| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-04-17 | |||
| 03:30:54 | openstackgerrit | Nguyen Hai proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Follow the new PTI for document build https://review.openstack.org/551802 | |
| 03:57:54 | jichen | melwitt: hi regarding your comments in the ML about z/VM driver | |
| 03:59:21 | jichen | melwitt: the z/VM driver behaves unlike any other in-tree driver [0-5] ---> we will make our code exactly as you pointed , we will NOT do anything special | |
| 04:14:03 | openstackgerrit | Nguyen Hai proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Follow the new PTI for document build https://review.openstack.org/551802 | |
| 04:24:50 | openstackgerrit | Nguyen Hai proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Follow the new PTI for document build https://review.openstack.org/551802 | |
| 06:20:24 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: remove ec2 in service and cmd https://review.openstack.org/556778 | |
| 06:53:04 | openstackgerrit | Naichuan Sun proposed openstack/nova master: xenapi: Use XAPI pool instead of aggregate pool for shared SR migration https://review.openstack.org/554154 | |
| 06:57:02 | gokhan | hi , I have HA openstack pike environment. for 2 weeks there is not any problem about environment, but for 2 days I am getting rabbitmq timeout errors on some compute nodes. there are errors on nova compute and rabbitmq cluster. on nova compute there are timeouts errors like that : http://paste.openstack.org/show/719338/ and I see on rabbitmq there are error reports like that: http://paste.openstack.org/show/719339/ what can be the reason of this a | |
| 06:57:02 | gokhan | nd how can I solve this problem ? now I can not create multiple instances and some instances are waiting in build statement for hours | |
| 07:16:57 | Kevin_Zheng | gibi Hi, could you check this series https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:refactor-notification-samples | |
| 07:17:35 | gibi | Kevin_Zheng: Hi! It is in my queue. Thanks for working on it | |
| 07:18:20 | Kevin_Zheng | gibi, Thanks, it is related to the bp I working on anyway :) | |
| 07:44:43 | alex_xu | gmann: pong | |
| 07:45:30 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] ServerActionsSampleJsonTest refactor https://review.openstack.org/561819 | |
| 07:47:50 | gmann | alex_xu: could not catch you since long. i want to discuss about API meeting or office hour | |
| 07:48:09 | alex_xu | gmann: yea | |
| 07:48:32 | gmann | alex_xu: idea is we continue on that and do mainly 2 things 1. we track priority items mainly for review and 2. do bug triage | |
| 07:48:56 | alex_xu | gmann: I think it is cool | |
| 07:50:05 | alex_xu | gmann: what time we choice? | |
| 07:50:51 | gmann | alex_xu: not decided actually. i feel may be during our day time as not much people attended past API meeting | |
| 07:51:02 | alex_xu | yes | |
| 07:51:18 | alex_xu | gmann: and if there is trouble problem we can bring it to the nova weekly meeting | |
| 07:51:24 | gmann | alex_xu: and i can send a summary of updates every week after that | |
| 07:51:36 | alex_xu | gmann: that will be cool | |
| 07:51:39 | gmann | alex_xu: yes, we give same updated there too | |
| 07:53:17 | alex_xu | gmann: should we start a email to ask abot the idea first? | |
| 07:53:43 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: jaypipes sahid i was talking to dansmith about the native vhost-user support in the libvirt driver yesterday, do you have any objection to me moving this to os-vif as an in tree plugin? the impmentation in os-vif will effectivly be an no-op but it means we can remove that code path from nova. the nataiv vhost-user support is used by snab switch, vpp and i belive it was used by contrail at | |
| 07:53:43 | gmann | alex_xu: sure. that will be good and if we get more people join that | |
| 07:53:45 | sean-k-mooney | one point. | |
| 07:54:05 | alex_xu | gmann: yea, can you start a email :) | |
| 07:54:33 | gmann | alex_xu: yea, i will send tomorrow and get the opinion on idea and time also | |
| 07:54:45 | alex_xu | gmann: cool, thanks a lot | |
| 07:54:47 | gmann | alex_xu: thanks :) | |
| 07:59:01 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: jaypipes sahid. as the native support is used by multiple drivers and since it is always expected to be present in existing installs keeping it in os-vif makes sense from an upgrade point of view as packagers do not need to include an addtional package to maintain current behavior | |
| 08:02:14 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: jaypipes sahid i have created a bug to track this https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-vif/+bug/1764665 but if ye have objections let me know and i can take a different path | |
| 08:02:14 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1764665 in os-vif "Add generic-vhost-user pluging to os-vif" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to sean mooney (sean-k-mooney) | |
| 08:06:42 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: ServerActionsSampleJsonTest refactor https://review.openstack.org/561819 | |
| 08:11:05 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Initial change set of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/523387 | |
| 08:11:06 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Spawn and destroy function of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/527658 | |
| 08:11:07 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add snapshot function https://review.openstack.org/534240 | |
| 08:11:08 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add power actions https://review.openstack.org/543340 | |
| 08:11:09 | openstackgerrit | jichenjc proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: add get console output https://review.openstack.org/543344 | |
| 08:26:54 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: add support for virtio-net rx/tx queue sizes https://review.openstack.org/484997 | |
| 08:27:44 | sahid | sean-k-mooney: i just updated the patch | |
| 08:28:10 | sahid | if you can have a look. I really would like limiting the scope of the change if possible | |
| 08:28:15 | sahid | i added some comments | |
| 08:28:23 | sean-k-mooney | sahid: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/484997 ? | |
| 08:28:38 | sahid | yes | |
| 08:29:28 | sahid | sean-k-mooney: about your ovs-vif asking | |
| 08:29:42 | sahid | so you want to create an other pluging in the tree for vhostuser? | |
| 08:30:02 | sean-k-mooney | sahid: specifically for vhost user when not using ovs | |
| 08:30:46 | sean-k-mooney | the plug an unplug methods will be no ops as in the non ovs case nova/os-vif does not need to plug the vhost-user interface into anything | |
| 08:31:19 | sahid | but we will still have to keep the nova part to generate the native domain xml | |
| 08:31:20 | sean-k-mooney | it will however allow use to remove the fallback code in the nova/virt/libvirt/vif.py | |
| 08:31:53 | sean-k-mooney | sahid: yes just the xml generation but that is comon between ovs and non ovs vhost-user interfaces | |
| 08:32:11 | sahid | right, so i'm cool with you plan :) | |
| 08:32:12 | sean-k-mooney | currently we have that twice in the nova tree but we can converge them | |
| 08:33:10 | sahid | yes if we can remove 'get_config_vhost' to ony user the ovsvif one that would be perfect | |
| 08:33:22 | sahid | get_config_vhostuser | |
| 08:37:07 | sean-k-mooney | sahid: ya we would remove the get_config_vhostuser fucntion and then always use the os-vif version instead. im going to try and set up a vpp test env later this week so i can validate it all still works correctly. | |
| 08:40:54 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Add host/hostId to instance action events API https://review.openstack.org/557145 | |
| 08:46:46 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Document how to disable notifications https://review.openstack.org/561684 | |
| 09:09:29 | kholkina | hi! could you please review the spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/547964/ | |
| 09:14:16 | naichuans | jaypipes: Hi, Jay. For a resource provider(n-rp enabled) which have alreay allocate some resources to a living VM, can we delete it? I'm considering a case on n-rp for vGPU: 1) vGPU resource provider created 2) create a VM with vGPU 3) disable vGPU support by remove enabled_vgpu_types in nova.conf 4) update host states, then vGPU rp should be deleted(cache on nova side and data in placement database)? 5) enable vGPU support again by | |
| 09:14:16 | naichuans | enabled_vgpu_types. Would the process affect the after going VM schedule? | |
| 09:18:09 | openstackgerrit | Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: Consider nested RPs in get_all_with_shared https://review.openstack.org/556450 | |
| 09:18:10 | openstackgerrit | Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: Support shared and nested allocation candidates https://review.openstack.org/556514 | |
| 09:18:11 | openstackgerrit | Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: Support nested alloc cands without shared RPs https://review.openstack.org/561842 | |
| 09:27:59 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove mox in unit/virt/xenapi/test_vmops.py https://review.openstack.org/561846 | |
| 09:33:57 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Avoid showing password in log https://review.openstack.org/561850 | |
| 09:34:20 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/ocata: Avoid showing password in log https://review.openstack.org/561851 | |
| 09:44:27 | lyarwood | mdbooth: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561704/ - morning, I dumped this in your review queue btw | |
| 09:47:50 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Improve performance when list instances with IP filter https://review.openstack.org/539469 | |
| 09:49:49 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.61 - support extra_specs in flavor API https://review.openstack.org/561520 | |
| 09:53:17 | openstackgerrit | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/ocata: Functional test for regression bug #1713783 https://review.openstack.org/505160 | |
| 09:53:17 | openstack | bug 1713783 in OpenStack Compute (nova) ocata "After failed evacuation the recovered source compute tries to delete the instance" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1713783 - Assigned to Illes Elod (elod-illes) | |
| 10:01:14 | openstackgerrit | Lei Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Improve check capacity sql https://review.openstack.org/561862 | |
| 10:14:08 | kashyap | mdbooth, I'm afraid, on that Mox discussion yesterda, I don't see any other choice than replacing the failing Mox test with Mock | |
| 10:14:12 | kashyap | Oh, he's not here | |
| 10:30:39 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Skip placement on rebuild in same host https://review.openstack.org/561015 | |
| 10:38:36 | openstackgerrit | sahid proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: add support for virtio-net rx/tx queue sizes https://review.openstack.org/484997 | |
| 10:38:51 | sahid | sean-k-mooney: ^ I preferd to fix the test | |
| 10:39:30 | sean-k-mooney | sahid: cool :) as i said it was only a minor nit but it nice to use valid values in the tests | |
| 10:40:57 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: List/show all server migration types (1/2) https://review.openstack.org/430608 | |
| 10:40:58 | sahid | sean-k-mooney: yes yes, just i think we should try to stay coherent even in tests :) | |
| 10:41:06 | sahid | it was a good point | |
| 10:41:10 | kashyap | stephenfin: Hi there. Is it too unreasonable to replace Mox with Mock, while fixing the fallout from libvirt / QEMU version bump: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/0001-tests-unit-Fix-test_live_migration_update_graphics_x.patch | |
| 10:41:41 | kashyap | stephenfin: When you can, read the commit message, and the first point in the "main changes". | |
| 10:42:04 | sahid | sean-k-mooney: about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/553072/ | |
| 10:42:10 | stephenfin | kashyap: I personally think that's fine, given that the test was having issues as is | |
| 10:42:18 | kashyap | Yeah, thank you! | |
| 10:42:27 | sahid | matt had some questions, i tried to reply but perhaps you want to give more details | |
| 10:42:31 | kashyap | stephenfin: I spent 2 hours fixing two tests. I'm slow as molasses with this stuff | |
| 10:42:34 | kashyap | Thanks | |
| 10:43:18 | stephenfin | bauzas: Did I hear something about us deprecating AggregateCoreFilter ? | |
| 10:43:40 | bauzas | stephenfin: hola, sorry saw your late ping | |
| 10:43:46 | bauzas | stephenfin: but I was running :p | |
| 10:43:54 | stephenfin | bauzas: All good :) | |
| 10:44:10 | bauzas | stephenfin: the aggregate filters ? well, it's a long story :) | |
| 10:45:11 | bauzas | stephenfin: AFAIK, the aggregate filters aren't deprecated *yet* | |