| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-04-17 | |||
| 12:20:29 | pradiprwt | cdent : same error I am getting after adding the section in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/nova-placement-api.conf | |
| 12:20:56 | cdent | pradiprwt: what's in your service catalog as the endpoint for placement? | |
| 12:22:07 | cdent | pradiprwt: what document did you use to set things up? are you installing from packages or some other method? | |
| 12:23:18 | pradiprwt | cdent : I have used ocata official documentation using ubuntu 16.04 | |
| 12:24:24 | pradiprwt | https://docs.openstack.org/ocata/install-guide-ubuntu/ | |
| 12:25:19 | cdent | pradiprwt: okay, I think it's still the case that either your apache configuration is not complete, or your service catalog has the wrong information in it. so you could share your service catalog endpoint for placement, that would be useful | |
| 12:26:48 | pradiprwt | cdent : endpoint list cdent | |
| 12:27:12 | pradiprwt | http://paste.openstack.org/show/606894/ | |
| 12:30:57 | cdent | pradiprwt: there's a few different issues on the changes I provided in the paste i gave you, here' s a different version: http://paste.openstack.org/show/606895/ | |
| 12:41:33 | pradiprwt | cdent: thank, now it's working | |
| 12:41:43 | pradiprwt | I am able to create instance | |
| 12:41:43 | cdent | yay! | |
| 12:41:49 | pradiprwt | :) | |
| 12:42:23 | pradiprwt | cdent: Is there any problem with documentation ? | |
| 12:42:32 | cdent | pradiprwt: you may want to report a bug with ubuntu, because that configuration that's in their packages is not right | |
| 12:42:45 | cdent | no the docs are okay, I think, it seems the package is wrong | |
| 12:42:50 | pradiprwt | cdent : ok | |
| 12:43:37 | cdent | jamespage: are you aware of the above stuff with packaging of placement? | |
| 12:54:53 | openstackgerrit | ChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed openstack/nova master: Remove usage of parameter enforce_type https://review.openstack.org/457188 | |
| 12:54:53 | openstackgerrit | ChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed openstack/nova master: Remove test_init_nonexist_schedulerdriver https://review.openstack.org/457210 | |
| 13:07:43 | sdague | dansmith / melwitt - when you get up and about - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1672625 | |
| 13:07:43 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1672625 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Instance stuck in schedule state in Ocata release" [Undecided,New] | |
| 13:07:58 | sdague | it looks like something missing on the cells enablement in the docs maybe? | |
| 13:17:05 | dane-fichter | anyone want to review some security code? there's a bug fix for ephemeral storage encryption that hasn't gotten a review in almost a month | |
| 13:17:10 | dane-fichter | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446072/ | |
| 13:17:30 | dane-fichter | ^ ephemeral storage encryption is broken right now, this fixes it | |
| 13:22:43 | efried | edmondsw ^^ ? | |
| 13:24:13 | edmondsw | efried, already has a bunch of +1s... I think they're looking for some +2s | |
| 13:24:37 | efried | edmondsw Yuh, hadn't looked at it yet when I tagged ya. Just saw "security" and... | |
| 13:24:45 | edmondsw | :) | |
| 13:30:25 | ericyoung | if core reviewer wants to look over some code, I could use a second + on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/452538/ | |
| 13:30:40 | dansmith | sdague: nope, i think it's all on that doc, including the step they missed | |
| 13:30:57 | dansmith | sdague: dunno about the ubuntu docs, but the first one linked which we own has got the stuff | |
| 13:33:49 | bhagyashris | johnthetubaguy: Hi, I have addressed the review comment. Could you please take some insight on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409644/? Thank you. | |
| 13:35:34 | sdague | dansmith: ok, you want to close out the issue as invalid? | |
| 13:35:46 | dansmith | yeah I will write something and do that | |
| 14:14:55 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: power_on/off and reboot https://review.openstack.org/427380 | |
| 14:27:49 | openstackgerrit | Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: remove unused parameter in rpc call https://review.openstack.org/447055 | |
| 14:28:11 | cfriesen | ^ that should sort out the unit test change | |
| 14:32:37 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: spawn/destroy #3: TaskFlow https://review.openstack.org/438729 | |
| 14:46:46 | gcb | mriedem, please help review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/457188/ which fixes py35 gate failure when oslo.config 4.0 is released | |
| 15:00:45 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: spawn/destroy #4: full flavor https://review.openstack.org/391288 | |
| 15:01:09 | alex_xu | jaypipes: we still need this spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351063/ for setting a set of required traits and preferred traits in flavor, right? | |
| 15:02:07 | jaypipes | alex_xu: yes | |
| 15:02:16 | alex_xu | jaypipes: ok, got it | |
| 15:02:28 | jaypipes | alex_xu: you want to get that in shape? | |
| 15:03:08 | mriedem | jaypipes: alex_xu: is that for pike though? | |
| 15:03:11 | alex_xu | jaypipes: yes | |
| 15:03:12 | mriedem | required vs preferred? | |
| 15:03:21 | mriedem | i'm pretty sure that's queens at this point | |
| 15:03:28 | alex_xu | i guess no for pike | |
| 15:03:46 | mriedem | we needed traits to mark a compute resource provider, as well, compute - so we could do the shared storage aggregate stuff i thought? | |
| 15:03:58 | jaypipes | mriedem: probably wouldn't hurt to get going on that in Pike. | |
| 15:04:08 | jaypipes | mriedem: but understand it's lower priority. | |
| 15:04:13 | mriedem | jaypipes: it would hurt if it means pushing out 3 other things we already said we'd do | |
| 15:04:20 | jaypipes | ack | |
| 15:04:29 | mriedem | like, doing that means no nested resource providers i'm sure | |
| 15:04:32 | mriedem | etc | |
| 15:04:47 | jaypipes | mriedem: ya. | |
| 15:05:02 | alex_xu | yea, I probably just writing some PoC for that, low priority | |
| 15:05:05 | mriedem | jaypipes: do you know if mirantis still has a perf benchmark lab? | |
| 15:05:11 | mriedem | for dina's team? | |
| 15:06:00 | jaypipes | mriedem: we do. | |
| 15:06:05 | mriedem | going back to the claims in scheduler vs conductor discussion, it's hard to make that decision without some actual data from both scenarios with a large number of computes | |
| 15:06:18 | jaypipes | mriedem: though it's much much smaller than it used to be... | |
| 15:06:44 | mriedem | i wonder if we could fake things out with a functional test that mocks out 300 computes or something | |
| 15:07:05 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: console https://review.openstack.org/409402 | |
| 15:07:20 | mriedem | and then run both options against that - you'd have to do something to introduce random collisions though to force the retry | |
| 15:07:39 | mriedem | didn't yingxin from intel mock something up like that | |
| 15:08:17 | jaypipes | mriedem: kinda I think? | |
| 15:11:24 | mriedem | jaypipes: was thinking of this https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1UG1HkEWyxPVMXseLwJ44ZDm-ek_MPc4M65H8EiwZnWs/edit?ts=571fcdd5#slide=id.g12d2cf15cd_2_90 | |
| 15:11:27 | mriedem | from the austin summit | |
| 15:11:48 | mriedem | alex_xu: is yingxin still on your team? | |
| 15:12:24 | alex_xu | mriedem: yingxin is in the team based on shanghai, he is moving to ceph stuff | |
| 15:12:51 | alex_xu | mriedem: but I remember yingxin put his tool in the github | |
| 15:14:31 | mriedem | https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1UG1HkEWyxPVMXseLwJ44ZDm-ek_MPc4M65H8EiwZnWs/edit?ts=571fcdd5#slide=id.g12d2cf15cd_2_143 | |
| 15:14:36 | mriedem | 1.079 query/secondIn 1000 node simulation | |
| 15:14:52 | mriedem | 99% of the time spent in the scheduler was get_all_host_state | |
| 15:15:19 | mriedem | so we should have dropped that with using placement now for the simple filters | |
| 15:15:38 | mriedem | but it would be interesting to know how much, i.e. 75% now? 50%? | |
| 15:16:26 | edleafe | mriedem: really hard to extrapolate. It would be so nice to have a large test bed to get real numbers from | |
| 15:16:42 | mriedem | edleafe: yeah, if only there was some kind of openstack innovation center... | |
| 15:16:54 | edleafe | R.I.P. | |
| 15:16:58 | mriedem | :( | |
| 15:22:08 | dansmith | mriedem: fwiw, I have a replacement ready for that revert, but will wait until it clears the gate so I don't rebase and kick it out | |
| 15:22:43 | mriedem | ok | |
| 15:22:53 | mriedem | i'm working on a functional test for a regression with filtering servers by tags | |
| 15:23:04 | mriedem | works fine on py27 but fails on py35 of course | |
| 15:34:31 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test for server filtering by tags bug 1682693 https://review.openstack.org/457103 | |
| 15:34:31 | mriedem | dansmith: this ^ | |
| 15:34:35 | openstack | bug 1682693 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "tags and not-tags cannot work properly" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1682693 - Assigned to Zhenyu Zheng (zhengzhenyu) | |
| 15:35:11 | dansmith | ack | |
| 16:00:14 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: SSP emphemeral disk support https://review.openstack.org/443189 | |
| 16:05:02 | clarkb | mriedem: edleafe can you not mock it up with a bunch of computes that are just pretending to be scheduled to? I think nova even includes a fake virt driver for this :) | |
| 16:05:15 | mriedem | clarkb: yes | |
| 16:05:32 | edleafe | clarkb: yes, that's what it looks like we will have to do | |
| 16:05:34 | mriedem | clarkb: that was my original idea, do it as a nova-functional test or something | |
| 16:06:05 | edleafe | the main chunk will be the db query and return of matching hosts | |
| 16:07:00 | edleafe | so setting up a reasonable scenario with 1000 hosts and various inventory/allocations should be close enough | |
| 16:25:49 | mriedem | does someone want to put the +W on this novaclient 2.42 change? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/429512/ that's blocking some other pike microversions from getting into novaclient - artom, you might want to review that one too | |