Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-07-19
16:28:24 sean-k-mooney mriedem: you can migrate between cells? i taught you were normally limited to mightions within the same availablity zone. can you disable that check with a force flage?
16:28:25 bauzas mriedem: most of the spec is describing not some implementation proposal, just the workflow how it should work
16:29:01 bauzas mriedem: jaypipes: the only bits requiring implementation is internal to the drivers, right?
16:29:27 bauzas given we already have the virt driver interface for all of that
16:29:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: api-ref: Verify parameters in os-migrations.inc https://review.openstack.org/474879
16:30:29 jaypipes bauzas: sorry, reading back, was on a call
16:30:38 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Stop using mox stubs in test_remote_consoles.py https://review.openstack.org/478423
16:30:39 mriedem sean-k-mooney: you can't migrate between cells
16:32:03 sean-k-mooney mriedem: oh sorry missread your comment. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408955 currently allows it when it should not
16:33:17 jaypipes bauzas: so, the vgpu spec indeed mentions traits in extra specs, but it doesn't mention *custom* traits or *custom* resource classes :) jianghuaw has been good about pushing for standardized resource classes and traits.
16:34:23 mriedem sean-k-mooney: correct
16:36:20 mriedem jaypipes: bauzas: let's leave the vgpus stuff for after FF please
16:36:22 mriedem ffs
16:36:56 bauzas mriedem: jaypipes: sure didn't really wanted to make it clearly for now
16:37:03 bauzas just sharing thoughts
16:38:49 cdent mriedem: I think I fixed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485263/
16:39:16 sean-k-mooney jangutter: can you click the rebase button on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485125 so that the commit id wont change when it merges
16:40:07 openstackgerrit Jan Gutter proposed openstack/os-vif master: Improve OVS Representor VF Lookup https://review.openstack.org/485125
16:40:19 sean-k-mooney jangutter: im going to create a patch to the release repo to tag that commit for the 1.6.1 release of os-vif
16:40:31 jangutter sean-k-mooney: done
16:41:10 sean-k-mooney jangutter: cool ill just check locally but now it should be able to merge without a merge commit being created
16:44:15 openstackgerrit John Haan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support volume_type with BDM paramter https://review.openstack.org/466595
16:47:04 ralonsoh cdent, edleafe: thanks for your reviews in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483451/. I posted my reply
16:48:27 melwitt counting instances is in the gate \o/ \o/ \o/
16:49:24 mriedem f yeah
16:49:36 mriedem melwitt: are you going to cleanup the 'remove refresh-quotas cli' change todya?
16:49:43 mriedem if not, i can whack at that
16:50:17 melwitt mriedem: yes, gonna hit that next
16:50:29 mriedem awesome
16:51:55 mriedem sheet, cellsv2 meeting in 9 minutes
16:51:58 mriedem dansmith: you want me to run it?
16:52:35 dansmith ugh
16:52:36 dansmith mriedem: melwitt do we have things to talk about other than the obvious/
16:52:55 dansmith obvious being "get the quotas shit merged"
16:52:59 mriedem i don't have anythign that's not in the etherpad
16:53:14 mriedem https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-pike-cells-v2-todos
16:53:30 melwitt heh, yeah. I don't have anything else at the moment
16:53:34 mriedem the uuids apis are +W now too
16:54:04 melwitt today is the best day
16:55:17 dansmith let's just punt then because I'm covered up in other stuff
16:55:31 dansmith except not so much
16:56:33 melwitt sounds cool
16:57:46 dansmith it's so not
16:58:08 melwitt I mean punting sounds cool
16:58:13 melwitt :)
16:58:20 mriedem packstack on mitaka sounds f'ing awesome
16:58:27 mriedem like crowbar on folsom
16:58:31 melwitt I ran packstack for kilo a few days ago and ... it worked
17:06:05 openstackgerrit John Haan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support volume_type with BDM paramter https://review.openstack.org/466595
17:08:20 mriedem sdague: bauzas: jaypipes: easy one to keep quotas series going https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446242/
17:08:43 bauzas I saw the big quotas patch in the gate
17:08:49 bauzas cool
17:10:21 melwitt yaaay
17:13:30 openstackgerrit John Haan proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support volume_type with BDM paramter https://review.openstack.org/466595
17:14:08 bauzas mriedem: since we didn't added a relnote for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416521/63 do you think we should at least add a note saying that the 'reserved' QS is no longer accepted in Pike as per https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446242/41 ?
17:14:16 bauzas dansmith: melwitt: ^
17:14:37 mriedem bauzas: it is accepted
17:14:39 mriedem it's just ignored
17:15:00 mriedem the end cloud user isn't going to read the release notes, they are going to read the api reference
17:15:06 mriedem and the api doesn't change
17:15:12 bauzas mriedem: sure, I meant telling people that if they use it, it won't no longer be something we check
17:15:22 bauzas meh, good point
17:15:23 mriedem no, that's just noise imo
17:15:31 bauzas it's more an API doc
17:15:32 dansmith and we're not reserving so ignoring it is reasonable right?
17:15:45 mriedem yeah this is all internal tomfoolery
17:16:02 mriedem as i noted in there, i'll propose removing that query parameter with a microversion in queens
17:16:03 dansmith it's noise, IMHO
17:16:03 dansmith reserved amounts are transient
17:16:03 dansmith if we improved boot performance, you'd see the same behavior
17:19:33 bauzas mriedem: dansmith: can't find the API reference for that API endpoint FWIW
17:19:39 bauzas am I blind ?
17:19:48 mriedem limits
17:19:56 mriedem another way to think of that is if the cloud used the noop quota driver,
17:19:57 melwitt the used limits API is read only, it's just showing "reserved" usage
17:20:02 mriedem there wouldn't be reservations
17:20:17 mriedem https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/?expanded=show-rate-and-absolute-limits-detail
17:20:33 bauzas https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/#show-rate-and-absolute-limits
17:20:34 mriedem https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/?expanded=show-rate-and-absolute-limits-detail#limits-limits
17:20:37 bauzas yeah
17:20:57 bauzas so my question is, should we take the opportunity to remove 'reserved' from the API doc $
17:20:59 bauzas ^
17:21:19 mriedem no
17:21:30 mriedem because the api doc is true for liberty deployments
17:21:37 mriedem which aren't using counting quotas
17:21:41 melwitt yeah, like I thought that would require a microversion to just remove it from the API
17:21:46 bauzas oh right
17:21:52 bauzas we would need to microversion
17:21:59 melwitt since we're not reserving, "reserved" is 0 technically
17:22:01 mriedem jesus yes that's what i said in the patch itself
17:22:05 melwitt lol
17:22:29 jaypipes mriedem: done.
17:22:40 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446242/41/nova/api/openstack/compute/used_limits.py@a65
17:23:07 bauzas argh, jaypipes beated me up
17:23:40 bauzas mriedem: melwitt: for my knowledge, when did we stopped using that flag?
17:23:49 openstackgerrit Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/nova master: Read Neutron port 'binding_profile' during boot https://review.openstack.org/449257
17:23:50 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416521/
17:23:53 mriedem in there ^
17:24:02 mriedem the last reservable resource was instances,
17:24:13 mriedem and that change changes instnaces from a reservable resource to a countable resource

Earlier   Later