Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-06-29
08:52:14 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: Add policy rule to block image-backed servers with 0 root disk flavor https://review.openstack.org/563700
09:08:41 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Use ironic-tempest-dsvm-ipa-wholedisk-bios-agent_ipmitool-tinyipa in tree https://review.openstack.org/578878
09:08:55 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Use nova.db.api directly https://review.openstack.org/543262
09:12:01 PapaOurs cdent: good morning
09:12:11 cdent morning
09:12:14 PapaOurs cdent: re: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575127/2/nova/api/openstack/placement/util.py
09:12:34 PapaOurs cdent: looks like the minimum webob version we support doesn't have it
09:13:00 PapaOurs cdent: https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/lower-constraints.txt#L18
09:13:09 cdent ah, yeah, that's probably true.
09:13:31 cdent It came in with webob's big accept header refactoring
09:13:58 cdent it would be nice to raise the constraint if possible, but I could also adapt that code I suspect
09:14:51 cdent PapaOurs: what's your opinion?
09:15:55 PapaOurs cdent: I dunno
09:16:03 PapaOurs cdent: I'm not super expert on g-r
09:16:17 PapaOurs cdent: what I know is that we can at least ask for a bump on lower-reqs
09:16:42 PapaOurs but the big webob refactoring could be refraining people accepting this bump
09:17:29 PapaOurs cdent: so we could be more conservative on placement, and just try to have a backwards compatible call
09:17:32 cdent how did you discover this?
09:17:40 PapaOurs cdent: a downstream bug
09:17:56 PapaOurs cdent: since lower-reqs aren't updated, we're still on 1.7
09:18:25 cdent have you got time to make a patch?
09:18:35 cdent (if not, I can give it a go)
09:19:39 PapaOurs cdent: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596308
09:19:39 openstack bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1596308 in openstack-nova "Placement API unexpected error: 'MIMEAccept' object has no attribute 'acceptable_offers'" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to nova-maint
09:20:31 PapaOurs cdent: I can file an upstream bug against nova, and do the patch yeah
09:20:42 PapaOurs patch(es) even
09:20:44 cdent that would be awesome
09:20:54 PapaOurs one for lower-reqs, and one for placement
09:27:40 cdent PapaOurs: please mention the bug here once you create it
09:27:59 PapaOurs cdent: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1779287
09:27:59 openstack Launchpad bug 1779287 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "placement can throw exception if webob<1.8 in use" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Sylvain Bauza (sylvain-bauza)
09:28:42 PapaOurs cdent: I'm firing a patch against nova
09:30:09 cdent you nick today is really throwing me off
09:32:04 PapaOurs cdent: it's my new friday nick
09:32:17 cdent what does it mean?
09:32:29 PapaOurs BearDad
09:33:25 cdent is this were slack I'd have to respond to that with some kind of emoji
09:33:39 cdent Anyway, I spent the whole first 3/4 of our conversation having no idea who you were
09:33:54 cdent thinking "oh cool, new downstream person coming upstream"
09:34:29 cdent so I am half sad and half happy
09:38:08 PapaOurs cdent: you can still whois me ;)
09:38:42 PapaOurs but sorry for the emotional lift :)
09:45:38 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: CLI allocation candidates (v1.10) https://review.openstack.org/514647
09:45:39 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: New dict format of allocations (v1.11, v1.12) https://review.openstack.org/542819
09:45:40 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Transactionally update allocations (v1.13) https://review.openstack.org/546674
09:45:41 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Add nested resource providers (v1.14) https://review.openstack.org/546675
09:45:42 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Limit allocation candidates (v1.15, v1.16) https://review.openstack.org/548043
09:45:43 openstackgerrit Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Allocation candidates parameter: required (v1.17) https://review.openstack.org/548326
09:46:44 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Fix placement incompatible with webob 1.7 https://review.openstack.org/579110
09:50:22 PapaOurs cdent: finucannot: efried: https://review.openstack.org/579110
09:55:48 finucannot PapaOurs: Can we not just bump the lower-constraints on that?
09:58:43 cdent finucannot: see the backlog, there's some discussion of doing both
09:58:58 cdent s/doing/trying/ and seeing which one floats
10:02:42 kaisers Hey Novas, anyone familiar with Nova+QEMU please have a look: It seems to me the change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/553072/ introduced a dependency for QEMU v2.9+ while https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtDistroSupportMatrix shows QEMU v2.5 as minimum supported version. The patch only checks for a libvirt version but not for QEMU 2.9+ . Or maybe i'm overlooking something? (QEMU v2.9 adds the pass mtu to guest fe
10:03:57 kaisers I'm not absolutely sure my 2.9 ref is the required feature but it's the best lead i found so far. Our CIs are stumbling on setting the MTU as they're running QEMU 2.5 (because Xenial release)
10:11:57 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Add InstanceGroupPolicy object https://review.openstack.org/573628
10:11:57 openstackgerrit Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor the policies to policy https://review.openstack.org/579113
10:39:23 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Define common variables for irrelevant-files https://review.openstack.org/578882
10:50:08 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: manage: Remove dead code https://review.openstack.org/579118
10:50:45 finucannot PapaOurs: Wanna send this through? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530923/
10:59:00 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Update admin/flavors document https://review.openstack.org/573063
11:18:57 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Handle LM rollback error when detaching volumes from transient domain https://review.openstack.org/579125
11:18:59 lyaaaaaaaarwood kashyap: ^ as discussed earlier, would you mind taking a look?
11:19:17 kashyap lyaaaaaaaarwood: _Just_ about to grab a quick bite
11:19:27 lyaaaaaaaarwood kashyap: ack no rush
11:20:01 kashyap Have it open in a tab. Will look.
11:20:10 lyaaaaaaaarwood thanks, enjoy lunch :)
12:19:48 tssurya mriedem, melwitt: good morning! I have replied on spec with comments on the confusions regarding delete stuff (sorry for the delay, I missed the notifications somehow).
12:20:17 tssurya if its not clear, whenever you are free later on, we could do an IRC chat
12:22:38 openstackgerrit Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Make nova service-list use scatter-gather routine https://review.openstack.org/579135
12:31:10 mriedem tssurya: ok, i'm not adequately caffeinated yet
12:32:04 tssurya mriedem: np, we can do it later in your evening as well
12:33:06 openstackgerrit Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Make nova service-list use scatter-gather routine https://review.openstack.org/579136
12:41:24 PapaOurs finucannot: re: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579110/ we can't just bump the lower version easily
12:42:05 PapaOurs finucannot: because a lot of projects use webob, and in between 1.7 and 1.8, there are some not backwards compatibilty
12:44:00 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: CLI allocation candidates (v1.10) https://review.openstack.org/514647
12:44:01 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: New dict format of allocations (v1.11, v1.12) https://review.openstack.org/542819
12:44:02 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Transactionally update allocations (v1.13) https://review.openstack.org/546674
12:44:03 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Add nested resource providers (v1.14) https://review.openstack.org/546675
12:44:04 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Limit allocation candidates (v1.15, v1.16) https://review.openstack.org/548043
12:44:05 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Allocation candidates parameter: required (v1.17) https://review.openstack.org/548326
12:45:24 mriedem we do have per-project lower constraints now for a reason
12:45:32 mriedem this doesn't need to be backported
12:45:48 mriedem i'm not sure if everyone assumes that all services on the same host are deployed in containers or venvs now though
12:46:10 mriedem we certainly don't in devstack..
12:50:34 PapaOurs mriedem: so, what's your opinion ?
12:50:52 mriedem meh
12:51:24 mriedem would probably need to talk to the requirements or release team about how they think per-project lower-constraints is meant to be handled in this case, since we don't have a common shared global-requirements anymore
12:51:48 mriedem does that mean we, as the openstack community, assert that deployments must use containers/venvs if deploying multiple different services on the same host?
12:51:56 mriedem maybe that's a question for the ML...
12:54:36 kashyap Yeah, definitely sounds like an ML topic, that can end up being KM-long thread
12:58:07 mriedem wwad
12:58:12 mriedem what would airship do
12:58:57 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Limit allocation candidates (v1.15, v1.16) https://review.openstack.org/548043
12:58:59 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Allocation candidates parameter: required (v1.17) https://review.openstack.org/548326
13:01:06 fried_rice PapaOurs: I agree with finucannot; is there some reason we can't just bump requirements and l-c?
13:01:21 giblet finucannot: quick question in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578825/1/tox.ini@3 before I approve
13:01:39 PapaOurs fried_rice: wait, lower-constraints is for all the projects
13:01:51 finucannot PapaOurs: It's per-project now
13:02:19 finucannot See the lower-constraints.txt file in root (and lower-constraints tox target)

Earlier   Later