
06:57:59 gmann anything else alex_xu you want to discuss otherwise we close for today ?
06:58:08 alex_xu nothing from me
06:58:24 gmann alex_xu: thanks for joining. this really help.
06:58:32 alex_xu np
06:58:37 gmann #endmeeting
06:58:39 openstack Meeting ended Wed Oct 10 06:58:37 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
06:58:40 openstack Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_api/2018/nova_api.2018-10-10-06.02.html
06:58:41 openstack Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_api/2018/nova_api.2018-10-10-06.02.txt
06:58:42 openstack Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_api/2018/nova_api.2018-10-10-06.02.log.html
07:08:36 openstackgerrit Martin Midolesov proposed openstack/nova master: vmware:PropertyCollector for caching instance properties https://review.openstack.org/608278
07:14:09 openstackgerrit Lucian Petrut proposed openstack/nova master: Fix os-simple-tenant-usage result order https://review.openstack.org/608685
08:38:11 ygk12345 hi all
08:38:23 ygk12345 I am unable to unshelve an instance whihc is in shelve offload state
08:39:24 bauzas ygk12345: stack trace ?
08:39:50 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add microversion 2.67 to support volume_type https://review.openstack.org/606398
08:40:09 ygk12345 the instance is still in shelved state and in shutdown state
08:40:15 ygk12345 bauzas: it is mitaka
08:41:02 ygk12345 bauzas: I dont see any hypervisor allocated to it
08:42:31 ygk12345 bauzas: DEBUG (session:277) RESP: [404] Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:41:47 GMT Content-Length: 52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Compute-Request-Id: req-f192f22e-9cd9-4b41-9863-c9752acbf95f RESP BODY: 404 Not Found The resource could not be found.
08:42:45 ygk12345 bauzas: is it deleted ?
08:46:32 bauzas ygk12345: do you have an ERROR log when unshelving?
08:46:42 ygk12345 no
08:47:06 ygk12345 it is saying "resource could not be found" in the debug output
08:49:43 bauzas ygk12345: what tells you the os-instance-actions API ?
08:51:09 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add restrictions on ``updated_at`` when getting migrations https://review.openstack.org/607798
08:55:16 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add restrictions on ``updated_at`` when getting instance action records https://review.openstack.org/607801
08:56:35 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Add restrictions on ``updated_at`` when getting migrations https://review.openstack.org/607798
08:58:57 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Remove force flag from live-migrate and evacuate https://review.openstack.org/609330
09:07:41 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Merge used_limits extension response into limit view builder https://review.openstack.org/606031
09:07:58 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Merge image_size extension response into image view builder https://review.openstack.org/606845
09:08:32 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove more code related to extensions and testing https://review.openstack.org/607088
09:21:50 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP]Remove extensions loading framework from wsgi.py https://review.openstack.org/607092
09:35:08 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support initial allocation ratios https://review.openstack.org/552105
10:10:49 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Don't configure '[scheduler] discover_hosts_in_cells_interval' https://review.openstack.org/609345
10:10:49 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Deprecate the 'discover_hosts_in_cells_interval' option https://review.openstack.org/609346
10:16:39 gmann alex_xu: do you remember any case where we extended the response of action class with @wsgi.extends(action ?
10:17:01 gmann alex_xu: this case - https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/6bf11e1dc14afad78b11d980c2544a3dc41579ff/nova/api/openstack/wsgi.py#L772
10:17:53 gmann alex_xu: because that is what populate self.wsgi_action_extensions - https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/6bf11e1dc14afad78b11d980c2544a3dc41579ff/nova/api/openstack/wsgi.py#L489
10:18:20 gmann alex_xu: this list goes as action (self.wsgi_action) - https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/compute/routes.py#L266
10:19:20 gmann alex_xu: so we are good to remove the self.wsgi_action_extensions too along with self.wsgi_xtensions.
10:51:47 alex_xu gmann: I thought wsgi_action_extensions is for the whole action?
10:51:55 alex_xu not just the response of the action
10:55:12 alex_xu gmann: I think you are right
10:55:43 alex_xu gmann: we don't need 'register_extensions' method at all
10:57:17 gmann alex_xu: yea.
11:02:59 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Use oslo_db.sqlalchemy.test_fixtures https://review.openstack.org/609352
11:17:01 openstackgerrit Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: [DNM] test linux pytoute impl https://review.openstack.org/609354
11:59:44 aspiers melwitt: following on from my colleague JP's discussion with nova folks at the PTG regarding adding AMD SEV support to nova, I've done a bunch of research regarding possible implementations and am writing a spec and bp which I hope to submit very shortly. Thought I'd give you a heads-up just in case there's anything you'd like to discuss.
12:53:58 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Time how long select_destinations() takes in conductor https://review.openstack.org/608575
12:54:19 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Replace usage of get_legacy_facade() with get_engine() https://review.openstack.org/608574
12:54:54 mikeoschen join #openstack-sdks
12:57:12 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove the extensions framework from wsgi.py https://review.openstack.org/607092
13:04:13 pooja_jadhav hi team, how I can create a BFV instance in the api-sample-tests for testing. please guide me for the same.
13:05:59 pooja_jadhav I am referring https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/85b36cd2f82ccd740057c1bee08fc722209604ab/nova/tests/functional/api_sample_tests/api_samples/servers/v2.42/server-create-req.json.tpl
13:07:11 pooja_jadhav for creating an instance. but compute_utils. is_volume_backed giving False for the instance.
13:11:27 pooja_jadhav gmann: ^^
13:13:30 gmann pooja_jadhav: oh, that did not work ?
13:14:18 pooja_jadhav gmann: unfortunately, no :(
13:14:59 mriedem you'd have to use the cinder fixture for one thing
13:15:06 pooja_jadhav gmann: can u plz tell me.. which existing json.tpl should I use to create a BFV instance??
13:15:22 mriedem https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/85b36cd2f82ccd740057c1bee08fc722209604ab/nova/tests/functional/api_sample_tests/api_samples/servers/v2.42/server-create-req.json.tpl isn't going to work since the cinder fixture doesn't create volumes
13:15:59 gmann i suggest to write funtional test for that instead of sample tests
13:16:02 mriedem see how https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/85b36cd2f82ccd740057c1bee08fc722209604ab/nova/tests/fixtures.py#L1583 is used in functional tests
13:16:17 mriedem e.g. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/608771/
13:21:30 Luzi hey Nova, we've written the Spec for Image Encryption for Nova and would appreciate reviews :) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/608696/
13:21:53 pooja_jadhav mriedem, gmann: thanks will look into this
13:22:13 gmann mriedem: yeah, pooja_jadhav tried to add the create volumes stub there
13:22:13 jangutter sean-k-mooney, jaypipes: I'm looking at https://github.com/openstack/os-vif/blob/master/os_vif/objects/host_info.py and I've got some questions. (will post them to the room in general)
13:22:32 sean-k-mooney jangutter: sure go for it
13:22:40 jaypipes I blame sean-k-mooney.
13:22:48 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: I wonder if we should be setting 'model' here for SR-IOV VIFs? https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/6bf11e1dc14afad78b11d980c2544a3dc41579ff/nova/virt/libvirt/vif.py#L130-L133
13:23:05 gmann pooja_jadhav: mriedem i feel normal functional tests make more sense to verify the compute_utils. is_volume_backed instead of api sample tests
13:23:15 gmann like example mriedem mentioned
13:23:18 jangutter for the host_info objects, there's a mechanism to filter vif types by name and version, but not a corresponding mechanism for port_profiles.
13:23:23 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove the caching the resource on Request object https://review.openstack.org/609403
13:23:51 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove more code related to extensions and testing https://review.openstack.org/607088
13:23:59 sean-k-mooney stephenfin sorry taught that message was from jangutter am in what context
13:24:02 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove the extensions framework from wsgi.py https://review.openstack.org/607092
13:24:03 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: If we do and that hw_vif_model==virtio, we'll undo the hard work of https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/622ebf2fab0a9bf75ee12437bef28f60e083f849 right?

Earlier   Later