Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-07-19
18:02:15 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Remove useless quota_usage_refresh from nova-manage https://review.openstack.org/446243
18:02:20 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Make Quotas object favor the API database https://review.openstack.org/410945
18:02:22 sdague but, yeh, it shouldn't be there
18:02:24 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add online migration to move quotas to API database https://review.openstack.org/410946
18:02:35 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Migrate Ironic Flavors https://review.openstack.org/484949
18:03:26 sdague mriedem: on things like this change, is this sufficient release notes - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386008/9/releasenotes/notes/quota-show-detail-access-d6f37282d288fa33.yaml ?
18:03:36 sdague I wasn't sure what our standard model is for policy changes
18:04:34 mriedem bbansal: sdague: https://review.openstack.org/485300
18:04:45 mriedem sdague: i guess without ^ the 0 length file kills their ftp server
18:05:35 mriedem sdague: its not sufficient imo
18:05:35 mriedem -
18:05:36 mriedem -1
18:06:12 mriedem sdague: we don't really have a standard model for that, but "we changed something, you figure it out" is probably not good enough :)
18:06:35 bbansal thanks mriedem
18:06:41 bbansal what will be the ETA for this to get merged?
18:07:16 sdague bbansal: my guess, a couple of days, it needs test runs and a second reviewer
18:07:47 bbansal ok thanks a lot. I can have a temp fix so that my build can pass and then once it gets merged, will give another test run
18:07:54 bbansal clear
18:08:08 sdague bbansal: how was it making your tests fail?
18:08:48 bbansal Its not making the test fails but at the end as a part of our CI we are publishing reports and logs to our ftp server and since it was a blank file out jenkins build got unstable
18:09:05 bbansal as it tried to copy this and there were no such file present
18:12:44 sdague bbansal: ah, gotcha
18:22:31 openstackgerrit Jan Gutter proposed openstack/nova master: Netronome SmartNIC Enablement https://review.openstack.org/483459
18:29:07 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.52 - Support tag when boot https://review.openstack.org/484617
18:29:50 cdent jaypipes: i gotta dash, but ought to be later if you wanna chat about that weirdness gibi uncovered
18:30:37 mriedem sdague: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/484617/ should be good to go
18:35:24 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: stephenfin mriedem: o/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485304 is the review for the new os-vif release. we still need to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485125 but it has been rebased on master so the commit id will not change.
18:35:40 sdague mriedem: looking
18:36:08 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: I'm going to make those little nit corrections I just dinged jangutter for since I think jangutter is afk
18:36:09 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: did you forget to save the suggestions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485125/
18:36:15 sdague mriedem: that's a fun new 3.5 minute test in tempest I noticed
18:36:18 mriedem sean-k-mooney: merge commit?
18:36:18 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: no...
18:36:27 mriedem sdague: what's fun
18:36:27 mriedem ?
18:36:32 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: just got delayed :)
18:36:45 sdague mriedem: build 3 volumes and 2 networks and plug plug plug
18:36:50 jangutter jaypipes, sean-k-mooney: jangutter is not afk, but operating at about 20% caffeine.
18:36:50 sdague for 3+ minutes
18:36:57 mriedem sdague: did i add it?
18:37:08 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: i dont see them in gerrit i assume you were talking to him on irc
18:37:20 sdague mriedem: I don't know, I was just trying to figure out why we were close to 2 hours on runs, and that one jumped out as long and new
18:37:25 sdague I didn't look at the authorship
18:37:36 mriedem ok, your context switch from server tags to that threw me off
18:37:47 mriedem i killed a spider on my porch
18:37:51 mriedem and it's babies
18:38:00 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: guh, was on a prior revision. :(
18:38:02 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: sec
18:38:08 sean-k-mooney mriedem: i had asked jangutter to rebase on master so the that commit id would not change and i would not have to update the sha in the commit to the release repo.
18:38:12 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: no worries
18:39:15 mriedem sean-k-mooney: if it's got new features and stuff it should be a minor version bump
18:39:51 sean-k-mooney mriedem: i could bump to 1.7 but the bump to 1.6 was mainly for the hardware offload feature
18:40:12 sean-k-mooney 1.6.1 was just removing some vendor specific assumtions but more or less the same
18:40:31 mriedem sean-k-mooney: there is a new feature in there, and there is a new min bump on some dependencies
18:40:34 mriedem so it's 1.7
18:40:35 mriedem or bust
18:40:44 mriedem +oslo.config!=4.3.0,!=4.4.0,>=4.0.0 # Apache-2.0
18:41:05 sean-k-mooney mriedem: ill have to respin the patch any when jaypipes or jangutter respins so cool ill make it 1.7.0
18:41:29 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: one sec. pushing now.
18:41:40 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/os-vif master: Improve OVS Representor VF Lookup https://review.openstack.org/485125
18:41:45 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: ^
18:41:59 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: cool thanks jay
18:42:53 jangutter sean-k-mooney, jaypipes: thanks!
18:44:05 jangutter jaypipes: amazingly, moving those regex comment lines up didn't break anything else. I regard regexes as "write-only-code", so I tend to leave my future self notes as to what they should do.
18:44:15 sean-k-mooney mriedem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485304 should now be up to date
18:45:07 sean-k-mooney jangutter: yes regexes to tend to be like perl, write once debug never
18:49:14 sean-k-mooney moshele seams to be offline and the new melonox ci dose not seam to be commenting back on this patchset.
18:50:08 sean-k-mooney do we want to leave moshele have the final approval/wait for the ci to comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485125
18:50:50 mriedem melwitt: some nits in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446243/
18:51:26 melwitt mriedem: cool, thanks
18:52:41 jaypipes sean-k-mooney: approved it. not a high risk thing.
18:53:24 jangutter sean-k-mooney: if it fails on the Mellanox CI, then there's a missing test case...
18:55:04 sean-k-mooney jaypipes: cool well hopefully we can do the release and bump the upper constriants and global requirement tomorrow once https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485304 is merged.
18:55:51 sean-k-mooney im going to log off for the night so ill chat to ye tomorrow
18:58:58 jangutter ditto, thanks very much!
18:59:11 mriedem i'll take care of that today
18:59:59 sean-k-mooney mriedem: the requirement or was that in responce to something else
19:01:14 mriedem to your stuff
19:01:21 mriedem i will make all your dreams come true
19:01:50 mriedem https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps7tVvQHLyo
19:03:20 mriedem TheJulia: so for the bfv change, is there a passing ci for it in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472740/ ?
19:03:51 mriedem oh i see,
19:04:03 mriedem answer is 'no' because the project-config changes for the experimental queue job aren't landed
19:04:18 jaypipes cfriesen: yet another reason the resize workflow (and its manual confirm/revert step) is antithetical to cloudy automation :(
19:05:17 mriedem cfriesen: you guys have some people doing perf testing against master?
19:05:27 mriedem like at least rally testing?
19:06:58 mriedem jlvillal: left a suggestion in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470307/
19:07:10 mriedem jlvillal: there are ways to test things using devstack-gate before they land as a job in project-config
19:07:57 jlvillal mriedem, Thanks. Yeah I know about the hack devstack-gate thing :)
19:08:21 jlvillal mriedem, We actually have a different patch which I think is ready to merge
19:08:25 TheJulia mriedem: your own investigation beat me to answering
19:08:27 mriedem btw, what's the difference between https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480332/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470307/ ?
19:08:37 mriedem jlvillal: that's what i was wondering
19:08:42 jlvillal mriedem, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480332/
19:08:42 mriedem can the merge conflict one be dropped
19:08:55 jlvillal mriedem, I think so. I'll leave a comment
19:09:14 mriedem cool, because i'd like to see this series actually pass ci somewhere before we approve it in nova
19:09:50 TheJulia mriedem: derekh was working on it and then had to disappear for a week or two so hshiina picked it up and made a new patch
19:09:59 mriedem ok
19:10:11 TheJulia 470307 likely just needs to be abandoned at this point

Earlier   Later