| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-06-29 | |||
| 09:45:41 | openstackgerrit | Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Add nested resource providers (v1.14) https://review.openstack.org/546675 | |
| 09:45:42 | openstackgerrit | Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Limit allocation candidates (v1.15, v1.16) https://review.openstack.org/548043 | |
| 09:45:43 | openstackgerrit | Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Allocation candidates parameter: required (v1.17) https://review.openstack.org/548326 | |
| 09:46:44 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Fix placement incompatible with webob 1.7 https://review.openstack.org/579110 | |
| 09:50:22 | PapaOurs | cdent: finucannot: efried: https://review.openstack.org/579110 | |
| 09:55:48 | finucannot | PapaOurs: Can we not just bump the lower-constraints on that? | |
| 09:58:43 | cdent | finucannot: see the backlog, there's some discussion of doing both | |
| 09:58:58 | cdent | s/doing/trying/ and seeing which one floats | |
| 10:02:42 | kaisers | Hey Novas, anyone familiar with Nova+QEMU please have a look: It seems to me the change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/553072/ introduced a dependency for QEMU v2.9+ while https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtDistroSupportMatrix shows QEMU v2.5 as minimum supported version. The patch only checks for a libvirt version but not for QEMU 2.9+ . Or maybe i'm overlooking something? (QEMU v2.9 adds the pass mtu to guest fe | |
| 10:03:57 | kaisers | I'm not absolutely sure my 2.9 ref is the required feature but it's the best lead i found so far. Our CIs are stumbling on setting the MTU as they're running QEMU 2.5 (because Xenial release) | |
| 10:11:57 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Add InstanceGroupPolicy object https://review.openstack.org/573628 | |
| 10:11:57 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor the policies to policy https://review.openstack.org/579113 | |
| 10:39:23 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Define common variables for irrelevant-files https://review.openstack.org/578882 | |
| 10:50:08 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: manage: Remove dead code https://review.openstack.org/579118 | |
| 10:50:45 | finucannot | PapaOurs: Wanna send this through? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530923/ | |
| 10:59:00 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Update admin/flavors document https://review.openstack.org/573063 | |
| 11:18:57 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Handle LM rollback error when detaching volumes from transient domain https://review.openstack.org/579125 | |
| 11:18:59 | lyaaaaaaaarwood | kashyap: ^ as discussed earlier, would you mind taking a look? | |
| 11:19:17 | kashyap | lyaaaaaaaarwood: _Just_ about to grab a quick bite | |
| 11:19:27 | lyaaaaaaaarwood | kashyap: ack no rush | |
| 11:20:01 | kashyap | Have it open in a tab. Will look. | |
| 11:20:10 | lyaaaaaaaarwood | thanks, enjoy lunch :) | |
| 12:19:48 | tssurya | mriedem, melwitt: good morning! I have replied on spec with comments on the confusions regarding delete stuff (sorry for the delay, I missed the notifications somehow). | |
| 12:20:17 | tssurya | if its not clear, whenever you are free later on, we could do an IRC chat | |
| 12:22:38 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Make nova service-list use scatter-gather routine https://review.openstack.org/579135 | |
| 12:31:10 | mriedem | tssurya: ok, i'm not adequately caffeinated yet | |
| 12:32:04 | tssurya | mriedem: np, we can do it later in your evening as well | |
| 12:33:06 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Make nova service-list use scatter-gather routine https://review.openstack.org/579136 | |
| 12:41:24 | PapaOurs | finucannot: re: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579110/ we can't just bump the lower version easily | |
| 12:42:05 | PapaOurs | finucannot: because a lot of projects use webob, and in between 1.7 and 1.8, there are some not backwards compatibilty | |
| 12:44:00 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: CLI allocation candidates (v1.10) https://review.openstack.org/514647 | |
| 12:44:01 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: New dict format of allocations (v1.11, v1.12) https://review.openstack.org/542819 | |
| 12:44:02 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Transactionally update allocations (v1.13) https://review.openstack.org/546674 | |
| 12:44:03 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Add nested resource providers (v1.14) https://review.openstack.org/546675 | |
| 12:44:04 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Limit allocation candidates (v1.15, v1.16) https://review.openstack.org/548043 | |
| 12:44:05 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Allocation candidates parameter: required (v1.17) https://review.openstack.org/548326 | |
| 12:45:24 | mriedem | we do have per-project lower constraints now for a reason | |
| 12:45:32 | mriedem | this doesn't need to be backported | |
| 12:45:48 | mriedem | i'm not sure if everyone assumes that all services on the same host are deployed in containers or venvs now though | |
| 12:46:10 | mriedem | we certainly don't in devstack.. | |
| 12:50:34 | PapaOurs | mriedem: so, what's your opinion ? | |
| 12:50:52 | mriedem | meh | |
| 12:51:24 | mriedem | would probably need to talk to the requirements or release team about how they think per-project lower-constraints is meant to be handled in this case, since we don't have a common shared global-requirements anymore | |
| 12:51:48 | mriedem | does that mean we, as the openstack community, assert that deployments must use containers/venvs if deploying multiple different services on the same host? | |
| 12:51:56 | mriedem | maybe that's a question for the ML... | |
| 12:54:36 | kashyap | Yeah, definitely sounds like an ML topic, that can end up being KM-long thread | |
| 12:58:07 | mriedem | wwad | |
| 12:58:12 | mriedem | what would airship do | |
| 12:58:57 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Limit allocation candidates (v1.15, v1.16) https://review.openstack.org/548043 | |
| 12:58:59 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Allocation candidates parameter: required (v1.17) https://review.openstack.org/548326 | |
| 13:01:06 | fried_rice | PapaOurs: I agree with finucannot; is there some reason we can't just bump requirements and l-c? | |
| 13:01:21 | giblet | finucannot: quick question in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578825/1/tox.ini@3 before I approve | |
| 13:01:39 | PapaOurs | fried_rice: wait, lower-constraints is for all the projects | |
| 13:01:51 | finucannot | PapaOurs: It's per-project now | |
| 13:02:19 | finucannot | See the lower-constraints.txt file in root (and lower-constraints tox target) | |
| 13:03:06 | finucannot | giblet: Nope. That's a hangover from a previous rebase, I imagine. It's harmless but I can edit and switch it back if you'd like? | |
| 13:03:32 | giblet | finucannot: no need to change it back, I was just curious | |
| 13:03:35 | giblet | finucannot: approving | |
| 13:03:37 | PapaOurs | finucannot: so, we should bump it for nova ? | |
| 13:03:56 | fried_rice | giblet: I answered at least why it was reversed to begin with. | |
| 13:04:00 | fried_rice | PapaOurs: Yes | |
| 13:04:21 | finucannot | fried_rice: Ah, correct | |
| 13:04:24 | fried_rice | PapaOurs: You'll need to do it in both requirements.txt and lower-constraints.txt | |
| 13:04:31 | giblet | fried_rice: thanks | |
| 13:05:40 | finucannot | PapaOurs: Yeah, that was the idea behind moving those things in-tree, I thought | |
| 13:06:34 | giblet | fried_rice: I opened https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560317/17/nova/tests/functional/libvirt/test_report_cpu_traits.py but at a first glance I don't know the answer of the failure. | |
| 13:06:50 | giblet | fried_rice: I can try to dig on Monday | |
| 13:07:11 | fried_rice | giblet: What was the patch you got into recently where it was something to do with creating or deleting a file on the file system, and that raced among several tests? | |
| 13:08:14 | fried_rice | If you can just point me at that, I can look into it. Cause I suspect the failure is the same or similar. Or at least worth eliminating as a suspect. | |
| 13:08:33 | giblet | fried_rice: that wasn't my patch but I try to find it as now I remember what you are referring to | |
| 13:08:51 | fried_rice | giblet: Right, I remember you swooped in and saved the day | |
| 13:09:40 | cdent | he has a habit of doing that | |
| 13:10:05 | fried_rice | Heh, I misread, at first I thought you were saying *you* have a habit of doing that. | |
| 13:10:26 | fried_rice | i.e. a habit of picturing giblet in a cape. | |
| 13:10:44 | giblet | :) | |
| 13:10:47 | cdent | don't share my secrets in public, please | |
| 13:16:00 | giblet | fried_rice: is the one? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560459/16 | |
| 13:16:12 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: [placement] Extract create_allocation_list https://review.openstack.org/577200 | |
| 13:16:21 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: [placement] Fix capacity tracking in POST /allocations https://review.openstack.org/578133 | |
| 13:16:22 | giblet | fried_rice: here the CONF.instance_path was the root cause | |
| 13:17:06 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add missing encryption_secret_uuid tests for pre_live_migration https://review.openstack.org/540679 | |
| 13:17:24 | giblet | http://logs.openstack.org/59/560459/16/gate/nova-tox-functional/c04cbeb/testr_results.html.gz | |
| 13:19:40 | fried_rice | giblet: Yeah, yeah, doesn't that look pretty much identical? | |
| 13:19:50 | giblet | fried_rice: yeah it does | |
| 13:20:19 | giblet | fried_rice: so something is missing from the filesystem the test depends on | |
| 13:22:02 | mriedem | tssurya: replied inline on the spec, i think we're on the same page | |
| 13:22:16 | fried_rice | giblet: In the other patch, the solution was | |
| 13:22:16 | fried_rice | self.useFixture( | |
| 13:22:16 | fried_rice | fixtures.MockPatch('nova.virt.libvirt.utils.get_fs_info')) | |
| 13:23:08 | tssurya | mriedem: FYI regarding backporting https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578152/ to Pike, just realized that Pike is way behind in listing , it doesn't have https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/bac8f5b046283fbc641d418443e5b899f2989fdf#diff-41e6d0ef0ef79d44593ee0f1b241f9f4 | |
| 13:23:31 | giblet | fried_rice: yeah, the current patch hits that function as well | |
| 13:23:35 | tssurya | so will stop at queens which is already merged. | |
| 13:23:57 | giblet | fried_rice: either the same mock is needed here or we should globally mock the get_fs_info in a fixture | |
| 13:24:20 | giblet | giblet: I would suggest the later as we hit this issue twice in a short time | |
| 13:24:42 | fried_rice | giblet: I agree, but maybe not in this patch? | |
| 13:24:57 | giblet | fried_rice: doing the fixture work in a followup is fine by me | |
| 13:25:18 | giblet | fried_rice: just add a the mock to make the test stable now | |
| 13:26:28 | fried_rice | ++ Thanks for the help, giblet | |
| 13:27:06 | giblet | fried_rice: I'm happy that I could help | |
| 13:30:02 | PapaOurs | cdent: which webob version should be lower for nova ? 1.8.2 ? | |