| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-04-17 | |||
| 10:40:11 | cdent | bhagyashris: what's the other scenario? | |
| 10:40:15 | bhagyashris | cdent: ok. | |
| 10:42:23 | bhagyashris | cdent: scenario 2: I have created 64 instances parallely using (nova boot --flavor <id> --image <id> --max-count 64 test) then I have tried to create one more instance then in that case the instance goes into the error state by giving the Novalid host found at n-cond side and RetryFilter is returning the zero host at n-sch | |
| 10:45:01 | cdent | bhagyashris: what's your inventory for that compute-node? | |
| 10:47:06 | bhagyashris | cdent: the inventories are available. I mean the request resource are available on my compute-node | |
| 10:47:08 | cdent | my guess is that you're running out of inventory in both cases, but in the first scenario the availalbe inventory and the allocations are racing, allowing more nodes to be placed than ought to be possible. however I'm not sure how/why the compute-node would allow that | |
| 10:48:32 | cdent | bhagyashris: I think we're going to need to gather a lot more info to diagnose this so I think the right thing to do would be for you to create a bug report and include or attach: are you master or ocata? the inventory of the compute node. the logs for nova-compute and placement-api. | |
| 10:48:46 | cdent | because without more data I can't do anything more than guess | |
| 10:49:34 | bhagyashris | cdent: ok I will share all the info by reporting the bug. | |
| 10:49:47 | cdent | and at the moment I need to go to an appt, but am very curious about this so being able to track the bug would be great | |
| 10:49:54 | cdent | thanks | |
| 10:50:23 | bhagyashris | cdent: Thank you, for you time and info | |
| 10:50:42 | cdent | thank you for trying things out. we haven't had enough of that, so you doing so is great. | |
| 10:50:42 | bhagyashris | cdent: Yeah sure I will share bug id too | |
| 10:51:02 | bhagyashris | cdent: :) | |
| 11:02:37 | openstackgerrit | ChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed openstack/nova master: Remove usage of parameter enforce_type https://review.openstack.org/457188 | |
| 11:02:37 | openstackgerrit | ChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed openstack/nova master: Remove test_init_nonexist_schedulerdriver https://review.openstack.org/457210 | |
| 11:31:33 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/nova master: Add Neutron port capabilities to devspec in request https://review.openstack.org/451777 | |
| 11:52:09 | pradiprwt | hi Everyone, I am facing some issue with placement api in nova while installation og ocata version | |
| 11:52:31 | pradiprwt | Failed to retrieve filtered list of resource providers from placement API for filters {'resources': 'DISK_GB:1,MEMORY_MB:64,VCPU:1'}. Got 404: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"> | |
| 11:52:41 | pradiprwt | The requested URL /placement/resource_providers was not found on this server | |
| 12:01:58 | cdent | pradiprwt: how did you do your install? there are three mostly likley problems: one is that placement hasn't been registered in the service catalog, another is that the apache configuration is wrong in two different ways: a missing |
|
| 12:02:38 | pradiprwt | cdent : sure | |
| 12:04:56 | pradiprwt | cdent : which apache configuration file I should send, is that /etc/apache2/apache2.conf ..? | |
| 12:05:50 | cdent | pradiprwt: do you have an /etc/apache2/site-enabled/placement.conf or something similar to that? | |
| 12:07:51 | pradiprwt | cdent : /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/nova-placement-api.conf ::: http://paste.openstack.org/show/606890/ | |
| 12:08:04 | cdent | thank pradiprwt | |
| 12:08:16 | cdent | let me see if i can relocate a recent bug that is related to this | |
| 12:09:56 | cdent | pradiprwt: see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441208 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441200 | |
| 12:09:56 | openstack | bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1441208 in openstack-nova "placement api apache configuration does not align with documentation, ensure system does not work" [High,Closed: duplicate] - Assigned to nlevinki | |
| 12:09:57 | openstack | bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1441200 in openstack-nova "openstack-placement-api.conf not configured properly by the openstack-nova-placement-api rpm" [Unspecified,Post] - Assigned to nlevinki | |
| 12:10:24 | cdent | pradiprwt: there's a section missing | |
| 12:12:35 | pradiprwt | cdent : which section is missing ? | |
| 12:12:39 | cdent | pradiprwt: see what I've added at the end here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/606892/ | |
| 12:12:53 | cdent | that may or may not be needed, depending on what's in your service catalog for placement | |
| 12:13:44 | pradiprwt | cdent : let me try this | |
| 12:20:29 | pradiprwt | cdent : same error I am getting after adding the section in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/nova-placement-api.conf | |
| 12:20:56 | cdent | pradiprwt: what's in your service catalog as the endpoint for placement? | |
| 12:22:07 | cdent | pradiprwt: what document did you use to set things up? are you installing from packages or some other method? | |
| 12:23:18 | pradiprwt | cdent : I have used ocata official documentation using ubuntu 16.04 | |
| 12:24:24 | pradiprwt | https://docs.openstack.org/ocata/install-guide-ubuntu/ | |
| 12:25:19 | cdent | pradiprwt: okay, I think it's still the case that either your apache configuration is not complete, or your service catalog has the wrong information in it. so you could share your service catalog endpoint for placement, that would be useful | |
| 12:26:48 | pradiprwt | cdent : endpoint list cdent | |
| 12:27:12 | pradiprwt | http://paste.openstack.org/show/606894/ | |
| 12:30:57 | cdent | pradiprwt: there's a few different issues on the changes I provided in the paste i gave you, here' s a different version: http://paste.openstack.org/show/606895/ | |
| 12:41:33 | pradiprwt | cdent: thank, now it's working | |
| 12:41:43 | pradiprwt | I am able to create instance | |
| 12:41:43 | cdent | yay! | |
| 12:41:49 | pradiprwt | :) | |
| 12:42:23 | pradiprwt | cdent: Is there any problem with documentation ? | |
| 12:42:32 | cdent | pradiprwt: you may want to report a bug with ubuntu, because that configuration that's in their packages is not right | |
| 12:42:45 | cdent | no the docs are okay, I think, it seems the package is wrong | |
| 12:42:50 | pradiprwt | cdent : ok | |
| 12:43:37 | cdent | jamespage: are you aware of the above stuff with packaging of placement? | |
| 12:54:53 | openstackgerrit | ChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed openstack/nova master: Remove usage of parameter enforce_type https://review.openstack.org/457188 | |
| 12:54:53 | openstackgerrit | ChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed openstack/nova master: Remove test_init_nonexist_schedulerdriver https://review.openstack.org/457210 | |
| 13:07:43 | sdague | dansmith / melwitt - when you get up and about - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1672625 | |
| 13:07:43 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1672625 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Instance stuck in schedule state in Ocata release" [Undecided,New] | |
| 13:07:58 | sdague | it looks like something missing on the cells enablement in the docs maybe? | |
| 13:17:05 | dane-fichter | anyone want to review some security code? there's a bug fix for ephemeral storage encryption that hasn't gotten a review in almost a month | |
| 13:17:10 | dane-fichter | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446072/ | |
| 13:17:30 | dane-fichter | ^ ephemeral storage encryption is broken right now, this fixes it | |
| 13:22:43 | efried | edmondsw ^^ ? | |
| 13:24:13 | edmondsw | efried, already has a bunch of +1s... I think they're looking for some +2s | |
| 13:24:37 | efried | edmondsw Yuh, hadn't looked at it yet when I tagged ya. Just saw "security" and... | |
| 13:24:45 | edmondsw | :) | |
| 13:30:25 | ericyoung | if core reviewer wants to look over some code, I could use a second + on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/452538/ | |
| 13:30:40 | dansmith | sdague: nope, i think it's all on that doc, including the step they missed | |
| 13:30:57 | dansmith | sdague: dunno about the ubuntu docs, but the first one linked which we own has got the stuff | |
| 13:33:49 | bhagyashris | johnthetubaguy: Hi, I have addressed the review comment. Could you please take some insight on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409644/? Thank you. | |
| 13:35:34 | sdague | dansmith: ok, you want to close out the issue as invalid? | |
| 13:35:46 | dansmith | yeah I will write something and do that | |
| 14:14:55 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: power_on/off and reboot https://review.openstack.org/427380 | |
| 14:27:49 | openstackgerrit | Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: remove unused parameter in rpc call https://review.openstack.org/447055 | |
| 14:28:11 | cfriesen | ^ that should sort out the unit test change | |
| 14:32:37 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: spawn/destroy #3: TaskFlow https://review.openstack.org/438729 | |
| 14:46:46 | gcb | mriedem, please help review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/457188/ which fixes py35 gate failure when oslo.config 4.0 is released | |
| 15:00:45 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: spawn/destroy #4: full flavor https://review.openstack.org/391288 | |
| 15:01:09 | alex_xu | jaypipes: we still need this spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351063/ for setting a set of required traits and preferred traits in flavor, right? | |
| 15:02:07 | jaypipes | alex_xu: yes | |
| 15:02:16 | alex_xu | jaypipes: ok, got it | |
| 15:02:28 | jaypipes | alex_xu: you want to get that in shape? | |
| 15:03:08 | mriedem | jaypipes: alex_xu: is that for pike though? | |
| 15:03:11 | alex_xu | jaypipes: yes | |
| 15:03:12 | mriedem | required vs preferred? | |
| 15:03:21 | mriedem | i'm pretty sure that's queens at this point | |
| 15:03:28 | alex_xu | i guess no for pike | |
| 15:03:46 | mriedem | we needed traits to mark a compute resource provider, as well, compute - so we could do the shared storage aggregate stuff i thought? | |
| 15:03:58 | jaypipes | mriedem: probably wouldn't hurt to get going on that in Pike. | |
| 15:04:08 | jaypipes | mriedem: but understand it's lower priority. | |
| 15:04:13 | mriedem | jaypipes: it would hurt if it means pushing out 3 other things we already said we'd do | |
| 15:04:20 | jaypipes | ack | |
| 15:04:29 | mriedem | like, doing that means no nested resource providers i'm sure | |
| 15:04:32 | mriedem | etc | |
| 15:04:47 | jaypipes | mriedem: ya. | |
| 15:05:02 | alex_xu | yea, I probably just writing some PoC for that, low priority | |
| 15:05:05 | mriedem | jaypipes: do you know if mirantis still has a perf benchmark lab? | |
| 15:05:11 | mriedem | for dina's team? | |
| 15:06:00 | jaypipes | mriedem: we do. | |
| 15:06:05 | mriedem | going back to the claims in scheduler vs conductor discussion, it's hard to make that decision without some actual data from both scenarios with a large number of computes | |