Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-02-15
16:53:16 bauzas dansmith: we could persist that, but we shouldn't use that value on a later reschedule but rather recalculate it
16:53:31 bauzas that being a per-filter policy
16:53:33 dansmith bauzas: depends
16:53:35 dansmith yeah
16:53:37 dansmith I will reply
16:53:41 bauzas cool
16:53:44 bauzas one last point
16:53:46 bauzas but it's a nit
16:53:54 bauzas I'm poor at wording
16:54:08 bauzas but I'm afraid the word "filter" carries a lot of context
16:54:27 bauzas so I'd prefer to use a synonym for that mechanism
16:54:33 bauzas I know it's sneaky
16:54:50 bauzas so feel free to NACK me
16:54:52 dansmith bauzas: it's not exposed as a filter to the user or admin at all
16:55:06 dansmith bauzas: so we can change it either now or later if it becomes a problem
16:55:19 bauzas yeah it's just wording
16:55:26 dansmith but, IMHO, it's not a big enough deal to rename the things I have already :)
16:55:31 bauzas like we have nova aggs and placement aggs
16:55:41 bauzas dansmith: not requiring a respin of your spec
16:55:57 bauzas dansmith: but maybe we should consider that in your series :)
16:56:13 dansmith bauzas: well feel free to take exception to it in the code if you still feel that way yeah
16:56:16 bauzas scheduler filters and request filters seem very identical to me in terms
16:56:51 bauzas again, it's maybe me overreacting on some blueprints I could see in the future
16:57:07 dansmith what word do you like better?
16:57:10 openstackgerrit Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to configure amount of PCIe slots in aarch64 instance https://review.openstack.org/545034
16:57:28 hrw cna someone take a look at that patch? mriedem stephenfin bauzas?
16:57:40 bauzas dansmith: from a French folk, the Thesaurus tells me "strain"
16:57:54 dansmith lol
16:57:55 bauzas but anyway, I feel ashamed of nitpicking on that
16:58:06 dansmith that would make no sense to an english speaker
16:58:18 bauzas the history of nova told me that there are 3 NP problems
16:58:26 bauzas distibuted locks
16:58:36 bauzas NFV
16:58:41 bauzas or BFV even
16:58:44 bauzas and naming things
16:59:00 bauzas naming a new thing requires 3 cycles at least
16:59:21 bauzas in order to get consensus
16:59:37 bauzas so, anyway, let's just pretend I never asked for that
16:59:46 dansmith bauzas: as the only one who has (thus far) taken exception with the name, it's funny for you to be complaining about that :)
17:00:11 bauzas I know, hence my apologies
17:00:22 bauzas let's pretend that discussion never existed
17:00:35 bauzas (17:57:55) bauzas: but anyway, I feel ashamed of nitpicking on that
17:02:12 mriedem hrw: busy atm, can you mark that WIP if it's the initial version w/o tests?
17:02:19 hrw mriedem: ok
17:02:56 hrw W-1
17:04:27 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Don't JSON encode instance_info.traits for ironic https://review.openstack.org/543574
17:04:44 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Python 3 fix for sphinx doc https://review.openstack.org/544956
17:05:51 mriedem ameeda: i think you're missing a unit test in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528385/
17:06:18 mriedem otherwise i think that's mostly ok, outside of the commit message cleanup
17:06:27 openstackgerrit Mark Goddard proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Don't JSON encode instance_info.traits for ironic https://review.openstack.org/545037
17:22:14 mriedem stephenfin: i don't know what people want in here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/544015/
17:22:37 bauzas mriedem: dansmith: edleafe: cdent: I'm about to +W https://review.openstack.org/#/c/544585/
17:22:46 bauzas if anyone has concerns, that's the moment
17:22:58 bauzas oops, jaypipes too ^
17:23:57 dansmith my only concern would be the dependent specs, if people want those landed first
17:24:01 dansmith but I don't mind either way really
17:24:55 stephenfin mriedem: I think you identified what he was looking for, which was different to what I thought. Given that the caching scheduler is deprecated (I didn't know that), we don't need to worry about IMO
17:25:42 mriedem bauzas: it is certainly possible to know if we're doing a first schedule or a reschedule,
17:25:48 mriedem RequestSpec.retry has that information
17:26:00 bauzas mriedem: for a reschedule yes
17:26:05 bauzas mriedem: for a move operation, nope
17:26:08 edleafe bauzas: that's cool. At least there has been some discussion since my comment
17:26:11 mriedem bauzas: that's because https://review.openstack.org/#/c/505771/
17:26:49 mriedem well, the issue in ^ confuses the fact that you're doing a reschedule or a move
17:26:57 bauzas shit
17:27:26 bauzas how many times will I regret to not have thought more on persisted fields for the RequestSpec object ?
17:27:47 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Cleans up allocations after failed resize https://review.openstack.org/543971
17:27:57 jaypipes bauzas: hold please.
17:27:58 cdent bauzas: feel free to +w the spec if there's been enough feedback
17:28:00 jaypipes still reviewing
17:28:01 mriedem i thought that would be an easy fix but then second guessed myself, and need to write a functional test to be sure
17:28:07 cdent bauzas: except for jay :)
17:28:26 bauzas jaypipes: ack
17:29:52 efried Could rebase it on top of the other spec
17:31:29 dansmith or someone could slam it in: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/544694/
17:31:42 dansmith it's really simple, has a lot of +1s from stakeholders and only needs a +W
17:31:50 mriedem looking
17:32:04 mriedem i will ram this down your throat like obamacare to the republicans
17:32:18 mriedem lemme call nancy quick
17:32:25 dansmith lolol
17:33:01 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova-specs master: mirror nova host aggregates to placement API https://review.openstack.org/545057
17:34:21 dansmith apparently by "lots" I meant "two" but.. you know
17:34:53 mriedem consider it rammed
17:35:03 mriedem thanks obama
17:35:19 mriedem the two that matter
17:38:51 jaypipes dansmith: cern doesn't use the cachingscheduler does it?
17:39:08 mriedem tssurya: ^
17:39:24 dansmith jaypipes: presumably not because they're working through placement issues right now
17:39:34 jaypipes ak
17:40:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Support member_of param for allocation candidates https://review.openstack.org/544694
17:42:05 tssurya mriedem, jaypipes, dansmith : no we don't
17:42:25 mriedem excellente
17:47:19 gibi dansmith: I also left some comments / questions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/544585 just now
17:51:39 openstackgerrit Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova master: Extending delete_cell --force to delete instance_mappings https://review.openstack.org/540073
17:52:54 bauzas gibi: dansmith: I got the name. Let's call it "scheduler transformers" and name the first one "autobot"
17:53:07 dansmith gibi: replying
17:53:08 mriedem gibi: i cleaned up the commit message on this and added a simple unit test for detach failing, see if you still like it ^
17:53:09 mriedem oops
17:53:13 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Detach volumes when VM creation fails https://review.openstack.org/528385
17:53:15 mriedem gibi: ^

Earlier   Later