Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-07-19
17:23:53 mriedem in there ^
17:24:02 mriedem the last reservable resource was instances,
17:24:13 mriedem and that change changes instnaces from a reservable resource to a countable resource
17:24:15 melwitt I don't understand how we're not using it, we're just correctly saying it's zero
17:24:17 mriedem hence reserved is no longer used
17:24:33 mriedem melwitt: i think he's asking which change made reserved vestigial
17:24:37 melwitt instead of letting it potentially show old unused reservations
17:24:41 mriedem it's this gd beast https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416521/63/nova/quota.py
17:24:41 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Correct the description of 'disable-log-reason' api-ref https://review.openstack.org/480209
17:24:43 melwitt oh
17:25:17 bauzas yeah just saw https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416521/63/nova/quota.py@139
17:25:43 bauzas melwitt: yeah, what mriedem said
17:26:02 melwitt I guess we could leave it there and it would still be 0 because in nova/quota.py reserved is hardcoded to 0
17:26:03 bauzas melwitt: I just wondered when we began ignoring that API flag
17:26:25 bauzas I'm definitely not a quota expert :(
17:27:10 melwitt with each resource change from ReservableResource -> CountableResource in nova/quota.py we return reserved=0 for that resource since reserving is no longer possible
17:28:54 bauzas anyway, time to bail out \o
17:31:09 melwitt bah, counting instances failed in the gate on yet another unrelated func test "Authentication error"
17:31:28 dansmith well if someting in front of it fails that test it'll get another go
17:31:51 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Update URL home-page in documents according to document migration https://review.openstack.org/483757
17:32:02 melwitt oooh
17:32:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Do not mention that tags are case sensitive in docs https://review.openstack.org/484957
17:33:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: XenAPI: Fix ValueError in test_slave_asks_master_to_add_slave_to_pool https://review.openstack.org/484201
17:34:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Convert HostState.limits['numa_topology'] to primitive https://review.openstack.org/484439
17:35:13 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: api-ref: fix max_version for deprecated os-quota-class-sets parameters https://review.openstack.org/484952
17:35:42 dansmith okay not likely now :)
17:39:38 mriedem at least your patch got into the gate,
17:39:45 mriedem i can't get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/464280/ out of check queue purgatory
17:40:15 melwitt true.
17:45:41 bbansal Hello All, anyone here can help me : how can I disable genration of n-dhcp logs ?
17:49:03 efried bbansal symlink it to /dev/null?
17:49:17 efried bbansal Set the log level to CRITICAL?
17:50:54 bbansal I have devstack running as a part of CI. It generates n-dhcp log and its a symlink. At the end of the process, when we are trying to copy it to our ftp server, it fails because there is no such file there
17:51:33 mriedem you mean q-dhcp?
17:51:53 bbansal i am looking for n-dhcp
17:51:58 bbansal q-dhcp logs are fine
17:52:04 mriedem there is no n-dhcp
17:52:15 bbansal n-dhcp.log -> n-dhcp.log.2017-07-18-233804
17:52:21 bbansal it generates like this
17:53:01 bbansal i can see these logs in my logs directory
17:53:53 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: WIP - Migrate Ironic Flavors https://review.openstack.org/484949
17:54:21 bbansal mriedem: any insights>
17:54:22 bbansal ?
17:55:14 mriedem there is no n-dhcp in devstack
17:55:15 mriedem on master
17:55:34 mriedem oh hold on
17:56:01 bbansal sure
17:56:12 mriedem i see it
17:56:36 mriedem https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/lib/nova#L544-L554
17:57:04 mriedem that should only be for running nova-network i think
17:57:06 mriedem sdague: ^?
17:57:27 bbansal yeah and we dont need these and currently they are failing our builds somehow even if all tempest cases are passing
17:58:19 mriedem yeah it's a bug in devstack, it shouldn't be running that if you're using neutron
17:59:20 mriedem i'll push a change
18:00:23 sdague mriedem: looking
18:01:27 bbansal ok thanks
18:02:14 sdague mriedem: yeh, probably. It doesn't hurt anything because it's a zero length file
18:02:15 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Remove useless quota_usage_refresh from nova-manage https://review.openstack.org/446243
18:02:20 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Make Quotas object favor the API database https://review.openstack.org/410945
18:02:22 sdague but, yeh, it shouldn't be there
18:02:24 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add online migration to move quotas to API database https://review.openstack.org/410946
18:02:35 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate Ironic Flavors https://review.openstack.org/484949
18:03:26 sdague mriedem: on things like this change, is this sufficient release notes - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386008/9/releasenotes/notes/quota-show-detail-access-d6f37282d288fa33.yaml ?
18:03:36 sdague I wasn't sure what our standard model is for policy changes
18:04:34 mriedem bbansal: sdague: https://review.openstack.org/485300
18:04:45 mriedem sdague: i guess without ^ the 0 length file kills their ftp server
18:05:35 mriedem sdague: its not sufficient imo
18:05:35 mriedem -
18:05:36 mriedem -1
18:06:12 mriedem sdague: we don't really have a standard model for that, but "we changed something, you figure it out" is probably not good enough :)
18:06:35 bbansal thanks mriedem
18:06:41 bbansal what will be the ETA for this to get merged?
18:07:16 sdague bbansal: my guess, a couple of days, it needs test runs and a second reviewer
18:07:47 bbansal ok thanks a lot. I can have a temp fix so that my build can pass and then once it gets merged, will give another test run
18:07:54 bbansal clear
18:08:08 sdague bbansal: how was it making your tests fail?
18:08:48 bbansal Its not making the test fails but at the end as a part of our CI we are publishing reports and logs to our ftp server and since it was a blank file out jenkins build got unstable
18:09:05 bbansal as it tried to copy this and there were no such file present
18:12:44 sdague bbansal: ah, gotcha
18:22:31 openstackgerrit Jan Gutter proposed openstack/nova master: Netronome SmartNIC Enablement https://review.openstack.org/483459
18:29:07 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.52 - Support tag when boot https://review.openstack.org/484617
18:29:50 cdent jaypipes: i gotta dash, but ought to be later if you wanna chat about that weirdness gibi uncovered
18:30:37 mriedem sdague: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/484617/ should be good to go
18:35:24 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: stephenfin mriedem: o/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485304 is the review for the new os-vif release. we still need to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485125 but it has been rebased on master so the commit id will not change.
18:35:40 sdague mriedem: looking
18:36:08 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: I'm going to make those little nit corrections I just dinged jangutter for since I think jangutter is afk
18:36:09 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: did you forget to save the suggestions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485125/
18:36:15 sdague mriedem: that's a fun new 3.5 minute test in tempest I noticed
18:36:18 mriedem sean-k-mooney: merge commit?
18:36:18 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: no...
18:36:27 mriedem sdague: what's fun
18:36:27 mriedem ?
18:36:32 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: just got delayed :)
18:36:45 sdague mriedem: build 3 volumes and 2 networks and plug plug plug
18:36:50 jangutter jaypipes, sean-k-mooney: jangutter is not afk, but operating at about 20% caffeine.
18:36:50 sdague for 3+ minutes
18:36:57 mriedem sdague: did i add it?
18:37:08 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: i dont see them in gerrit i assume you were talking to him on irc
18:37:20 sdague mriedem: I don't know, I was just trying to figure out why we were close to 2 hours on runs, and that one jumped out as long and new
18:37:25 sdague I didn't look at the authorship

Earlier   Later