| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-04-17 | |||
| 16:33:39 | edleafe | to someone on my team running the ironic 3rd party CI: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115487.html | |
| 16:34:37 | mriedem | yeah looks like the same problem | |
| 16:47:14 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Register osapi_compute when nova-api is wsgi https://review.openstack.org/457283 | |
| 16:47:28 | cdent | sdague (and others): ^ | |
| 16:47:41 | cdent | has an important flaw (noted in the commit message) | |
| 16:54:38 | sdague | cdent: so, besides test fixups, what are your concerns there? | |
| 16:56:21 | sdague | because that seems logical enough to me, and all the places where we seem to use this really can't be hit if we didn't ever start an api service | |
| 17:42:50 | melwitt | jaypipes: do we know whenabouts placement stuff will be handling BFV instances properly i.e. not counting them against compute node available disk? | |
| 17:43:10 | jaypipes | melwitt: ? it already should... | |
| 17:44:31 | melwitt | jaypipes: hm, okay. sorry I'm not in the know. I had proposed this in Feb to account for it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428505/ but let me see if I can figure out if/how it's working now | |
| 17:45:35 | melwitt | that was for claims and reporting. and dansmith had put this one up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/428481 | |
| 17:46:13 | melwitt | for requesting zero root disk | |
| 17:46:21 | jaypipes | melwitt: I was thinking of this: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/scheduler/client/report.py#L147-L154 | |
| 17:46:52 | dansmith | claims in the scheduler gets us where we want to be I think | |
| 17:47:11 | dansmith | the hangup with what we have now is the old rt claims for bfv things | |
| 17:49:33 | melwitt | okay. there's old RT reporting for instance usage too but maybe the scheduler is no longer looking at that? | |
| 17:49:57 | melwitt | and then the last piece is whether we request zero root disk for BFV instances | |
| 17:49:58 | dansmith | as of fully-upgraded ocata yeah | |
| 17:50:13 | dansmith | we do request zero for bfv | |
| 17:50:16 | dansmith | already | |
| 17:50:38 | melwitt | okay, nice. so both of those got handled in ocata | |
| 17:53:43 | melwitt | thanks. I'm composing a comment for a BZ about this and wanted to get a ballpark of when things with BFV might be all good | |
| 17:58:15 | jaypipes | melwitt: BZ? | |
| 17:58:31 | melwitt | bugzilla, red hat | |
| 17:58:47 | jaypipes | ah | |
| 17:59:42 | melwitt | there are many customers very interested in this :) | |
| 18:00:38 | openstackgerrit | Nikita Gerasimov proposed openstack/nova master: Set default disk bus for libvirt+Xen HVM to "xen" https://review.openstack.org/457320 | |
| 18:08:35 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Register osapi_compute when nova-api is wsgi https://review.openstack.org/457283 | |
| 18:21:58 | mriedem | i shiny new donkey to whoever can fix "DeprecationWarning: Policy enforcement is depending on the value of is_admin. This key is deprecated. Please update your policy file to use the standard policy values.'" | |
| 18:40:38 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Use deepcopy when process filters in db api https://review.openstack.org/456872 | |
| 18:40:42 | mriedem | jaypipes: i rebased Kevin_Zheng's patch on top of my regression test for the same bug, and fixed something in his patch | |
| 18:40:44 | mriedem | ^ | |
| 18:42:11 | jaypipes | mriedem: done | |
| 18:42:17 | mriedem | high 5 | |
| 18:52:14 | jaypipes | dansmith: hey, is your cells talk before my talks on resource providers? /me considering adding a "hey, you learned in superdan's talk that X, Y, and Z..." to mine. :) | |
| 18:52:36 | dansmith | jaypipes: heh, I dunnoski | |
| 18:53:35 | jaypipes | dansmith: it is indeed :) | |
| 18:54:09 | jaypipes | dansmith: yours is Wednesday evening from 5:20pm - 6pm, right when everyone's nice and perky. ;) | |
| 18:54:37 | dansmith | jaypipes: yeah, I will be in a super good mood | |
| 18:54:39 | jaypipes | dansmith: mine's the next day around that time when everyone has already left the summit. | |
| 18:54:48 | dansmith | hah | |
| 18:57:05 | jaypipes | dansmith, mriedem: mordred definitely has the best talk abstract of all of us: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18678/multi-cloud-demo-w-monty-taylor | |
| 19:05:13 | dansmith | heh | |
| 19:06:01 | mriedem | ha | |
| 19:06:13 | mriedem | "something something shade" | |
| 19:06:19 | mriedem | that should be the abstract | |
| 19:14:15 | mriedem | dansmith: jaypipes: don't forget the project update, of which i've already forgotten what happened in ocata | |
| 19:14:24 | mriedem | wed at 11am | |
| 19:14:44 | jaypipes | mriedem: I'll be wearing my brown pants. | |
| 19:14:59 | mriedem | i don't know what that means | |
| 19:15:08 | mriedem | just wrapping up your UPS deliveries? | |
| 19:15:30 | dansmith | mriedem: yeah I remember.. hoping you're going to tell me what to say more than a few hours before it starts | |
| 19:15:44 | edleafe | mriedem: http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/95q2/pants.html | |
| 19:15:49 | mriedem | dansmith: haven't gotten the template yet | |
| 19:16:52 | mriedem | edleafe: ok i figured poo was involved | |
| 19:18:24 | mriedem | dansmith: jaypipes: for the project update, when it gets to the part about the R release content, that's when i hand over the mic | |
| 19:18:45 | dansmith | mriedem: and that's when the pants really help | |
| 19:19:15 | mriedem | no it's simple | |
| 19:19:20 | mriedem | "nested resource providers by R" | |
| 19:19:24 | mriedem | "maybe" | |
| 19:19:40 | dansmith | heh | |
| 19:19:43 | mriedem | "hierarchical quotas?" | |
| 19:20:37 | mriedem | jaypipes: you want me to take my turn at updating this spec? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454983/ | |
| 19:20:51 | mriedem | i want to just say we're going to deprecate the old cinder/glance/neutron endpoint options once we are using ksa | |
| 19:21:04 | mriedem | and drop those in the next release | |
| 19:21:17 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Sort CellMappingList.get_all() for safety https://review.openstack.org/443174 | |
| 19:21:17 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Clean up ClientRouter debt https://review.openstack.org/444487 | |
| 19:21:19 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add workaround to disable group policy check upcall https://review.openstack.org/442736 | |
| 19:21:20 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make server groups api aware of multiple cells for membership https://review.openstack.org/457338 | |
| 19:21:21 | mriedem | jaypipes: plus probably change assignee to TBD | |
| 19:21:49 | mriedem | will need to sync up with john this week about what osic owned that now needs a new owner | |
| 19:27:18 | lifeless | efried: bugs.python.org still | |
| 19:28:21 | efried | lifeless Someone tagged an existing bug that looked likely. I've got no experience looking at these things, but it doesn't look like it's in a release yet. | |
| 19:29:09 | efried | And likelihood of backport to 2.7 seems low, so I'm not sure it's going to be much use to me in the near future. | |
| 19:31:18 | mriedem | ooo nice http://docs-draft.openstack.org/98/456198/1/check/gate-placement-api-ref-nv/deee665//placement-api-ref/build/html/ | |
| 19:32:14 | jaypipes | mriedem: yes, please go ahead on that service catalog spec. | |
| 19:37:31 | lifeless | efried: so 'mock' is the backport mechanism, if there is a fix in git, we'll pick it up and make it available | |
| 19:38:02 | efried | lifeless Okay, cool. I'll keep an eye on those two bug reports. | |
| 19:38:04 | efried | Thanks | |
| 19:39:43 | mordred | jaypipes: it's not as good as my summit talk that didn't get accepted | |
| 19:40:11 | jaypipes | lol | |
| 19:51:09 | mriedem | alex_xu: this must be yingxin's perf benchmark tool for the nova scheduler https://github.com/cyx1231st/nova-scheduler-bench | |
| 19:53:57 | mriedem | nice, readme says you can use devstack single node | |
| 20:00:58 | comstud | mriedem: quotas are not my fault. | |
| 20:01:10 | comstud | :) | |
| 20:01:16 | mriedem | comstud: is that something i said 3 weeks ago? | |
| 20:01:24 | comstud | at least | |
| 20:01:27 | mriedem | ha | |
| 20:01:38 | mriedem | comstud: but your name is all over the TODOs :) | |
| 20:01:53 | comstud | My name was over a race condition TODO re: instance delete | |
| 20:02:04 | mriedem | guilt by association | |
| 20:02:08 | comstud | but that TODO existed prior to quotas | |
| 20:02:12 | comstud | :) | |
| 20:02:24 | mriedem | comstud: riddle me this: who do i blame for instance delete? | |
| 20:02:38 | comstud | well | |
| 20:02:41 | comstud | a lot of people | |
| 20:02:49 | comstud | I did put effort into trying to resolve races | |
| 20:03:13 | jroll | whoa, comstud is here | |
| 20:03:15 | comstud | that particular TODO you were asking about... was definitely to cover the case of 2 concurrent API requests for deleting the same instance | |
| 20:03:20 | comstud | jroll: :) | |